ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01325337

Safety and Efficacy Study of Bimatoprost in the Treatment of Men With Androgenic Alopecia

NCT01325337, Phase 2, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2014-04-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy Study of Bimatoprost in the Treatment of Men With Androgenic Alopecia. Trials, record NCT01325337. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01325337

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy Study of Bimatoprost in the Treatment of Men With Androgenic Alopecia
NCT number
NCT01325337
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
307 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Alopecia, Alopecia, Androgenetic, Baldness
Interventions
bimatoprost Formulation A, bimatoprost Formulation B, bimatoprost Formulation C, bimatoprost vehicle solution, minoxidil 5% solution
First posted
2011-03-29
Last updated
2014-04-10
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-000379-15
Results first posted
2014-04-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Baseline, Month 6
TAHC was measured using digital imaging analysis and was reported in terminal hairs/centimeters squared (cm\^2). A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement (increase in the number of terminal hairs).
PrimaryPercentage of Participants in Each Response Category of the Subject Self Assessment in Alopecia (SSA) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
The SSA score measured scalp hair growth. Using a 7-point scale, participants answered the Question: "Since the start of the study, the amount of my hair has?": Greatly Increased, Moderately Increased, Slightly Increased, Remained the Same, Slightly Decreased, Moderately Decreased or Greatly Decreased. The percentage of participants in each response category is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants in Each Response Category of the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
The investigator compared the participant's scalp hair growth at Month 6 to a photograph of the scalp taken at Baseline and using the 7-point IGA score, the investigator answered the question: "Since the start of the study, the amount of the subject's hair has?": Greatly Increased, Moderately Increased, Slightly Increased, Remained the Same, Slightly Decreased, Moderately Decreased or Greatly Decreased. The percentage of participants in each response category is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants in Each Response Category of the Global Panel Review (GPR) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
At the completion of the study, 3 independent dermatologists using the 7-point GPR score compared photographs of the participant's scalp hair growth at Month 6 to Baseline and answered the question: "Compared with the baseline image, the amount of the subject's hair has?": Greatly Increased, Moderately Increased, Slightly Increased, Remained the Same, Slightly Decreased, Moderately Decreased or Greatly Decreased. The percentage of participants in each response category is presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width (TAHW)Baseline, Month 6
Digital imaging analysis was used to measure TAHW in millimeters/centimeters squared (mm/cm\^2). The diameters of all terminal hairs (individual hairs ≥ 30 microns in width) in the target area were summed and reported together. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement (increase in the diameter of terminal hairs).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Darkness (TAHD)Baseline, Month 6
Digital imaging analysis was used to measure TAHD. The darkness of all terminal hairs (individual hairs ≥ 30 microns in width) in the target area were summed and divided by total number of terminal hairs in the same target area and was reported as intensity units. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement (increase in the darkness of terminal hairs).

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Baseline, Month 6
Participants from the Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all randomized participants who received treatment and had both Baseline and post-Baseline measurements) who had data available for this outcome measure.
terminal hairs/cm^2MEAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants in Each Response Category of the Subject Self Assessment in Alopecia (SSA) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
Participants from the Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all randomized participants who received treatment and had both Baseline and post-Baseline measurements) who had data available for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in Each Response Category of the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
Participants from the Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all randomized participants who received treatment and had both Baseline and post-Baseline measurements) who had data available for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in Each Response Category of the Global Panel Review (GPR) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
Participants from the Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all randomized participants who received treatment and had both Baseline and post-Baseline measurements) who had data available for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width (TAHW)Baseline, Month 6
Participants from the Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all randomized participants who received treatment and had both Baseline and post-Baseline measurements) who had data available for this outcome measure.
mm/cm^2MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Darkness (TAHD)Baseline, Month 6
Participants from the Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (all randomized participants who received treatment and had both Baseline and post-Baseline measurements) who had data available for this outcome measure.
Intensity unitsMEAN

Results by group135

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Bimatoprost Formulation ABaseline135.0Standard Deviation 58.80terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Bimatoprost Formulation BBaseline145.7Standard Deviation 57.25terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Bimatoprost Formulation CBaseline151.5Standard Deviation 60.40terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Vehicle to BimatoprostBaseline143.7Standard Deviation 55.42terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Minoxidil 5% SolutionBaseline132.7Standard Deviation 53.14terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Bimatoprost Formulation AChange from Baseline at Month 613.1Standard Deviation 21.69terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Bimatoprost Formulation BChange from Baseline at Month 66.1Standard Deviation 19.80terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Bimatoprost Formulation CChange from Baseline at Month 66.3Standard Deviation 22.05terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Vehicle to BimatoprostChange from Baseline at Month 64.1Standard Deviation 15.59terminal hairs/cm^2
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count (TAHC)Minoxidil 5% SolutionChange from Baseline at Month 621.9Standard Deviation 19.30terminal hairs/cm^2

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBimatoprost Formulation A61
Overall StudySTARTEDBimatoprost Formulation B61
Overall StudySTARTEDBimatoprost Formulation C62
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle to Bimatoprost62
Overall StudySTARTEDMinoxidil 5% Solution61
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBimatoprost Formulation A56
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBimatoprost Formulation B52
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBimatoprost Formulation C53
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle to Bimatoprost52
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMinoxidil 5% Solution53

Adverse events45

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsBimatoprost Formulation A561
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsBimatoprost Formulation B761
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsBimatoprost Formulation C462
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsVehicle to Bimatoprost762
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsMinoxidil 5% Solution361
otherApplication site pruritisGeneral disordersBimatoprost Formulation A161
otherApplication site pruritisGeneral disordersBimatoprost Formulation B461
otherApplication site pruritisGeneral disordersBimatoprost Formulation C062
otherApplication site pruritisGeneral disordersVehicle to Bimatoprost062
otherApplication site pruritisGeneral disordersMinoxidil 5% Solution761

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBimatoprost Formulation A
Total, all-cause mortalityBimatoprost Formulation B
Total, all-cause mortalityBimatoprost Formulation C
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle to Bimatoprost
Total, all-cause mortalityMinoxidil 5% Solution
Total, other adverse eventsBimatoprost Formulation A661
Total, other adverse eventsBimatoprost Formulation B1161
Total, other adverse eventsBimatoprost Formulation C462
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle to Bimatoprost762
Total, other adverse eventsMinoxidil 5% Solution1061

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01325337

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01325337/results?page=2