ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01308580

Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² Compared to 25 mg/m² With Prednisone for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

NCT01308580, Phase 3, Completed, Sanofi; results first posted 2016-10-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² Compared to 25 mg/m² With Prednisone for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. Trials, record NCT01308580. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01308580

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m² Compared to 25 mg/m² With Prednisone for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
NCT number
NCT01308580
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,200 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Cabazitaxel (XRP6258), Prednisone (or Prednisolone)
First posted
2011-03-04
Last updated
2017-04-17
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-022163-35
Results first posted
2016-10-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)From baseline up to death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
OS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the earlier of the last date the participant was known to be alive or the study cut-off date. The cut-off date for the final analysis of OS was the date when the 988th death had been observed. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)From baseline up to tumor progression, PSA progression, pain progression, death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
PFS was evaluated from date of randomization to date of first documentation of any of the events: 1) Radiological tumor progression: as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target lesions, 2) Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression: ≥25% increase over baseline/nadir value if baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL; or 25% increase above the baseline level if baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL \& \<10 ng/mL; or post-baseline value of \>=2 ng/mL, if baseline PSA=0 ng/mL, 3) Pain progression: increase of ≥1 point in median Present Pain Intensity (PPI) from nadir or ≥25% increase in mean analgesic score (AS) from baseline score or requirement of local palliative radiotherapy, 4) Death. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryTime to Tumor ProgressionFrom baseline up to tumor progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Time to Tumor progression was defined as the first occurrence of radiological tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1. Radiological tumor progression was defined at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm) taking as reference the smallest sum while on study, appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non target-lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor ResponseFrom baseline up to DP or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Overall objective tumor response was defined as either a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, as assessed by the investigator. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
SecondaryTime to PSA ProgressionFrom baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)
Time to PSA progression was time interval between randomization \& first occurrence of PSA progression. PSA progression defined as: 1) PSA responders (\>50% decline from baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL): increase of ≥25% (≥2 ng/mL) over nadir value, confirmed by second PSA ≥3 weeks later; 2) PSA non-responders (did not achieve \>50% decline from baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL): increase of ≥25% (≥2 ng/mL) over baseline value, confirmed by second PSA ≥3 weeks later; 3) In participants not eligible for PSA response (baseline PSA \<10 ng/mL): (a) participants with baseline PSA \>0 ng/mL \& \<10 ng/mL: increase in PSA by 25% (≥2 ng/mL) above baseline level, confirmed by second PSA value ≥3 weeks apart; (b) participants with baseline value=0 ng/mL: post-baseline PSA value ≥2 ng/mL. Note (for 1-3): Rise in PSA in first 12 weeks was progression only if met definition above and was associated with other sign of DP or if it continued beyond 12 weeks. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PSA ResponseFrom baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)PSA response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks later in participants with baseline PSA value ≥10 ng/mL.
SecondaryTime to Pain ProgressionFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Pain Progression was defined as an increase of ≥1 point in the median PPI from its nadir confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or ≥25 % increase in the mean AS compared with the baseline score confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or requirement for local palliative radiotherapy. PPI was rated by participant in a diary using a scale of 0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible 5=excruciating. Analgesic use was recorded by the participant in a diary. AS was calculated from the analgesic use data based on a table of analgesic medications, with non-narcotic medications assigned a value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned a value of 4 points. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Pain ResponseFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline median PPI score without increase in AS, or a ≥50% decrease from baseline mean AS without increase in the PPI score, maintained for 2 consecutive evaluations at least 3 weeks apart. Increases in pain during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)
FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P TOI combines physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns sub-scales for a total possible score range of 0 to 104, where higher values represent better HRQoL.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLBaseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)
FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P Total Score sums all 5 sub-scales to give a score in the range of 0 to 156, where higher values represent better HRQoL.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)From baseline up to death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Analysis was performed on Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)From baseline up to tumor progression, PSA progression, pain progression, death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Analysis was performed on ITT population.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Tumor ProgressionFrom baseline up to tumor progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Analysis was performed on ITT population.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor ResponseFrom baseline up to DP or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Analysis was performed on ITT population. Number of participants analyzed= participants evaluable for tumor response with measurable disease at baseline and at least one valid post-baseline value.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to PSA ProgressionFrom baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Analysis was performed on ITT population.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With PSA ResponseFrom baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 48 months)Analysis was performed on ITT population. Number of participants analyzed= participants evaluable for PSA response with PSA value ≥10 ng/mL at baseline and at least one valid post-baseline value.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Pain ProgressionFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)Analysis was performed on ITT population.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Pain ResponseFrom baseline until DP, start of another anti-cancer therapy, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 48 months)
Analysis was performed on ITT population. Number of participants analyzed= participants evaluable for pain response with pain score with median PPI ≥2 and/or mean AS ≥10 points at baseline and at least one valid post-baseline value.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)
FACT-P population included randomized participants who completed FACT-P questionnaire at baseline \& in at least one post-baseline assessment. Number of participants analyzed=participants with evaluable FACT-P TOI for specified outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in FACT-P:Total Score as a Measure of HRQoLBaseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1 (up to 12 weeks)
Analysis was performed on FACT-P population. Number of participants analyzed=participants with evaluable FACT-P Total Score for specified outcome measure. Here, 'n' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group98

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^213.495% Confidence Interval 12.19 to 14.88months
Overall Survival (OS)Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^214.595% Confidence Interval 13.47 to 15.28months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^22.995% Confidence Interval 2.79 to 3.45months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^23.595% Confidence Interval 3.12 to 3.94months
Time to Tumor ProgressionCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^29.095% Confidence Interval 8.38 to 9.79months
Time to Tumor ProgressionCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^29.395% Confidence Interval 8.61 to 9.92months
Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor ResponseCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^218.595% Confidence Interval 13.8 to 23.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor ResponseCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^223.495% Confidence Interval 18.2 to 28.6percentage of participants
Time to PSA ProgressionCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^25.795% Confidence Interval 4.96 to 6.47months
Time to PSA ProgressionCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^26.895% Confidence Interval 6.11 to 7.46months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2598
Overall StudySTARTEDCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2602
Overall StudyTreatedCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2587
Overall StudyTreatedCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2588
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2586
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2595
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^212
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^27

Adverse events488

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^233580
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^251595
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^215580
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^240595
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^274580
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2108595
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^224580
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^232595
otherDysgeusiaNervous system disordersCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^241580
otherDysgeusiaNervous system disordersCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^263595

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2
Total, all-cause mortalityCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2
Total, other adverse eventsCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2450580
Total, other adverse eventsCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2507595
Total, serious adverse eventsCabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2177580
Total, serious adverse eventsCabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2257595

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23228299DERIVEDPubMed
28809610DERIVEDPubMed
29500065DERIVEDPubMed
33740734DERIVEDPubMed
35677318DERIVEDPubMed
42020286DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2 vs Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01308580

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01308580/results?page=2