ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01335009

Efficacy Study of Pharmacokinetic(PK)/Pharmacodynamic(PD) Relationship of Monotherapy MORAb-004 in Metastatic Melanoma

NCT01335009, Phase 2, Completed, Eisai Inc.; results first posted 2021-09-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy Study of Pharmacokinetic(PK)/Pharmacodynamic(PD) Relationship of Monotherapy MORAb-004 in Metastatic Melanoma. Trials, record NCT01335009. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01335009

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy Study of Pharmacokinetic(PK)/Pharmacodynamic(PD) Relationship of Monotherapy MORAb-004 in Metastatic Melanoma
NCT number
NCT01335009
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
76 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Conditions
Metastatic Melanoma
Interventions
MORAb-004 (monoclonal antibody)
First posted
2011-04-13
Last updated
2021-09-01
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-001282-40
Results first posted
2021-09-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24Week 24
PFS was defined as the time (in weeks) from the date of randomization to the date of the first sign of disease progression (PD) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, or date of death, regardless of cause. PD greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) increase in the nadir of total tumor burden (TTB) (minimum 5 millimeter \[mm\]). Participants who were alive with no disease progression had their PFS time censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants who received a new anti-cancer therapy before disease progression had their PFS time censored at the date of their last tumor assessment before the new anti-cancer therapy was started. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PFS at Weeks 16 and 52Week 16 and Week 52
PFS was defined as the time (in weeks) from the date of randomization to the date of the first observation of PD (RECIST version 1.1) or date of death, regardless of the cause. PD \>=20% increase in the nadir of TTB (minimum 5 mm). Participants who were alive with no disease progression had their PFS time censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants who received new anti-cancer therapy before disease progression had their PFS time censored at the date of their last tumor assessment before the new anti-cancer therapy was initiated. PFS was based on the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Date of first study treatment (Day 1) to date of death or up to approximately 2 years 7 months
OS was defined as the time (in weeks) from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of cause. In the absence of death confirmation, or for participants alive at the time of analysis, the survival time was censored at the date of the last study follow-up. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. As per planned analysis, efficacy outcomes was planned to be analyzed until cut-off date (02 December 2013).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall ResponseDate of first study treatment (Day 1) to complete response or partial response, assessed up to approximately 2 years 7 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) that occurred (defined by RECIST version 1.1) using CT/MRI. Per RECIST 1.1, CR= disappearance of all lesions; PR greater than or equal to (\>=) 30percent (%) decrease from baseline in TTB. As per planned analysis, efficacy outcomes was planned to be analyzed until cut-off date (02 December 2013).
SecondaryOptimal Biologic Dosing (OBD) of Morab-004Day 1 Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)
OBD is defined as the dose level/exposure level at which three parameters are met: 1) adequate pharmacokinetic (PK) profile with a serum half-life (t1/2) of \>=48 hours, 2) at least minimal demonstration of antitumor efficacy (50% or greater PFS rate at 16 weeks), and 3) change of 25% or greater from baseline value in any of the pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters assessed in the study in 30% of participants at that dose level.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24Week 24
Primary efficacy population included all participants in the safety population who meet all key eligibility criteria (including measurable disease at baseline after at least 1 systemic treatment) analyzed by the dose level to which they were randomized.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With PFS at Weeks 16 and 52Week 16 and Week 52
Primary efficacy population included all participants in the safety population who meet all key eligibility criteria (including measurable disease at baseline after at least 1 systemic treatment) analyzed by the dose level to which they were randomized.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Date of first study treatment (Day 1) to date of death or up to approximately 2 years 7 months
Primary efficacy population included all participants in the safety population who meet all key eligibility criteria (including measurable disease at baseline after at least 1 systemic treatment) analyzed by the dose level to which they were randomized. Participants without documentation of death at the time of analysis were censored at the date last known to be alive.
weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Overall ResponseDate of first study treatment (Day 1) to complete response or partial response, assessed up to approximately 2 years 7 months
ORR population included a subset of participants from the primary efficacy population who had at least 1 on-study radiologic evaluation performed (in addition to their baseline evaluation), analyzed by the dose level received.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOptimal Biologic Dosing (OBD) of Morab-004Day 1 Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)
All participants in the safety population who receive at least one dose of MORAb-004 and who had at least one on-treatment PK/PD assessment performed that is sufficient to evaluate the endpoint of interest. Here overall number of participants analyzed are participants who were available for this outcome measure.
milligram(s)NUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24MORAb-004 2 mg/kg13.595% Confidence Interval 5.0 to 26.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24MORAb-004 4 mg/kg8.995% Confidence Interval 2.3 to 21.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PFS at Weeks 16 and 52MORAb-004 2 mg/kgWeek 1632.595% Confidence Interval 18.3 to 47.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PFS at Weeks 16 and 52MORAb-004 4 mg/kgWeek 1620.895% Confidence Interval 9.2 to 35.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PFS at Weeks 16 and 52MORAb-004 2 mg/kgWeek 52NA95% Confidence Interval NA to NApercentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PFS at Weeks 16 and 52MORAb-004 4 mg/kgWeek 528.995% Confidence Interval 2.3 to 21.3percentage of participants
Overall Survival (OS)MORAb-004 2 mg/kg40.995% Confidence Interval 29.0 to 53.3weeks
Overall Survival (OS)MORAb-004 4 mg/kg29.395% Confidence Interval 22.9 to 35.4weeks
Percentage of Participants With Overall ResponseMORAb-004 2 mg/kgNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NApercentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall ResponseMORAb-004 4 mg/kg3.195% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 9.2percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMORAb-004 2 mg/kg40
Overall StudySTARTEDMORAb-004 4 mg/kg36
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMORAb-004 2 mg/kg9
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMORAb-004 4 mg/kg3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMORAb-004 2 mg/kg31
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMORAb-004 4 mg/kg33

Adverse events498

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFatigueGeneral disordersMORAb-004 2 mg/kg184028
otherFatigueGeneral disordersMORAb-004 4 mg/kg183628
otherChillsGeneral disordersMORAb-004 2 mg/kg134013
otherChillsGeneral disordersMORAb-004 4 mg/kg183620
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersMORAb-004 2 mg/kg94011
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersMORAb-004 4 mg/kg123617
otherInfusion related reactionGeneral disordersMORAb-004 2 mg/kg4404
otherInfusion related reactionGeneral disordersMORAb-004 4 mg/kg1363
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersMORAb-004 2 mg/kg4404
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersMORAb-004 4 mg/kg3366

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMORAb-004 2 mg/kg2840
Total, all-cause mortalityMORAb-004 4 mg/kg3236
Total, other adverse eventsMORAb-004 2 mg/kg4040
Total, other adverse eventsMORAb-004 4 mg/kg3636
Total, serious adverse eventsMORAb-004 2 mg/kg1740
Total, serious adverse eventsMORAb-004 4 mg/kg1636

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
MORAb-004 2 mg/kg vs MORAb-004 4 mg/kg: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
MORAb-004 2 mg/kg vs MORAb-004 4 mg/kg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01335009

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01335009/events?page=2