ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01374451

Efficacy of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAR in Advanced PNET

NCT01374451, Phase 2, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2016-12-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAR in Advanced PNET. Trials, record NCT01374451. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01374451

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAR in Advanced PNET
NCT number
NCT01374451
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
160 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Islet Cell Tumor
Interventions
Everolimus, Pasireotide LAR
First posted
2011-06-16
Last updated
2016-12-20
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-023183-40
Results first posted
2016-12-20
Limitations and caveats
A planned primary analysis was completed with data cut of 02-Apr-2014. The study did not meet its primary objective, which was based on progression-free survival as per local radiology assessment and was prematurely terminated.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) Per Local Radiological ReviewOnce 80 PFS events had occurred aproximately after 24 months
PFS per RECIST 1.0. (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause.
SecondarySafety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAROnce 80 PFS events had occurred
Consisted of monitoring and recording the rate, type, severity, and causal relationship of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) to treatment. The safety analysis was based mainly on the frequency of AEs or SAEs and on the number of laboratory values that fell outside of pre-determined range.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Radiology ReviewOnce 80 PFS events had occurred
Objective response was determined by the local radiologist according to the RECIST Version 1.0. ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). This is also referred to as Overall response rate. CR: Disappearance of all nontarget lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DoR)Once 80 PFS events had occurred
80 PFS are expected after approximately 24 months. Kaplan Meier was initially planned to be used to depict duration of response by treatment group and by stratum. Later based on the mode of action of everolimus and pasireotide and based on study experience, only a low number of objective responses per RECIST were expected. Therefore, protocol was amended to only list duration of response, and confirmed responses were flagged in the listing. Hence, statistical analyses were not planned and such data are not available for the following table.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) Using Kaplan Meier MethodOnce 80 PFS events had occurred
Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. If a patient is not known to have died, survival was to be censored at the date of last contact.
SecondaryPFS and the Predictive Probability of Success in Phase IIIOnce 105 PFS events had occurred occurred105 PFS events expected after approximately 36 months
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Radiology ReviewOnce 80 PFS events had occurred
Disease control rate is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of CR or PR or stable disease (SD) determined by the local radiologist according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) Version 1.0. CR: Disappearance of all nontarget lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease (PD). PD: Any progression ≤ 18 weeks after randomization (and not qualifying for CR, PR or stable disease SD.
SecondarySummary of Pharmacokinetics (PK) for Everolimus for AUClastCycle 2 Day 1
SecondarySummary of Pharmacokinetics (PK) for Everolimus for CL/FCycle 2 Day 1
SecondarySummary of Pharmacokinetics (PK) for Everolimus for Cmax and CminCycle 2 Day 1

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) Per Local Radiological ReviewOnce 80 PFS events had occurred aproximately after 24 months
The FAS consisted of all randomized patients. Following the intention to treat principle patients were analyzed according to the treatment (and stratum) they were assigned to at randomization.~One patient in the everolimus + pasireotide LAR treatment arm was untreated due to administrative problems.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYSafety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAROnce 80 PFS events had occurred
Safety analysis population included all patients who received any study medication (i.e. at least 1 dose of the study drug in case of monotherapy or at least 1 dose of any 1 compound of the study treatment in case of a combination therapy) with a post-Baseline safety assessment.~See Adverse Events (AE) section for all AEs collected.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Radiology ReviewOnce 80 PFS events had occurred
The FAS consisted of all randomized patients.1 patient in the everolimus + pasireotide LAR treatment arm was untreated due to administrative problems. The study was terminated because the study did not meet its primary objective so minimal efficacy data was obtained.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DoR)Once 80 PFS events had occurred
The FAS consisted of all randomized patients. Only a low number of objective responses per RECIST was expected. Therefore, protocol was amended to only list duration of response, and confirmed responses were flagged in the listing. Hence, statistical analyses were not planned and such data are not available for the following table.
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) Using Kaplan Meier MethodOnce 80 PFS events had occurred
The FAS consisted of all randomized patients.1 patient in the everolimus + pasireotide LAR treatment arm was untreated due to administrative problems. The study was terminated because the study did not meet its primary objective so minimal efficacy data was obtained.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPFS and the Predictive Probability of Success in Phase IIIOnce 105 PFS events had occurred occurred
Since the study was terminated because the study did not meet its primary objective which was based on PFS as per local radiology assessment, minimal efficacy data was obtained. Only 80 PFS events occurred before study was terminated so 105 PFS events was not reached to analyze this data.
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Radiology ReviewOnce 80 PFS events had occurred
The FAS consisted of all randomized patients.1 patient in the everolimus + pasireotide LAR treatment arm was untreated due to administrative problems. The study was terminated because the study did not meet its primary objective so minimal efficacy data was obtained.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSummary of Pharmacokinetics (PK) for Everolimus for AUClastCycle 2 Day 1PK analysis set consisted of all patients who had at least 1 pasireotide LAR injection or 1 everolimus administration and 1 evaluable concentration data.ng*hr/mLMEAN
SECONDARYSummary of Pharmacokinetics (PK) for Everolimus for CL/FCycle 2 Day 1PK analysis set consisted of all patients who had at least 1 pasireotide LAR injection or 1 everolimus administration and 1 evaluable concentration data.L/hrMEAN
SECONDARYSummary of Pharmacokinetics (PK) for Everolimus for Cmax and CminCycle 2 Day 1PK analysis set consisted of all patients who had at least 1 pasireotide LAR injection or 1 everolimus administration and 1 evaluable concentration data.ng/mLMEAN

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Local Radiological ReviewPaseriotide LAR + Everolimus16.8295% Confidence Interval 12.09 to 19.58months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Local Radiological ReviewEverolimus16.5995% Confidence Interval 11.07 to 19.48months
Safety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LARPaseriotide LAR + EverolimusDeaths7Participants
Safety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAREverolimusDeaths10Participants
Safety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LARPaseriotide LAR + EverolimusSerious Adverse Events41Participants
Safety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAREverolimusSerious Adverse Events49Participants
Safety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LARPaseriotide LAR + EverolimusAdverse Events78Participants
Safety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAREverolimusAdverse Events81Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Radiology ReviewPaseriotide LAR + Everolimus20.395% Confidence Interval 12.0 to 30.8Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Radiology ReviewEverolimus6.295% Confidence Interval 2.0 to 13.8Percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPaseriotide LAR + Everolimus79
Overall StudySTARTEDEverolimus81
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPaseriotide LAR + Everolimus78
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEverolimus81
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPaseriotide LAR + Everolimus1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEverolimus0

Adverse events432

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide2178
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus2081
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide378
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus781
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide478
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus481
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide878
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus981
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide778
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersEverolimus881

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide
Total, all-cause mortalityEverolimus
Total, other adverse eventsEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide7778
Total, other adverse eventsEverolimus8081
Total, serious adverse eventsEverolimus LAR + Pasireotide4178
Total, serious adverse eventsEverolimus4981

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Everolimus LAR + Pasireotide vs Everolimus: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01374451

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01374451/results?page=2