ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01314417

Treatment of Non-infectious Intermediate and Posterior Uveitis Associated Macular Edema With Intravitreal Methotrexate

NCT01314417, Phase 1, Phase 2, Terminated, National Eye Institute (NEI); results first posted 2013-09-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Treatment of Non-infectious Intermediate and Posterior Uveitis Associated Macular Edema With Intravitreal Methotrexate. Trials, record NCT01314417. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01314417

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Treatment of Non-infectious Intermediate and Posterior Uveitis Associated Macular Edema With Intravitreal Methotrexate
NCT number
NCT01314417
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
2 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Conditions
Non-infectious Intermediate and Posterior Uveitis
Interventions
Methotrexate
First posted
2011-03-14
Last updated
2019-03-27
Results first posted
2013-09-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Treatment Success Within 12 Weeks From Baseline.12 weeks
Treatment success is defined as achieving at least a 1-step decrease in the LogScore scale for central macular thickness. A decrease of at least 1-step on the logOCT scale, where Change in logOCT=log(follow-up thickness/200) - log(baseline thickness/200) is considered clinically significant. A 1-step decrease is equivalent to at least a 20% improvement of central macular thickness and represents greater than twice the variability of retinal thickness measurements (approximately 25-30 µ). Examples of OCT measurements with their corresponding LogScore, where LogScore=10xlogOCT are as follows: LogScore 0 = OCT 200 µm, LogScore 1 = OCT 250 µm, LogScore 2 = OCT 320 µm, LogScore 3 = OCT 400 µm, LogScore 4 = OCT 500 µm, LogScore 5 = OCT 640 µm, LogScore 6 = OCT 800 µm, LogScore 7 = OCT 1000 µm
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 4 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 4
Excess retinal thickening was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 8 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 8
Excess retinal thickening was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 12
Excess retinal thickening was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 16 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 16
Excess retinal thickening was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 20 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 20
Excess retinal thickening was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 24 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 24
Excess retinal thickening was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 4 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 4
Central-subfield macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 8 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 8
Central-subfield macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 12
Central-subfield macular thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria.

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Treatment Success Within 12 Weeks From Baseline.12 weeksParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 4 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 4percentage of change from baselineMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 8 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 8percentage of change from baselineMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 12percentage of change from baselineMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 16 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 16percentage of change from baselineMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 20 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 20percentage of change from baselineMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 24 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 24percentage of change from baselineMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 4 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 4µmMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 8 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 8µmMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and Week 12µmMEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Treatment Success Within 12 Weeks From Baseline.Methotrexate2Participants
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 4 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate7.2Standard Deviation 2.3percentage of change from baseline
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 8 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate9.9Standard Deviation 2.3percentage of change from baseline
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate6.1Standard Deviation 6.6percentage of change from baseline
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 16 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate13.6Standard Deviation 9.3percentage of change from baseline
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 20 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate4.9Standard Deviation 4.4percentage of change from baseline
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Excess Retinal Thickening in the Study Eye at 24 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate10.6Standard Deviation 10.3percentage of change from baseline
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 4 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate60.5Standard Deviation 44.5µm
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 8 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate72.0Standard Deviation 19.8µm
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Macular Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineMethotrexate99.0Standard Deviation 63.6µm

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMethotrexate2
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMethotrexate2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMethotrexate0

Adverse events12

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHypotony of eyeEye disordersMethotrexate122
otherEar InfectionInfections and infestationsMethotrexate121
otherHerpes ZosterInfections and infestationsMethotrexate121
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsMethotrexate121
otherStaphylococcal skin infectionInfections and infestationsMethotrexate121
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsMethotrexate121
otherExcoriationInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsMethotrexate121
otherMusculoskeletal chest painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMethotrexate121
otherTendonitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMethotrexate121
otherPetechiaeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersMethotrexate121

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMethotrexate
Total, other adverse eventsMethotrexate22
Total, serious adverse eventsMethotrexate02

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
16597536BACKGROUNDPubMed
16877081BACKGROUNDPubMed
17011854BACKGROUNDPubMed
18163001BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01314417

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01314417/registered?page=2