ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01280266

Efficacy Study of PDE-5 Inhibitor and Calcium Channel Inhibitor for the Treatment of Secondary Raynaud Phenomenon

NCT01280266, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Seoul National University Hospital; results first posted 2012-12-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy Study of PDE-5 Inhibitor and Calcium Channel Inhibitor for the Treatment of Secondary Raynaud Phenomenon. Trials, record NCT01280266. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01280266

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy Study of PDE-5 Inhibitor and Calcium Channel Inhibitor for the Treatment of Secondary Raynaud Phenomenon
NCT number
NCT01280266
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
29 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Conditions
Raynaud Phenomenon
Interventions
Udenafil or Amlodipine
First posted
2011-01-20
Last updated
2012-12-11
Results first posted
2012-12-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRP Attacks Per Daybaselin and 4 weeksChange in RP frequency after amlodipine and udenafil number of RP attack per day 0 -- unlimited.
SecondaryChange in Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS)baseline and 4 weeks
change in the RCS. RCS combines daily activty, frequency, duration and severity as well as impact of RP attack (Measuring disease activity and functional status in patients with scleroderma and Raynaud's phenomenon, Merkel et al,Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Sep;46(9):2410-20). Range 0-10 ordinal scale 0..good 10.. bad
SecondaryChange in the RP Durationbaseline and 4 weeksChange in the average RP duration in minutes (min) per attack. 0 -- unlimited
SecondaryChange in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)0 and 4 weeksOrdinal scale 0-10 0 good 10 bad
SecondaryChange in Physician's Global Assessment on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)at 0 (baseline) and 4 weeks (after treatment)
Physician's global assessment (PGA) on VAS assesses the overall condition of the patient. The scale ranges from 0 - 10, with 0 being good and 10 bad. As such, change in the GPA measures the change in the patient's condition from the baseline. negative value (decrease in value) means improvement.
SecondaryChange in Digital Ulcer Numberbaseline and 4 weeks
0 - unlimited. Number of digital ulcers in all fingers are counted by the investigators and recorded at each visit. The number of ulcers in all fingers indirectly reflect the extent of critical ischemia. As such. the decrease in digital ulcer number reflects positive response to treatment (=better blood flow), whereas the increase ulcer numbers indicates worsening finger ischemia from baseline.
SecondaryChange in Peak Systolic Flow (cm/Sec)baseline and 4 weeksChange in digital artery flow velocity in proper palmar digital artery in cm/sec. 0-unlimited
SecondaryTime-averaged Peak Velocity (cm/Sec)baseline and 4 weekschanges in the averaged blood flow (Time-averaged peak velocity) Blood flow in cm/sec 0 - unlimited.
SecondaryDorsal-digital-difference.baseline and 4 weeksThe temperature difference between finger tips and dorsum of same hand. range 0 - unlimited in degree celcius.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRP Attacks Per Daybaselin and 4 weeks14 patients in UA arm + 12 patients in AU armattacks per dayMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS)baseline and 4 weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the RP Durationbaseline and 4 weeksmin per attackMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)0 and 4 weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Physician's Global Assessment on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)at 0 (baseline) and 4 weeks (after treatment)units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Digital Ulcer Numberbaseline and 4 weeksDigital ulcersMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Peak Systolic Flow (cm/Sec)baseline and 4 weekscm/secMEAN
SECONDARYTime-averaged Peak Velocity (cm/Sec)baseline and 4 weekscm/secMEAN
SECONDARYDorsal-digital-difference.baseline and 4 weeksdegree celcius.MEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
RP Attacks Per DayAmlodipine-0.5Standard Deviation 1.4attacks per day
RP Attacks Per DayUdenafil-0.5Standard Deviation 0.9attacks per day
Change in Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS)Amlodipine-0.5Standard Deviation 1.5units on a scale
Change in Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS)Udenafil-0.3Standard Deviation 1.0units on a scale
Change in the RP DurationAmlodipine-1.1Standard Deviation 5.9min per attack
Change in the RP DurationUdenafil-1.4Standard Deviation 11.4min per attack
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)Amlodipine0.1Standard Deviation 0.4units on a scale
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)Udenafil-0.1Standard Deviation 0.3units on a scale
Change in Physician's Global Assessment on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Amlodipine-0.9Standard Deviation 1.4units on a scale
Change in Physician's Global Assessment on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Udenafil-1.5Standard Deviation 1.6units on a scale

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First Intervention (Week 1-4)STARTEDAmlodipine-Udenafil (AU) Arm15
First Intervention (Week 1-4)STARTEDUdenafil-Amlodipine (UA) Arm14
First Intervention (Week 1-4)COMPLETEDAmlodipine-Udenafil (AU) Arm14
First Intervention (Week 1-4)COMPLETEDUdenafil-Amlodipine (UA) Arm12
First Intervention (Week 1-4)NOT COMPLETEDAmlodipine-Udenafil (AU) Arm1
First Intervention (Week 1-4)NOT COMPLETEDUdenafil-Amlodipine (UA) Arm2
Washout Period (Week 4-5)STARTEDAmlodipine-Udenafil (AU) Arm14
Washout Period (Week 4-5)STARTEDUdenafil-Amlodipine (UA) Arm12
Washout Period (Week 4-5)COMPLETEDAmlodipine-Udenafil (AU) Arm14
Washout Period (Week 4-5)COMPLETEDUdenafil-Amlodipine (UA) Arm12

Adverse events26

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFacial flushingGeneral disordersAmlodipine8268
otherFacial flushingGeneral disordersUdenafil132613
otherFacial edemaGeneral disordersAmlodipine4264
otherFacial edemaGeneral disordersUdenafil102610
otherPeripheral edemaGeneral disordersAmlodipine4264
otherPeripheral edemaGeneral disordersUdenafil6266
otherHeadacheGeneral disordersAmlodipine3263
otherHeadacheGeneral disordersUdenafil3263
otherBlurred visionEye disordersAmlodipine2262
otherBlurred visionEye disordersUdenafil2262

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAmlodipine
Total, all-cause mortalityUdenafil
Total, other adverse eventsAmlodipine1426
Total, other adverse eventsUdenafil1926
Total, serious adverse eventsAmlodipine026
Total, serious adverse eventsUdenafil226

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
24352340DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Amlodipine vs Udenafil: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01280266

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01280266/events?page=2