ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01369498

Results by group114

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Reduction at Week 24 From Baseline in the Bone Marrow Fibrosis ScoreStage 1: SIM 200 mg090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 23.8percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Reduction at Week 24 From Baseline in the Bone Marrow Fibrosis ScoreStage 1: SIM 700 mg16.790% Confidence Interval 3.0 to 43.8percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Reduction at Week 24 From Baseline in the Bone Marrow Fibrosis ScoreStage 2: SIM 200 mg+Ruxolitinib6.790% Confidence Interval 0.3 to 27.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Reduction at Week 24 From Baseline in the Bone Marrow Fibrosis ScoreStage 2: SIM 700 mg+Ruxolitinib13.390% Confidence Interval 2.4 to 36.3percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 1: SIM 200 mgWeek 12090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 1: SIM 700 mgWeek 12090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 2: SIM 200 mg+RuxolitinibWeek 12090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 28.3percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 2: SIM 700 mg+RuxolitinibWeek 12090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 1: SIM 200 mgWeek 24090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 1: SIM 700 mgWeek 24090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 2: SIM 200 mg+RuxolitinibWeek 24090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 28.3percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 2: SIM 700 mg+RuxolitinibWeek 24090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 1: SIM 200 mgAny Time Post-Baseline090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 1: SIM 700 mgAny Time Post-Baseline090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 2: SIM 200 mg+RuxolitinibAny Time Post-Baseline11.190% Confidence Interval 0.6 to 42.9percentage of participants
Rate of Clinical Response as Defined by the Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin, Platelet, or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)Stage 2: SIM 700 mg+RuxolitinibAny Time Post-Baseline090% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 25.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Stage 1: SIM 200 mg100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Stage 1: SIM 700 mg100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Stage 2: SIM 200 mg+Ruxolitinib100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Stage 2: SIM 700 mg+Ruxolitinib100percentage of participants

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01369498/results