ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01332318

Simulated Driving Study in Restless Legs Syndrome

NCT01332318, Phase 2, Completed, XenoPort, Inc.; results first posted 2011-06-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Simulated Driving Study in Restless Legs Syndrome. Trials, record NCT01332318. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01332318

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Simulated Driving Study in Restless Legs Syndrome
NCT number
NCT01332318
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
130 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
XenoPort, Inc.
Conditions
Restless Legs Syndrome
Interventions
XP13512, Diphenhydramine, Placebo
First posted
2011-04-11
Last updated
2013-07-26
Results first posted
2011-06-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes28

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)Baseline (Day -1) and Day 16
Lane position variability (LPV) was defined as the standard deviation of lane position, and was measured from the center line of the 26 foot wide 2-lane paved road to the center of the vehicle. Change from baseline in overall LPV was calculated as the Day 16 mean LPV over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline mean LPV over the 1-hour drive. The Day 16 measurement is at the time of maximum concentration (Tmax) for both GEn and DPH.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14 and 15
Lane position variability (LPV) was defined as the standard deviation of lane position, and was measured from the center line of the 26 foot wide 2-lane paved road to the center of the vehicle. Change from baseline in overall LPV was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening) or Day 15 (in the morning after GEn dosed at 5 PM) mean LPV over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Day -1 or Day 1) mean LPV over the 1-hour drive.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average Lane PositionBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16
Lane position was measured from the center line of the 26 foot wide 2-lane paved road to the center of the vehicle. Change from baseline in overall average lane position was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning after GEn dosed at 5 PM), or 16 (assessment at Tmax of GEn and DPH) mean lane position over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean lane position over the 1-hour drive.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Speed VariabilityBaseline (Day -1) and Days 14 and 16; baseline (Day 1) and Day 15
Speed variability was defined as the standard deviation of the speed (measured in miles per hour). Participants were instructed to maintain a speed of 55 miles per hour during the test drive. Change from baseline in overall speed variability was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning), or 16 (at Tmax of GEn and DPH) mean speed variability over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean speed variability over the 1-hour drive.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average SpeedBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16
Participants were instructed to maintain a speed of 55 miles per hour during the driving assessment. Change from baseline in overall average speed was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning), or 16 (at Tmax of GEn and DPH) mean speed over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean speed over the 1-hour drive.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Number of Simulated Crashes on Days 14 (Evening), 15 (Morning After Dose), and 16 (Tmax)Days 14, 15, and 16A simulated crash was defined as a collision with an oncoming car or obstacle (e.g., tree) or when the distance to the center line was greater than 18 feet on either side of the road.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Brake Reaction TimeBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16
Brake reaction time was assessed as the time it took for each participant to move their foot off the accelerator and onto the brake pedal after the appearance of a stop sign on the simulation screen. Change from baseline was calculated as the Day 14, 15, or 16 mean reaction time minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean reaction time.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Alertness Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16
Alertness VAS was completed immediately before and after each simulated driving assessment. Participants indicated their alertness by marking a vertical line on a horizontal scale anchored by responses "extremely sleepy" and "extremely alert." VAS score was determined by measuring the distance in millimeters (mm) from the left hand end of the line to the point the participant marked. Scores ranged from 0-100 mm, with higher scores indicating more alertness and lower scores indicating more sleepiness. Change score was calculated as the Day 14, 15, or 16 VAS score minus the Baseline VAS score.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total ScoreBaseline (Day -1) and Day 14
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire designed to evaluate daytime sleepiness. Participants were asked to rate how likely they were to doze or fall asleep during 8 activities on a scale of 0 ("would never do") to 3 ("high chance of dozing"). The total score ranges from 0-24, with a score greater than 10 representing excessive daytime sleepiness (an increased chance of dozing). Change from baseline was calculated as the Day 14 total score minus the Baseline total score.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Composite ScoreBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16
The BAC was designed as a comprehensive measure of cognitive function, including 6 individual tests: Verbal Memory Recall, Digit Sequencing, Token Motor Task, Verbal Fluency, Symbol Coding, and Tower of London. The composite/total BAC score is calculated by scoring each individual test, comparing each score to a healthy control sample (matched for sex and age category) to create z-scores, summing the z-scores, and rescaling the sum. The composite score range is -2127.8 to 1878.8, with higher scores indicating better cognition.

Outcomes28

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)Baseline (Day -1) and Day 16
Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population: all participants in the Safety Population who completed at least one Baseline and one End of Study (Days 14-16) simulated driving assessment. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.
feetLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14 and 15Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.feetMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average Lane PositionBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.feetMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Speed VariabilityBaseline (Day -1) and Days 14 and 16; baseline (Day 1) and Day 15Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.miles per hourMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average SpeedBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.miles per hourMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With the Indicated Number of Simulated Crashes on Days 14 (Evening), 15 (Morning After Dose), and 16 (Tmax)Days 14, 15, and 16Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Brake Reaction TimeBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.secondsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Alertness Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16
Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. Varying numbers of participants did not complete either the pre- or post-drive VAS at either Baseline or the day of assessment; as such, the number of participants analyzed varies by day.
millimetersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total ScoreBaseline (Day -1) and Day 14Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Populationscores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Composite ScoreBaseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population. The number of participants assessed at each study day varies due to incomplete/missing data.scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group425

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo-0.10Standard Error 0.06feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.15Standard Error 0.06feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.15Standard Error 0.06feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.16Standard Error 0.06feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)GEn Placebo and DPH PlaceboDay 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28-0.06Standard Deviation 0.17feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)GEn 1200 mg and DPH PlaceboDay 14, n=33, 28, 33, 280.17Standard Deviation 0.43feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)GEn 1800 mg and DPH PlaceboDay 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28-0.01Standard Deviation 0.28feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28-0.08Standard Deviation 0.15feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)GEn Placebo and DPH PlaceboDay 15, n=32, 28, 31, 27-0.01Standard Deviation 0.14feet
Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)GEn 1200 mg and DPH PlaceboDay 15, n=32, 28, 31, 270.13Standard Deviation 0.40feet

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo34
Overall StudySTARTEDGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo32
Overall StudySTARTEDGEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo34
Overall StudySTARTEDGEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 1630
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo32
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 1628
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo4

Adverse events56

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo134
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo831
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersGEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo1334
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersGEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16230
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo334
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo531
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersGEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo434
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersGEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16430
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo334
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo431

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo
Total, all-cause mortalityGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo
Total, all-cause mortalityGEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo
Total, all-cause mortalityGEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16
Total, other adverse eventsGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo1034
Total, other adverse eventsGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo1631
Total, other adverse eventsGEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo2134
Total, other adverse eventsGEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 161130
Total, serious adverse eventsGEn Placebo and DPH Placebo034
Total, serious adverse eventsGEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo031

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Category FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition
Tower PlanningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01332318

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01332318/registered?page=2