ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01291173

Forced-dose Titration of SPD489 in Adults With Binge Eating Disorder

NCT01291173, Phase 2, Completed, Shire; results first posted 2012-12-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Forced-dose Titration of SPD489 in Adults With Binge Eating Disorder. Trials, record NCT01291173. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01291173

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Forced-dose Titration of SPD489 in Adults With Binge Eating Disorder
NCT number
NCT01291173
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
271 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shire
Conditions
Binge Eating Disorder
Interventions
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (SPD489), lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (SPD489), lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (SPD489), Placebo
First posted
2011-02-08
Last updated
2021-06-10
Results first posted
2012-12-31
Limitations and caveats
External investigation at a site was initiated for reasons unrelated to the study. Lacking information on the investigation, it was deemed prudent to exclude data from subjects enrolled at site (n=11) from the primary analyses of efficacy and safety.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11Baseline and week 11Binge day is defined as a day during which at least 1 binge episode occurs.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 WeeksBaseline and up to 11 weeksThe number of binge episodes per week as assessed by clinical interview based on subject diary.
Secondary1-Week Binge Response, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Last 7 days on study
The 1-week binge response was defined as either a 1-week remission (a 100% reduction of binge episodes from baseline \[ie, a cessation of binge eating behavior\]), or a marked response (75 to \<100% reduction in binge episodes from baseline), or a moderate response (50 to \<75% reduction in binge episodes from baseline), or a negative/minimal response (\<50% reduction in binge episodes from baseline). The 1-week response was determined at the end of the study utilizing a LOCF approach.
Secondary4-Week Binge ResponseLast 28 days on studySubjects are free from binge episodes for 4 weeks.
SecondaryPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineBaselineCGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)
SecondaryPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Up to 11 Weeksup to 11 weeksCGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Up to 11 WeeksUp to 11 weeks
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (YBOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 11Baseline and week 11
The YBOCS-BE measures the obsession of binge-eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge-eating behaviors. The scale is a clinician-rated, 10-item scale, each item rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). Total scores range from 0 to 40. A score of 0-7 is sub-clinical; 8-15 is mild; 16-23 is moderate; 24-31 is severe; and 32-40 is extreme.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Week 11Baseline and week 11MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Week 11Baseline and week 11
The HAM-A is a rating scale developed to quantify the severity of anxiety symptomatology. It consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe) with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity, and 25-30 moderate to severe, and 31-56 severe anxiety.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11Baseline and week 11Full Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment.Log daysLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 WeeksBaseline and up to 11 weeksFull Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment.Binge EpisodesMEAN
SECONDARY1-Week Binge Response, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Last 7 days on studyFull Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARY4-Week Binge ResponseLast 28 days on studyFull Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineBaseline
Full Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment. (Not all subjects in the FAS had an assessment for this outcome.)
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Up to 11 Weeksup to 11 weeks
Full Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment. (Not all subjects in the FAS had an assessment for this outcome.)
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Up to 11 WeeksUp to 11 weeks
Full Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment. (Not all subjects in the FAS had an assessment for this outcome.)
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (YBOCS-BE) Total Score at Week 11Baseline and week 11Full Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Week 11Baseline and week 11Full Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Week 11Baseline and week 11Full Analysis Set defined as all subjects who had taken at least 1 dose of investigational product and who had 1 post-baseline primary efficacy assessment.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group128

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11Placebo-1.23Standard Error 0.069Log days
Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-1.24Standard Error 0.067Log days
Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-1.49Standard Error 0.066Log days
Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Binge Days Per Week at Week 11Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-1.57Standard Error 0.067Log days
Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 WeeksPlacebo-4.07Standard Deviation 2.718Binge Episodes
Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 WeeksLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg-4.57Standard Deviation 3.266Binge Episodes
Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 WeeksLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg-5.10Standard Deviation 3.026Binge Episodes
Change From Baseline in the Number of Binge Episodes Per Week at Up to 11 WeeksLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg-5.09Standard Deviation 2.586Binge Episodes
1-Week Binge Response, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Placebo1 week remission23Participants
1-Week Binge Response, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg1 week remission28Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo64
Overall StudySTARTEDLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg66
Overall StudySTARTEDLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg65
Overall StudySTARTEDLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg65
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo47
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg52
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg52
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg15

Adverse events120

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo563
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg2266
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg2265
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg2765
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo463
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg1766
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg1365
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg1265
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersPlacebo163
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg766

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3763
Total, other adverse eventsLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg5766
Total, other adverse eventsLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 50 mg5665
Total, other adverse eventsLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 70 mg5365
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo063
Total, serious adverse eventsLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (SPD489) 30 mg266

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25587645DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01291173

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01291173/results?page=2