ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01342367

Feasibility of Hormones and Radiation for Intermediate or High Risk Prostate Cancer

NCT01342367, Not applicable, Active not recruiting, University of Chicago; results first posted 2021-10-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Feasibility of Hormones and Radiation for Intermediate or High Risk Prostate Cancer. Trials, record NCT01342367. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01342367

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Feasibility of Hormones and Radiation for Intermediate or High Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT number
NCT01342367
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
74 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Bicalutamide, Dutasteride, Finasteride, Radiation
First posted
2011-04-27
Last updated
2025-06-10
Results first posted
2021-10-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryQuality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireBaseline, 6 months, and 24 months
Questionnaires were completed in writing by the patient. Questionnaires were administered at 1-2 months after initiation of hormonal treatment (before RT), at 3-4 months (during RT), and at 6 months after initiation of study therapy. Patients also completed questionnaires at 12, 18, and 24 months after completion of radiation therapy. Of primary interest were the baseline and 6 month and 24 month timepoints which are reported here. Scale scores could range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Free From Biochemical Failure4 years
Increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured over time. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was defined from the time of enrollment until PSA failure occurs as defined by the Phoenix definition of a rise to 2 ng/mL above the nadir PSA value.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYQuality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireBaseline, 6 months, and 24 monthsscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Free From Biochemical Failure4 yearspercentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireSOC CohortBaseline92Standard Deviation 0.04score on a scale
Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireOral ADT GroupBaseline89Standard Deviation 0.04score on a scale
Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireSOC Cohort6 month81Standard Deviation 0.07score on a scale
Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireOral ADT Group6 month88Standard Deviation 0.07score on a scale
Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireSOC Cohort24 month83Standard Deviation 0.05score on a scale
Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireOral ADT Group24 month84Standard Deviation 0.05score on a scale
Percentage of Participants Free From Biochemical FailureSOC Cohort81percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Free From Biochemical FailureOral ADT Group88percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSOC Cohort32
Overall StudySTARTEDOral ADT Group42
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSOC Cohort30
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOral ADT Group40
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSOC Cohort2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOral ADT Group2

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherGI ToxicityGastrointestinal disordersSOC Cohort103010
otherGI ToxicityGastrointestinal disordersOral ADT Group124012
otherGU toxicityRenal and urinary disordersSOC Cohort143014
otherGU toxicityRenal and urinary disordersOral ADT Group184018
seriousGI ToxicityGastrointestinal disordersSOC Cohort2302
seriousGI ToxicityGastrointestinal disordersOral ADT Group2402

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySOC Cohort830
Total, all-cause mortalityOral ADT Group740
Total, other adverse eventsSOC Cohort1430
Total, other adverse eventsOral ADT Group1840
Total, serious adverse eventsSOC Cohort230
Total, serious adverse eventsOral ADT Group240

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
SOC Cohort vs Oral ADT Group: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
SOC Cohort vs Oral ADT Group: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01342367

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01342367/registered