ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01283139

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sifalimumab in Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

NCT01283139, Phase 2, Completed, MedImmune LLC; results first posted 2016-07-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sifalimumab in Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Trials, record NCT01283139. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01283139

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sifalimumab in Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT number
NCT01283139
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
834 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
MedImmune LLC
Conditions
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Interventions
Sifalimumab 200 mg, Sifalimumab 600 mg, Sifalimumab 1,200 mg, Placebo
First posted
2011-01-25
Last updated
2018-04-19
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-024069-30
Results first posted
2016-07-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])Day 365
SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 points (with increased deoxyribonucleic acid \[DNA\] binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline).
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High ParticipantsDay 365
SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of \>=4 points (with increased DNA binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in BILAG-2004 (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayDay 365Percentage of participants on \>=10 mg/day oral corticosteroids (OCS) at baseline who were able to taper it to \<=7.5 mg/day by Day 365 were recorded.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point Reduction
Day 365
The CLASI consists of two scores, the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. Damage is scored in terms of dyspigmentation and scarring, including scarring alopecia. The percentage of participants with a CLASI activity score \>=10 at baseline who achieved a clinically significant (\>=4-point) reduction at Day 365 were reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleDay 365
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Day 1 up to Week 74
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of investigational product or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of investigational product, for the period extending until the end of participant participation in the study.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Week 61
Laboratory investigations included hematology, serum chemistries and urinalysis parameters. Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in these laboratory investigations recorded as TEAEs were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Week 61Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, weight and respiratory rate. Vital signs abnormalities recorded as TEAEs were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEsDay 1 up to Week 56The 12-lead ECG data were summarized and evaluated. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings as assessed by cardiologist were recorded and reported as TEAEs.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])Day 365The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High ParticipantsDay 365
The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants with positive diagnostic test.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayDay 365
The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants on \>=10 mg/day oral prednisone (or equivalent) at baseline.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 at Baseline Who Achieved a >= 4-point Reduction
Day 365
The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants with a CLASI activity score \>=10 at baseline.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Greater Than 3-Point Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue ScaleDay 365
The mITT population included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had a baseline primary efficacy measurement. Here, N signifies number of participants with a FACIT-fatigue score \<49 at baseline.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Day 1 up to Week 74The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Week 61The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Week 61The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as TEAEsDay 1 up to Week 56The safety population included all participants who received any investigational product.participantsNUMBER

Results by group272

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])Placebo45.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)58.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])Sifalimumab 600 mg56.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI [4])Sifalimumab 1,200 mg59.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High ParticipantsPlacebo42.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High ParticipantsSifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)57.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High ParticipantsSifalimumab 600 mg50.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response in SRI (4) in 4-Gene Interferon Test High ParticipantsSifalimumab 1,200 mg57.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DayPlaceboReduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: Yes6.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants on Greater Than or Equal to 10 mg/Day Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Baseline Who Were Able to Reduce to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/DaySifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)Reduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: Yes8.2percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo108
Overall StudySTARTEDSifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)108
Overall StudySTARTEDSifalimumab 600 mg109
Overall StudySTARTEDSifalimumab 1,200 mg107
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo91
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)90
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSifalimumab 600 mg91
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSifalimumab 1,200 mg92
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg)18

Adverse events500

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo11081
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSifalimumab 200 mg31083
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSifalimumab 600 mg41084
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSifalimumab 1200 mg11071
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo21082
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersSifalimumab 200 mg01080
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersSifalimumab 600 mg61087
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersSifalimumab 1200 mg41074
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo41085
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersSifalimumab 200 mg11081

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalitySifalimumab 200 mg
Total, all-cause mortalitySifalimumab 600 mg
Total, all-cause mortalitySifalimumab 1200 mg
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo93108
Total, other adverse eventsSifalimumab 200 mg94108
Total, other adverse eventsSifalimumab 600 mg96108
Total, other adverse eventsSifalimumab 1200 mg92107
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo19108
Total, serious adverse eventsSifalimumab 200 mg16108

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27009916BACKGROUNDPubMed
31660791DERIVEDPubMed
33687069DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01283139

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01283139/results?page=2