ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01277822

Efficacy of Losartan + Amlodipine Compared to Amlodipine Alone in the Treatment of Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure (MK-0954F-399)

NCT01277822, Phase 4, Completed, Organon and Co; results first posted 2014-04-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Losartan + Amlodipine Compared to Amlodipine Alone in the Treatment of Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure (MK-0954F-399). Trials, record NCT01277822. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01277822

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Losartan + Amlodipine Compared to Amlodipine Alone in the Treatment of Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure (MK-0954F-399)
NCT number
NCT01277822
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
334 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Organon and Co
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
Losartan (+) amlodipine, Placebo to match losartan/amlodipine tablets, Amlodipine camsylate, Placebo to match amlodipine
First posted
2011-01-17
Last updated
2024-06-20
Results first posted
2014-04-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
Diastolic blood pressure was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment with the participant in a seated position using an auto sphygmomanometer. Three measurements were performed at 2-minute intervals and the average of the 3 values of was recorded.
SecondaryChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 4Baseline and Week 4
Diastolic blood pressure was assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment with the participant in a seated position using an auto sphygmomanometer. Three measurements were performed at 2-minute intervals and the average of the 3 values of was recorded.
SecondaryChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
Systolic blood pressure was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment with the participant in a seated position using an auto sphygmomanometer. Three measurements were performed at 2-minute intervals and the average of the 3 values of was recorded.
SecondaryChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 4Baseline and Week 4
Systolic blood pressure was assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment with the participant in a seated position using an auto sphygmomanometer. Three measurements were performed at 2-minute intervals and the average of the 3 values of was recorded.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieve Target Blood Pressure at Week 8Week 8
Participants were evaluated at Week 8 to ascertain if target blood pressure had been obtained. Criteria for meeting target BP were: sitting diastolic BP (sitDBP) \<90mmHg or sitting systolic BP (sitSBP) \<140mmHg) or sitDBP change more than 10mmHg from baseline or sitSBP change more than 20mmHg from baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieve Target Blood Pressure at Week 4Week 4
Participants were evaluated at Week 4 to ascertain if target blood pressure had been obtained. Criteria for meeting target BP were: sitting diastolic BP (sitDBP) \<90mmHg or sitting systolic BP (sitSBP) \<140mmHg) or sitDBP change more than 10mmHg from baseline or sitSBP change more than 20mmHg from baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Had Peripheral Edema During the Studyup to 8 weeks
A pitting assessment of edema on both legs was performed at baseline and throughout the study. Participants were assessed in a seated position with both feet extended and the right ankle in a neutral dorsiflexion position. The index finger was pressed firmly over the bony prominence approximately 3cm proximal to the midpoint of the medial malleolus of the right ankle and will be held for three seconds. Presence of a residual indentation in the area after releasing pressure on the index finger was considered positive for pitting edema.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Ankle Circumference at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
Each ankle was marked with a semi-permanent marker at approximately 3 cm proximal to the midpoint of the medial malleolus to aid consistency in the performance of the measurements. Ankle circumference was measured in both ankles at baseline and Week 8 using a tension controlled tape to minimize error.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had blood pressure measurements at baseline and at least 1 post-randomization blood pressure measurement.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 4Baseline and Week 4
Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had blood pressure measurements at baseline and at least 1 post-randomization blood pressure measurement.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had blood pressure measurements at baseline and at least 1 post-randomization blood pressure measurement.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 4Baseline and Week 4
Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had blood pressure measurements at baseline and at least 1 post-randomization blood pressure measurement.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieve Target Blood Pressure at Week 8Week 8
Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had blood pressure measurements at baseline and at least 1 post-randomization blood pressure measurement.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieve Target Blood Pressure at Week 4Week 4
Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who were randomized, took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had blood pressure measurements at baseline and at least 1 post-randomization blood pressure measurement.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Had Peripheral Edema During the Studyup to 8 weeksSafety Set defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Ankle Circumference at Week 8Baseline and Week 8All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data for ankle circumference.mmMEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 8Losartan/Amlodipine-10.1Standard Deviation 7.6mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 8Amlodipine-8.8Standard Deviation 7.8mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 4Losartan/Amlodipine-9.3Standard Deviation 7.8mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) at Week 4Amlodipine-10.0Standard Deviation 7.9mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 8Losartan/Amlodipine-15.0Standard Deviation 12.1mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 8Amlodipine-12.7Standard Deviation 10.7mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 4Losartan/Amlodipine-12.5Standard Deviation 13.2mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) at Week 4Amlodipine-12.3Standard Deviation 10.9mmHg
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Target Blood Pressure at Week 8Losartan/Amlodipine63.0Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Target Blood Pressure at Week 8Amlodipine58.8Percentage of Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLosartan/Amlodipine168
Overall StudySTARTEDAmlodipine166
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLosartan/Amlodipine153
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAmlodipine155
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLosartan/Amlodipine15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAmlodipine11

Adverse events30

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHEADACHENervous system disordersLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg61686
otherHEADACHENervous system disordersAmlodipine 10mg1116611
seriousANGINA UNSTABLECardiac disordersLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg11681
seriousANGINA UNSTABLECardiac disordersAmlodipine 10mg01660
seriousASTHENIAGeneral disordersLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg01680
seriousASTHENIAGeneral disordersAmlodipine 10mg11661
seriousACCIDENTAL OVERDOSEInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg31683
seriousACCIDENTAL OVERDOSEInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsAmlodipine 10mg21662
seriousEXCORIATIONInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg01680
seriousEXCORIATIONInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsAmlodipine 10mg11661

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg
Total, all-cause mortalityAmlodipine 10mg
Total, other adverse eventsLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg6168
Total, other adverse eventsAmlodipine 10mg11166
Total, serious adverse eventsLosartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg6168
Total, serious adverse eventsAmlodipine 10mg5166

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Losartan 100mg/Amlodipine 5mg vs Amlodipine 10mg: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01277822

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01277822/events?page=2