ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01359735

Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients

NCT01359735, Phase 2, Completed, Healthpoint; results first posted 2017-06-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients. Trials, record NCT01359735. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01359735

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients
NCT number
NCT01359735
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
8 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Healthpoint
Conditions
Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
Interventions
HP802-247, Bacitracin Ointment
First posted
2011-05-25
Last updated
2017-06-29
Results first posted
2017-06-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).13 weeks- The IGAH was measured at study Weeks 4 and 13
The IGAH is a four-point scale based on the following assessment scores: 0 = not effective, 1 = slightly effective, 2 = moderately effective, 3 = very effective. The descriptive statistics for both a continuous variable and a categorical variable were summarized for IGAH by treatment week and treatment endpoint. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test the difference in IGAH score between HP802-247 and bacitracin ointment for each treatment week and treatment endpoint. Since this was a small and exploratory study, the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.
SecondaryThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Over 12 weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first. Following completion of treatment subjects were followed for a further 4 weeksComplete wound closure was assessed at each evaluation visit.
SecondaryTime in Days to Wound ClosureOver the 12 week treatment periodThe Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the mean time in days to complete wound closure.
SecondaryInvestigator Reported Signs and SymptomsAt each evaluation visit: Weeks 3 and 12 post-surgery.
Investigator reported signs and/or symptoms, based on the following 12 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): Erythema, Erosion, Ulceration, Swelling, Scarring, Infection, Crusting, Necrosis, Peeling, Contact Dermatitis, Hyper/Hypopigmentation. Item scores were averaged.
SecondarySubject Reported Signs and SymptomsAt each evaluation visit: Weeks 3, and 12 post-surgery.
Subjects reported signs or symptoms, based on the following 6 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): irritation, itchiness, burning, tenderness, pain, and stinging. Item scores were averaged.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).13 weeks- The IGAH was measured at study Weeks 4 and 13The ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Over 12 weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first. Following completion of treatment subjects were followed for a further 4 weeks
The ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS. Fisher's exact test was used to examine the difference in proportion of subjects with complete wound closure at each of the corresponding time points between the two treatment groups, and the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime in Days to Wound ClosureOver the 12 week treatment periodThe ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS. The Log-rank test was used to test for an inter-group difference.DaysMEAN
SECONDARYInvestigator Reported Signs and SymptomsAt each evaluation visit: Weeks 3 and 12 post-surgery.
The ITT population-all subjects who underwent MMS. Both total score and individual item score of the two signs and symptoms rating scales summarized descriptively at Weeks 4, 7, and 13 as well as at the treatment endpoint and compared using a two-sample t-test. the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSubject Reported Signs and SymptomsAt each evaluation visit: Weeks 3, and 12 post-surgery.
The ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS. Both the total score and individual item score of the two signs and symptoms rating scales were summarized descriptively at Weeks 4, 7, and 13 as well as at the treatment endpoint and compared using a two-sample t-test, and the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.
units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).HP802-247Week 042.75Standard Deviation 0.5units on a scale
The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).Bacitracin OintmentWeek 042.25Standard Deviation 0.96units on a scale
The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).HP802-247Week 133.00Standard Deviation 0units on a scale
The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).Bacitracin OintmentWeek 133.00Standard Deviation 0units on a scale
The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.HP802-247Week 010participants
The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Bacitracin OintmentWeek 010participants
The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.HP802-247Week 020participants
The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Bacitracin OintmentWeek 020participants
The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.HP802-247Week 030participants
The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Bacitracin OintmentWeek 030participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDHP802-2474
Overall StudySTARTEDBacitracin Ointment4
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDHP802-2474
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBacitracin Ointment4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDHP802-2470
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBacitracin Ointment0

Adverse events16

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsHP802-247040
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsBacitracin Ointment141
otherArthropod stingInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsHP802-247040
otherArthropod stingInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsBacitracin Ointment141
otherBasal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)HP802-247040
otherBasal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Bacitracin Ointment141
otherMelanocytic naevusNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)HP802-247141
otherMelanocytic naevusNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Bacitracin Ointment040
otherSeborrhoeic keratosisNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)HP802-247141
otherSeborrhoeic keratosisNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Bacitracin Ointment141

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityHP802-247
Total, all-cause mortalityBacitracin Ointment
Total, other adverse eventsHP802-24724
Total, other adverse eventsBacitracin Ointment34
Total, serious adverse eventsHP802-24704
Total, serious adverse eventsBacitracin Ointment04

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
HP802-247 vs Bacitracin Ointment: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01359735

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01359735/results?page=2