ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01340651

Study of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) Sustained Release Formulation in Myelofibrosis Patients

NCT01340651, Phase 2, Completed, Incyte Corporation; results first posted 2013-09-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) Sustained Release Formulation in Myelofibrosis Patients. Trials, record NCT01340651. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01340651

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) Sustained Release Formulation in Myelofibrosis Patients
NCT number
NCT01340651
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
41 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Conditions
Myelofibrosis
Interventions
Ruxolitinib
First posted
2011-04-22
Last updated
2014-03-10
Results first posted
2013-09-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event From Baseline Through Week 16Baseline to Week 16
PrimaryOverall Response (OR) at Week 16Baseline to Week 16
The investigator graded OR according to the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Therapy criteria for treatment response. As bone marrow biopsies were not taken after baseline, the best achievable response was clinical improvement which required 1 of the following in the absence of progressive disease (PD): (1) A ≥ 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin level or (2) either a palpable ≥ 50% reduction of splenomegaly of a spleen ≥ 10 cm at baseline or a spleen palpable at \> 5 cm at baseline becoming not palpable. PD required 1 of the following: (1) Progressive splenomegaly defined by the appearance of previously absent splenomegaly that was palpable at \> 5 cm below the left costal margin or a ≥ 100% increase in palpable distance for baseline splenomegaly of 5-10 cm or a ≥ 50% increase in palpable distance for baseline splenomegaly of \> 10 cm or (2) an increase in peripheral blood blast percentage to ≥ 20% that lasted for ≥ 8 weeks. Stable disease: None of the above.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 16Baseline to Week 16
Spleen volume was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (or by computed tomography \[CT\] in applicable participants). Scans were read by a central reader. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Spleen Length at Week 16Baseline to Week 16Spleen length was measured in centimeters by palpation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 16 From BaselineBaseline to Week 16
Spleen volume was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (or by computed tomography \[CT\] in applicable participants). Scans were read by a central reader. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Total Symptom Score at Week 16Baseline to Week 16
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v2.0 diary that was to be completed by participants each night. The 7 symptoms (night sweats, itchiness, abdominal pain, pain under the ribs on left side, feeling of fullness \[early satiety\], bone/muscle pain, inactivity) were each rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The total symptom score was the sum of 6 of the 7 symptoms (inactivity was not included) and ranged from 0 to 60. A lower score indicated fewer symptoms. A negative change score indicated improvement.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in the Total Symptom Score at Week 16Baseline to Week 16
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v2.0 diary that was to be completed by participants each night. The 7 symptoms (night sweats, itchiness, abdominal pain, pain under the ribs on left side, feeling of fullness \[early satiety\], bone/muscle pain, inactivity) were each rated on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The total symptom score was the sum of 6 of the 7 symptoms (inactivity was not included) and ranged from 0 to 60. A lower score indicated fewer symptoms.
SecondaryMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1Day 1
Blood samples were collected prior to and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 hours after administration of ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1 of the study. The concentration of ruxolitinib was determined in plasma samples by a validated LC/MS/MS assay. Standard non-compartmental pharmacokinetic methods were used to analyze the ruxolitinib plasma concentration data using WinNonlin® version 6.0.0 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA). Cmax was taken directly from the observed plasma concentration data.
SecondaryTime to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1Day 1
Blood samples were collected prior to and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 hours after administration of ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1 of the study. The concentration of ruxolitinib was determined in plasma samples by a validated LC/MS/MS assay. Standard noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods were used to analyze the ruxolitinib plasma concentration data using WinNonlin® version 6.0.0 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA). Tmax was taken directly from the observed plasma concentration data.
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1Day 1
Blood samples were collected prior to and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 hours after administration of ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1 of the study. The concentration of ruxolitinib was determined in plasma samples by a validated LC/MS/MS assay. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was derived from the plasma concentrations using a non-compartmental method and computed using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the log-trapezoidal rule for decreasing concentrations with the software WinNonlin® version 6.0.0 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA).

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event From Baseline Through Week 16Baseline to Week 16Safety population: All enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYOverall Response (OR) at Week 16Baseline to Week 16Intent-to-treat population: All enrolled participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 16Baseline to Week 16Intent-to-treat population: All enrolled participants.Percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Spleen Length at Week 16Baseline to Week 16Intent-to-treat population: All enrolled participants.Percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 16 From BaselineBaseline to Week 16Intent-to-treat population: All enrolled participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Total Symptom Score at Week 16Baseline to Week 16Intent-to-treat population: All enrolled participants.Percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in the Total Symptom Score at Week 16Baseline to Week 16Intent-to-treat population: All enrolled participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1Day 1Pharmacokinetic evaluable participants: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 plasma sample.nMMEAN
SECONDARYTime to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1Day 1Pharmacokinetic evaluable participants: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 plasma sample.hMEDIAN
SECONDARYArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1Day 1Pharmacokinetic evaluable participants: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 plasma sample.nM*hMEAN

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event From Baseline Through Week 16Ruxolitinib78.0Percentage of participants
Overall Response (OR) at Week 16RuxolitinibClinical improvement17.1Percentage of participants
Overall Response (OR) at Week 16RuxolitinibStable disease80.5Percentage of participants
Overall Response (OR) at Week 16RuxolitinibProgressive disease2.4Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 16Ruxolitinib-22.3Standard Deviation 20.79Percentage change
Change From Baseline in Spleen Length at Week 16Ruxolitinib-29.6Standard Deviation 34.38Percentage change
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 16 From BaselineRuxolitinib26.895% Confidence Interval 14.2 to 42.9Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in the Total Symptom Score at Week 16Ruxolitinib-50.4Standard Deviation 31.16Percentage change
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in the Total Symptom Score at Week 16Ruxolitinib43.995% Confidence Interval 28.5 to 60.3Percentage of participants
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ruxolitinib 25 mg SR on Day 1Ruxolitinib319Standard Deviation 119nM

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRuxolitinib41
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRuxolitinib24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRuxolitinib17

Adverse events66

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-16841
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib - After Week 16441
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-16341
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib - After Week 16041
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-16741
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersRuxolitinib - After Week 16041
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-16741
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib - After Week 16041
otherBone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-16441
otherBone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersRuxolitinib - After Week 16041

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-16
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib - After Week 16
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-162741
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib - After Week 16941
Total, serious adverse eventsRuxolitinib - Weeks 1-16641
Total, serious adverse eventsRuxolitinib - After Week 16941

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Ruxolitinib - Weeks 1-16 vs Ruxolitinib - After Week 16: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01340651

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01340651/events?page=2