Trial ยท NCT01360554
ARCHER 1009 : A Study Of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) Vs. Erlotinib In The Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01360554, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2017-05-24
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. ARCHER 1009 : A Study Of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) Vs. Erlotinib In The Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Trials, record NCT01360554. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01360554
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- ARCHER 1009 : A Study Of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) Vs. Erlotinib In The Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- NCT number
- NCT01360554
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 878 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Interventions
- Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), Active Comparator (erlotinib), Placebo erlotinib, Placebo PF00299804
- First posted
- 2011-05-25
- Last updated
- 2017-05-24
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2010-022656-22
- Results first posted
- 2017-05-24
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes17
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. |
| Primary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review in KRAS Wild-type (WT) Participants. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status. |
| Secondary | PFS Based on Investigator Review. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Investigator's Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. |
| Secondary | PFS Based on Investigator Review in KRAS-WT Participants. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Investigator's Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status. |
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS). | From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months. | OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive (ie, at their last known alive date from long term follow-up). |
| Secondary | OS in KRAS-WT Participants. | From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months. | OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive (ie, at their last known alive date from long term follow-up). Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status. |
| Secondary | Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Independent Radiologic Review. | From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | The BOR was the best response per RECIST (version 1.1) criteria as assessed by independent assessment recorded from randomization until disease progression. Per RECIST version 1.1: Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis\<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; Partial Response (PR): \>=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): \>=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. |
| Secondary | BOR Per Investigator Review. | From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | The BOR was the best response per RECIST (version 1.1) criteria as assessed by investigator assessment recorded from randomization until disease progression. Per RECIST version 1.1: CR: disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis\<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PR: \>=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. |
| Secondary | Duration of Response (DR) Based on Independent Radiologic Review. | From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | DR was defined as the time from first documentation of response assessed by independent review (CR or PR whichever occurred first) to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST version 1.1: CR: disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis\<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PR: \>=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. |
| Secondary | DR Based on Investigator Review. | From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | DR was defined as the time from first documentation of response assessed by investigator review (CR or PR whichever occurred first) to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST version 1.1: CR: disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis\<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PR: \>=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. |
1 to 10 of 17Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 17 registered outcomesOutcomes17
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | The ITT population included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Months | MEDIAN |
| PRIMARY | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review in KRAS Wild-type (WT) Participants. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | ITT population for KRAS-WT participants: all participants who were confirmed as having KRAS-WT tumors, randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | PFS Based on Investigator Review. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | The ITT population included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | PFS Based on Investigator Review in KRAS-WT Participants. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | ITT population for KRAS-WT participants: all participants who were confirmed as having KRAS-WT tumors, randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Overall Survival (OS). | From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months. | The ITT population included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | OS in KRAS-WT Participants. | From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months. | ITT population for KRAS-WT participants: all participants who were confirmed as having KRAS-WT tumors, randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Independent Radiologic Review. | From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | The ITT population included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | BOR Per Investigator Review. | From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | The ITT population included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether patients received study drug or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. | Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Duration of Response (DR) Based on Independent Radiologic Review. | From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | DR was analyzed for a subgroup of participants in the ITT population, who had an objective tumor response. | Months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | DR Based on Investigator Review. | From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy. | DR was analyzed for a subgroup of participants in the ITT population, who had an objective tumor response. | Months | MEDIAN |
1 to 10 of 17Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 17 outcomesResults by group100
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review. | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 2.6 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.9 to 2.8 | Months | |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review. | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 2.5 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.9 to 2.8 | Months | |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review in KRAS Wild-type (WT) Participants. | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 2.6 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.9 to 2.9 | Months | |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review in KRAS Wild-type (WT) Participants. | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 2.5 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.9 to 3.0 | Months | |
| PFS Based on Investigator Review. | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 1.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.9 to 2.6 | Months | |
| PFS Based on Investigator Review. | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 1.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 2.1 | Months | |
| PFS Based on Investigator Review in KRAS-WT Participants. | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 1.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 2.7 | Months | |
| PFS Based on Investigator Review in KRAS-WT Participants. | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 1.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 2.6 | Months | |
| Overall Survival (OS). | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 7.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 6.8 to 9.0 | Months | |
| Overall Survival (OS). | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 8.3 | 95% Confidence Interval 7.4 to 9.7 | Months |
1 to 10 of 100Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 100 results by groupParticipant flow8
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 439 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 439 | |
| Overall Study | Treated | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 436 | |
| Overall Study | Treated | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 436 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 0 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 0 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 439 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 439 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events552
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 35 | 436 | |
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 43 | 436 | |
| other | Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 5 | 436 | |
| other | Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 10 | 436 | |
| other | Dry eye | Eye disorders | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 16 | 436 | |
| other | Dry eye | Eye disorders | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 5 | 436 | |
| other | Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 21 | 436 | |
| other | Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 19 | 436 | |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 21 | 436 | |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 20 | 436 |
1 to 10 of 552Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 552 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 424 | 436 |
| Total, other adverse events | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 417 | 436 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) | 178 | 436 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo) | 169 | 436 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers3
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons1
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison |
|---|
| Arm A (Blinded Dacomitinib and Blinded Erlotinib Placebo) vs Arm B (Blinded Erlotinib and Blinded Dacomitinib Placebo): serious adverse events |
Source Trial comparisons
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01360554
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01360554/results?page=2