ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01257737

To Evaluate the Safety of Long-term Use of HPN-100 in the Management of Urea Cycle Disorders (UCDs)

NCT01257737, Phase 4, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2018-05-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. To Evaluate the Safety of Long-term Use of HPN-100 in the Management of Urea Cycle Disorders (UCDs). Trials, record NCT01257737. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01257737

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
To Evaluate the Safety of Long-term Use of HPN-100 in the Management of Urea Cycle Disorders (UCDs)
NCT number
NCT01257737
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
88 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Urea Cycle Disorders
Interventions
HPN-100
First posted
2010-12-10
Last updated
2024-08-22
Results first posted
2018-05-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventFrom the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months
Safety was assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs). An AE/adverse experience was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. For additional information regarding adverse events, please see the safety section of the record.
SecondaryMean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsFrom baseline through the end of the study, up to 66 months
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of plasma ammonia concentrations at baseline, at least every 6 months, at all unscheduled visits, and at the end of study participation. Ammonia level data were obtained from different local laboratories and each laboratory may have used a slightly different normal reference range. Therefore, the ammonia level data were normalized to a standard laboratory reference range before performing any analysis of ammonia data.
SecondaryNumber of Hyperammonemic CrisesFrom the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 monthsAn hyperammonemic crisis (HAC) was defined as clinical symptoms associated with a venous ammonia concentration of ≥100 μmol/L.
SecondaryCauses of Hyperammonemic CrisesFrom the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 months
An hyperammonemic crisis (HAC) was defined as clinical symptoms associated with a venous ammonia concentration of ≥100 μmol/L. Peak observed ammonia concentrations during an HAC, precipitating factors, and symptoms recorded as suggestive to hyperammonemia were documented. There can be multiple contributing factors to an hyperammonemic crisis; in some cases several causes were identified.
SecondaryMean Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) was administered to adults and pediatric participants who were at least 6 years of age. It was used to estimate general intellectual ability (IQ) based on the vocabulary and matrix reasoning subtests. The vocabulary subtest included 4 images and 38 verbal items. In the matrix reasoning subtest, the participant viewed 35 incomplete grid patterns and was asked to complete the pattern using responses from 5 possible choices. The number of correct responses for each of the subtests was converted to a T-score using the WASI assessment manual; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Raw scores for the 2 subtests were summed, and converted to a standard score (mean of 100 with SD of 15) for the general IQ score for adults and to a T-score for children in accordance with the WASI manual. Higher scores indicate a higher level of intelligence.
SecondaryMean Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Problems ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely-used method of identifying problem behavior. Two versions of the CBCL were used in this study; the assessment for children 6-18 years of age was used for participants ≥6 years of age, and the assessment for children 1.5-5 years of age was used for those who were at least 5 years old but \<6 years of age. Parents/caregivers answered questions (120 and 100 questions, respectively, for the older and younger populations) using a 3-point Likert scale (0= not true; 1= somewhat or sometimes true; 2 =very true or often true). Using a computer program, responses to similar questions were grouped together into 20 domains (e.g., activities, social, school, etc.), and domain response scores were converted to T-scores and percentiles. A mean score of 50 is average, with a standard deviation of 10 points. Higher scores indicate greater problems. The total problems score is the sum of all of the problem items.
SecondaryMean Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is designed to assess executive functioning in children and adolescents ages 5 to 18 years of age. Parents/caregivers answered 86 questions on a 3-point scale (never, sometimes, often). Similar questions were grouped together into 8 scales; these scales were summed to produce 2 index measures and a global executive composite score. Raw scores for the indices/scales and composite score were converted to T-scores with corresponding 90% confidence intervals using computer software. Higher T-scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction.
SecondaryMean California Verbal Learning Test Scores: List A Total 1-5 T-ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II) assesses recall and recognition of word lists over several immediate- and delayed-memory trials. In the learning phase, adult participants were presented a list of 16 words (List A; 4 words each in 4 categories \[e.g., fruit, toys, etc.\]) for 5 trials, but words from the same category were never presented consecutively. An interference list (List B) of 16 different words was then presented for 1 trial. Short-and long-delay recalls for List A, yes/no recognition trials of List A, and a forced-choice recognition trial of List A was also administered. The total score for the 5 immediate-recall trials was converted to a T-score. Lower T-scores reflect worse performance.
SecondaryMean California Verbal Learning Test Scores: Short and Long Delay Free Recall, Short and Long Delay Cued Recall, CVLT-II-Learning Slope, and Total Word Recognition DiscriminationBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)
The California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II) assesses recall and recognition of word lists over several immediate- and delayed-memory trials. In the learning phase, adult participants were presented a list of 16 words (List A; 4 words each in 4 categories \[e.g., fruit, toys, etc.\]) for 5 trials, but words from the same category were never presented consecutively. An interference list (List B) of 16 different words was then presented for 1 trial. Short-and long-delay recalls for List A, yes/no recognition trials of List A, and a forced-choice recognition trial of List A was also administered. The scores for the learning slope, the short- and long-delay scores and total word recognition discrimination scores were converted to Z-scores by computer software. The CVLT-II Z-score has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Negative scores indicate below-average performance.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventFrom the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 monthsSafety Population: All participants who received any amount of study medicationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsFrom baseline through the end of the study, up to 66 monthsParticipants with available dataμmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Hyperammonemic CrisesFrom the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 monthsSafety Population: All participants who received any amount of study medicationNumber of crisesNUMBER
SECONDARYCauses of Hyperammonemic CrisesFrom the time of informed consent until 7 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 66 monthsParticipants who experienced hyperammonemic crisesNumber of crisesNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)Participants ≥ 6 years of age with available data; data were not analyzed for the 5 ongoing participants in Canada after the cutoff for the clinical study report (29 Oct 2015).T-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYMean Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Problems ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)Participants 5-18 years of age with available data; data were not analyzed for the 1 ongoing pediatric participant in Canada after the cutoff for the clinical study report (29 Oct 2015).T-ScoreMEAN
SECONDARYMean Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)Participants 5-18 years of age with available data; data were not analyzed for the 1 ongoing pediatric participant in Canada after the cutoff for the clinical study report (29 Oct 2015).T-ScoreMEAN
SECONDARYMean California Verbal Learning Test Scores: List A Total 1-5 T-ScoresBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)Adult participants (age 19-61) with available data; data were not analyzed for the 4 ongoing adult participants in Canada after the cutoff for the clinical study report (29 Oct 2015).T-ScoreMEAN
SECONDARYMean California Verbal Learning Test Scores: Short and Long Delay Free Recall, Short and Long Delay Cued Recall, CVLT-II-Learning Slope, and Total Word Recognition DiscriminationBaseline, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48, and study exit visit (up to 66 months)Adult participants (age 19-61) with available data; data were not analyzed for the 4 ongoing adult participants in Canada after the cutoff for the clinical study report (29 Oct 2015).Z-ScoreMEAN

Results by group171

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventHPN-100- Pediatric34Participants
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventHPN-100 - Adult40Participants
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100- PediatricBaseline19.445Standard Deviation 16.4478μmol/L
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100 - AdultBaseline26.005Standard Deviation 23.4156μmol/L
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100- PediatricMonth 618.437Standard Deviation 14.7127μmol/L
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100 - AdultMonth 624.235Standard Deviation 18.2070μmol/L
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100- PediatricMonth 1218.236Standard Deviation 13.7955μmol/L
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100 - AdultMonth 1227.843Standard Deviation 20.3701μmol/L
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100- PediatricMonth 1825.145Standard Deviation 26.2123μmol/L
Mean Normalized Blood Ammonia LevelsHPN-100 - AdultMonth 1831.378Standard Deviation 26.1624μmol/L

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDHPN-100- Pediatric45
Overall StudySTARTEDHPN-100 - Adult43
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDHPN-100- Pediatric43
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDHPN-100 - Adult39
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDHPN-100- Pediatric2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDHPN-100 - Adult4

Adverse events88

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersHPN-100- Pediatric345
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersHPN-100 - Adult743
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersHPN-100- Pediatric245
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersHPN-100 - Adult443
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersHPN-100- Pediatric645
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersHPN-100 - Adult543
otherPainGeneral disordersHPN-100- Pediatric145
otherPainGeneral disordersHPN-100 - Adult343
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersHPN-100- Pediatric345
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersHPN-100 - Adult243

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityHPN-100- Pediatric045
Total, all-cause mortalityHPN-100 - Adult043
Total, other adverse eventsHPN-100- Pediatric2645
Total, other adverse eventsHPN-100 - Adult2743
Total, serious adverse eventsHPN-100- Pediatric1245
Total, serious adverse eventsHPN-100 - Adult1943

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
HPN-100- Pediatric vs HPN-100 - Adult: Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventTrial comparisons
HPN-100- Pediatric vs HPN-100 - Adult: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
HPN-100- Pediatric vs HPN-100 - Adult: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Matrix ReasoningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal LearningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Vocabulary TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01257737

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01257737/results?page=2