ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01318499

Nepafenac 0.3% Two Study

NCT01318499, Phase 2, Completed, Alcon Research; results first posted 2012-12-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Nepafenac 0.3% Two Study. Trials, record NCT01318499. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01318499

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Nepafenac 0.3% Two Study
NCT number
NCT01318499
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
1,342 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Conditions
Cataract
Interventions
Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.3%, Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.1%, Nepafenac Vehicle 0.3%
First posted
2011-03-18
Last updated
2012-12-17
Results first posted
2012-12-17
Limitations and caveats
Study excluded patients who were under the age of 18, had uncontrolled glaucoma, were at risk of developing macular edema (diabetic retinopathy), and women of childbearing potential. Therefore, results may not be generalizable to these populations.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Cured at Day 14, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac Vehicle 0.3%Day 14 postoperative
Ocular inflammation was assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination. Aqueous cells were scored on a 5-unit scale from 0 (none) to 4 (\> 30 cells), and aqueous flare (protein escaping from dilated vessels) was scored on a 4-unit scale from 0 (no visible flare when compared with the normal eye) to 3 (severe - very dense flare). To be considered cured, the patient must have had a score of 0 for both aqueous cells and aqueous flare.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Cured at Day 7, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac 0.1%Day 7 postoperative
Ocular inflammation was assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination. Aqueous cells were scored on a 5-unit scale from 0 (none) to 4 (\> 30 cells), and aqueous flare (protein escaping from dilated vessels) was scored on a 4-unit scale from 0 (no visible flare when compared with the normal eye) to 3 (severe - very dense flare). To be considered cured, the patient must have had a score of 0 for both aqueous cells and aqueous flare.
OtherCumulative Percentage of Patients Cured by VisitDay 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14
Ocular inflammation was assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination. Aqueous cells were scored on a 5-unit scale from 0 (none) to 4 (\> 30 cells), and aqueous flare (protein escaping from dilated vessels) was scored on a 4-unit scale from 0 (no visible flare when compared with the normal eye) to 3 (severe - very dense flare). To be considered cured, the patient must have had a score of 0 for both aqueous cells and aqueous flare. To be included in the cumulative summary at a visit, a patient must have been declared cured at the visit and remained cured at all subsequent visits.
OtherCumulative Percentage of Patients Pain Free by VisitDay 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14
Ocular pain was assessed by the patient on a 6-unit scale from 0 (none; absence of positive sensation), to 5 (severe; intense ocular, periocular or radiating pain requiring prescription analgesic). Pain free was defined as an ocular pain assessment score of 0. To be included in the cumulative summary at a visit, a patient must have been declared pain free at the visit and remained pain free at all subsequent visits.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Patients Cured at Day 14, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac Vehicle 0.3%Day 14 postoperativeAll randomized patients with at least one postoperative assessment (intent-to-treat), last observation carried forward.Percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Cured at Day 7, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac 0.1%Day 7 postoperativeAll randomized patients with at least one postoperative assessment (intent-to-treat), last observation carried forward.Percentage of patientsNUMBER
POST_HOCCumulative Percent Clinical Success by VisitDay 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14All randomized patients with at least one post-operative assessment (intent-to-treat).Percentage of patientsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDCumulative Percentage of Patients Cured by VisitDay 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14All randomized patients with at least one postoperative assessment (intent-to-treat), last observation carried forward.Percentage of patientsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDCumulative Percentage of Patients Pain Free by VisitDay 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14All randomized patients with at least one postoperative assessment (intent-to-treat), last observation carried forward.Percentage of patientsNUMBER

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Patients Cured at Day 14, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac Vehicle 0.3%Nepafenac 0.3%64.6Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Cured at Day 14, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac Vehicle 0.3%Nepafenac Vehicle 0.3%25.0Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Cured at Day 7, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac 0.1%Nepafenac 0.3%31.3Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Cured at Day 7, Nepafenac 0.3% vs. Nepafenac 0.1%Nepafenac 0.1%30.8Percentage of patients
Cumulative Percent Clinical Success by VisitNepafenac 0.3%Day 118.9Percentage of patients
Cumulative Percent Clinical Success by VisitNepafenac 0.1%Day 115.0Percentage of patients
Cumulative Percent Clinical Success by VisitNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%Day 112.3Percentage of patients
Cumulative Percent Clinical Success by VisitNepafenac 0.3%Day 343.9Percentage of patients
Cumulative Percent Clinical Success by VisitNepafenac 0.1%Day 335.9Percentage of patients
Cumulative Percent Clinical Success by VisitNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%Day 318.7Percentage of patients

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDNepafenac 0.3%540
Overall StudySTARTEDNepafenac 0.1%534
Overall StudySTARTEDNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%268
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNepafenac 0.3%475
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNepafenac 0.1%458
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%121
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNepafenac 0.3%65
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNepafenac 0.1%76
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%147

Adverse events33

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousAngle closure glaucomaEye disordersNepafenac 0.3%1522
seriousAngle closure glaucomaEye disordersNepafenac 0.1%0506
seriousAngle closure glaucomaEye disordersNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%0254
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersNepafenac 0.3%1522
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersNepafenac 0.1%0506
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%0254
seriousCorneal abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsNepafenac 0.3%1522
seriousCorneal abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsNepafenac 0.1%0506
seriousCorneal abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%0254
seriousEndophthalmitisInfections and infestationsNepafenac 0.3%1522

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNepafenac 0.3%
Total, all-cause mortalityNepafenac 0.1%
Total, all-cause mortalityNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%
Total, other adverse eventsNepafenac 0.3%0522
Total, other adverse eventsNepafenac 0.1%0506
Total, other adverse eventsNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%0254
Total, serious adverse eventsNepafenac 0.3%5522
Total, serious adverse eventsNepafenac 0.1%4506
Total, serious adverse eventsNepafenac Vehicle 0.3%0254

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01318499

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01318499/results?page=2