ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01289912

Trial of RAD001 and Neurocognition in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)

NCT01289912, Phase 2, Completed, Mustafa Sahin; results first posted 2018-01-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Trial of RAD001 and Neurocognition in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC). Trials, record NCT01289912. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01289912

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Trial of RAD001 and Neurocognition in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)
NCT number
NCT01289912
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
52 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Mustafa Sahin
Conditions
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
Interventions
RAD001, Placebo
First posted
2011-02-04
Last updated
2018-01-25
Results first posted
2018-01-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryEvaluation of the Safety of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo in Patients With TSC.6 monthsEvaluation of the safety of RAD001 compared with placebo in patients with TSC focusing on NCI CTCAE Grade 3 and 4 adverse events, serious adverse events, and Grade 3 and 4 laboratory toxicities.
PrimaryEvaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.6 months
Baseline and 6 month Timepoint scores are reported for the following primary outcome measures: 1. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4 (PPVT-4; Receptive Language Measure). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range=40-160, higher scores are better. 2. Expressive Vocabulary Test 2 (EVT-2; Expressive Language Measure). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range=40-160, higher scores are better. 3. Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML2; Measure of Verbal Memory and Attention ). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range=1-19, higher scores are better. 4. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II (VABS-II; Measure of Adaptive Behavior). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range = 40-160, higher scores are better. 5. Purdue Pegboard Test (Measure of Fine Motor Speed and Coordination). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range = 40-160, higher scores are better.
PrimaryEvaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.6 months
Scores are reported for baseline and 6 month timepoints on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) subscales below. For all subscales, scores are reported as the mean difference between the study subjects and a normative population matched for age, gender and IQ (e.g., subject subscale score - mean of matched normative group = reported score). Higher scores represent a better outcome. 1. Spatial Span (SSP) (spatial memory span) Range: -3 to 3 2. Spatial Working Memory (working memory) Range: -3 to 3 3. Pattern Recognition Memory (PRM) (visual pattern recognition memory) Range: -3 to 3 4. Spatial Recognition Memory (SRM) (spatial recognition memory) Range: -4 to 4 5. Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) (sustained attention) Range: -4 to 4 6. Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) (spatial planning) Range: -4 to 4 7. Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IDED) (cognitive flexibility) Range: -5 to 5 8. Reaction Time (processing speed) Range: -5 to 5
SecondaryComparison of Absolute Change From Baseline in Frequency of Epileptiform Events Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 monthsComparison of absolute change from baseline in frequency of epileptiform events as recorded on seizure diaries between patients taking RAD001 vs. placebo
SecondaryComparison of Sleep Disturbances Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 monthsComparison of sleep disturbances between patients taking RAD001 vs. placebo, measured by the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) and sleep logs
SecondaryComparison of Autism Spectrum Disorders Features Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 months
Scores for the Baseline and 6 Month Timepoints are reported. The secondary outcome measure was the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Standard scores are reported with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. The range is 40-160 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
SecondaryComparison of Academic Skills Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 months
Scores are reported for Baseline and 6 Month Timepoints. The secondary outcome measure was the Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4), which was used to assess academic skills. The Reading and Math subtests were used. Standard scores are reported which have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 (range=40-160 where higher is better).
SecondaryComparison of Behavioral Problems Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs Placebo6 months
Scores for Baseline and 6 Month Timepoints are reported for the following secondary outcome measures: 1. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) (Measure of executive functions) T-scores are reported, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The range is 30-100 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. 2. Behavioral Assessment System for Children (BASC) (Measure of emotional and behavioral problems) T-scores are reported (mean of 50, SD of 10). The range is 30-100 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. Conversely, on the Adaptive Skills subscale of the BASC, lower scores indicate a poorer outcome. 3. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Includes questions related to emotional symptoms, conduct problems, inattention/hyperactivity, peer relationship problems and prosocial behavior. Responses to these items are summed to comprise a Total Difficulties Score, which ranges from 0-40, with lower scores indicating a better outcome

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYEvaluation of the Safety of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo in Patients With TSC.6 monthsAdverse EventsNUMBER
PRIMARYEvaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.6 monthsunits on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYEvaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.6 monthsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYComparison of Absolute Change From Baseline in Frequency of Epileptiform Events Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 monthsData was not collected reliably and therefore was not analyzed.
SECONDARYComparison of Sleep Disturbances Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 monthsData was not collected reliably and therefore was not analyzed.
SECONDARYComparison of Autism Spectrum Disorders Features Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 monthsunits on a scale (SRS)MEAN
SECONDARYComparison of Academic Skills Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs. Placebo6 monthsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYComparison of Behavioral Problems Between Patients Taking RAD001 vs Placebo6 monthsunits on a scaleMEAN

Results by group142

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Evaluation of the Safety of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo in Patients With TSC.RAD001325Adverse Events
Evaluation of the Safety of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo in Patients With TSC.Placebo147Adverse Events
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.Placebo - BaselinePPVT4 (Receptive Language)86.00Standard Deviation 17.78units on a scale
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.RAD001 - BaselinePPVT4 (Receptive Language)81.06Standard Deviation 23.96units on a scale
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.Placebo - 6 MonthsPPVT4 (Receptive Language)88.54Standard Deviation 17.21units on a scale
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.RAD001 - 6 MonthsPPVT4 (Receptive Language)82.5Standard Deviation 22.32units on a scale
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.Placebo - BaselineEVT2 (Expressive Language)85.47Standard Deviation 12.22units on a scale
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.RAD001 - BaselineEVT2 (Expressive Language)90.00Standard Deviation 21.15units on a scale
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.Placebo - 6 MonthsEVT2 (Expressive Language)89.15Standard Deviation 16.08units on a scale
Evaluation of the Efficacy of RAD001 on Neurocognition in Patients With TSC Compared With Placebo.RAD001 - 6 MonthsEVT2 (Expressive Language)82.55Standard Deviation 21.22units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRAD00132
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo15
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRAD00129
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo13
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRAD0013
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo2

Adverse events126

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConjunctivitisEye disordersRAD0012322
otherConjunctivitisEye disordersPlacebo0150
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRAD0012322
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0150
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersRAD001113218
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo5158
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRAD0014325
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1152
otherStomach ache/pain/upset/irritationGastrointestinal disordersRAD00183211
otherStomach ache/pain/upset/irritationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo6158

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRAD001
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsRAD0013032
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1015
Total, serious adverse eventsRAD001332
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo015

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
RAD001 vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests6

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Intra/Extra Dimensional Set ShiftPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Pattern Recognition MemoryPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Rapid Visual Information ProcessingPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Spatial Recognition MemoryPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Tower PlanningPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Vocabulary TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01289912

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01289912/results?page=2