ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01340014

Patient Preference Comparison of AZARGA Versus COSOPT

NCT01340014, Phase 4, Completed, Alcon Research; results first posted 2013-12-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Patient Preference Comparison of AZARGA Versus COSOPT. Trials, record NCT01340014. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01340014

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Patient Preference Comparison of AZARGA Versus COSOPT
NCT number
NCT01340014
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
112 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Conditions
Open-Angle Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Interventions
Brinzolamide 1.0% + Timolol 0.5% ophthalmic suspension, Dorzolamide 2.0% + Timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution
First posted
2011-04-21
Last updated
2014-02-10
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-024244-15
Results first posted
2013-12-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPreferred TreatmentAt the end of both periods, Day 15
The participant completed a questionnaire on the Day 15 visit (ie, after administration of both study medications) consisting of a single preference question: "Thinking about the comfort of the two medications (1st and 2nd) that you took during this study, which medication do you prefer?" Preferred treatment is presented as a percentage.
SecondaryOcular DiscomfortDay 7 of each periodOcular discomfort was assessed by the participant 1 minute after instillation of the study medication. Ocular discomfort was rated on a 10-point scale (0=no discomfort, 9=substantial discomfort).

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPreferred TreatmentAt the end of both periods, Day 15This reporting group includes all participants who completed both treatment periods and completed the preference questionnaire, as treated.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOcular DiscomfortDay 7 of each periodThis reporting group includes all participants who completed both treatment periods and completed the preference questionnaire, as treated, minus any missing responses.Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Preferred TreatmentAZARGA60.2Percentage of participants
Preferred TreatmentCOSOPT39.8Percentage of participants
Ocular DiscomfortAZARGA2.6Standard Deviation 2.27Units on a scale
Ocular DiscomfortCOSOPT3.7Standard Deviation 2.63Units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Period 1, First 7 DaysSTARTEDAZARGA/COSOPT55
Period 1, First 7 DaysSTARTEDCOSOPT/AZARGA57
Period 1, First 7 DaysCOMPLETEDAZARGA/COSOPT53
Period 1, First 7 DaysCOMPLETEDCOSOPT/AZARGA57
Period 1, First 7 DaysNOT COMPLETEDAZARGA/COSOPT2
Period 1, First 7 DaysNOT COMPLETEDCOSOPT/AZARGA0
Period 2, Second 7 DaysSTARTEDAZARGA/COSOPT53
Period 2, Second 7 DaysSTARTEDCOSOPT/AZARGA57
Period 2, Second 7 DaysCOMPLETEDAZARGA/COSOPT53
Period 2, Second 7 DaysCOMPLETEDCOSOPT/AZARGA56

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAZARGA
Total, all-cause mortalityCOSOPT
Total, other adverse eventsAZARGA0112
Total, other adverse eventsCOSOPT0112
Total, serious adverse eventsAZARGA0112
Total, serious adverse eventsCOSOPT0112

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
AZARGA vs COSOPT: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01340014

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01340014/registered