ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01377987

Predicting Successful Sleep Apnea Treatment With Acetazolamide in Heart Failure Patients

NCT01377987, Not applicable, Completed, David Andrew Wellman; results first posted 2018-06-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Predicting Successful Sleep Apnea Treatment With Acetazolamide in Heart Failure Patients. Trials, record NCT01377987. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01377987

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Predicting Successful Sleep Apnea Treatment With Acetazolamide in Heart Failure Patients
NCT number
NCT01377987
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
29 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
David Andrew Wellman
Conditions
Heart Failures
Interventions
Acetazolamide, Placebo
First posted
2011-06-22
Last updated
2018-06-13
Results first posted
2018-06-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing (Apnea-hypopnea Index, AHI)1 week
The frequency of apneas and hypopneas (apnea-hypopnea index) was assessed. The primary measure was the value for non-REM supine sleep. A higher value indicates more severe sleep apnea. A value above 15 indicates the presence of moderate-to-severe sleep apnea.
SecondaryVentilatory Chemoreflex Sensitivity, "Loop Gain" Using Carbon Dioxide Pulses1 week
Chemoreflex "loop gain" was assessed according to Sands SA et al AJRCCM 2017 Jan 15;195(2):237-246. Loop gain is a unitless ratio measure that describes the magnitude of the increase in ventilation that occurs in response to a prior reduction in ventilation ("disturbance") and has units of L/min per L/min. A larger value indicates a more sensitive and unstable control system predisposing to oscillatory breathing. Loop gain was measured on the time scale of 1 min (i.e. response to a 1 cycle/min sinusoidal disturbance, referred to as "LG1"). The procedure involved brief administration of 7% carbon dioxide in air for 0.5 min ("pulses"); tests were repeated every 3 min for 30 min while measuring ventilation and carbon dioxide levels at the nose with patients awake and supine. measured using 0.5 min pulses of carbon dioxide.
SecondarySympathetic Activity (Urinary Norepinephrine)1 weekUrinary norepinephrine levels overnight
SecondaryLeft-atrial Volume1 week
Left-atrial volume index, echocardiography, bi-plane method. Lower values were considered a favorable outcome. We considered values ≤28 mL/m\^2 to indicate normal left atrial volume. Values indicating graded left atrial enlargement were described as follows: mild (29-33 mL/m\^2), moderate (34-39 mL/m\^2), severe (≥40 mL/m\^2).
SecondaryBrain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)1 weekBrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in morning
SecondaryPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index1 week
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a measure of self-reported sleep quality containing 19 questions that make up 7 component scores that are added to provide a total score. Total scores range from 0-21 (units on a scale) with higher scores representing reduced sleep quality. A score of 5 or more is interpreted as reduced sleep quality. The total score is reported.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing (Apnea-hypopnea Index, AHI)1 weekAll participants who were randomized and completed the relevant study arm. Data are for non-REM supine sleep.events per hourMEAN
SECONDARYVentilatory Chemoreflex Sensitivity, Loop Gain Using Carbon Dioxide Pulses1 weekAll participants who completed the relevant arm. Morning data are reported.unitlessMEAN
SECONDARYSympathetic Activity (Urinary Norepinephrine)1 weekAll participants who completed the relevant study armug/g-creatinineMEAN
SECONDARYLeft-atrial Volume1 weekechocardiography could not be performed on one study due to rescheduling issuesmL/m^2MEAN
SECONDARYBrain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)1 weekAll participants who completed the relevant armpg/mlMEAN
SECONDARYPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index1 weekAll participants who participated in the relevant study arm.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing (Apnea-hypopnea Index, AHI)AcetazolamideAll participants26.3Standard Deviation 22.7events per hour
The Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing (Apnea-hypopnea Index, AHI)PlaceboAll participants36.1Standard Deviation 27.8events per hour
The Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing (Apnea-hypopnea Index, AHI)AcetazolamidePatients with sleep apnea32.3Standard Deviation 22.1events per hour
The Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing (Apnea-hypopnea Index, AHI)PlaceboPatients with sleep apnea44.6Standard Deviation 25.3events per hour
Ventilatory Chemoreflex Sensitivity, Loop Gain Using Carbon Dioxide PulsesAcetazolamide0.40Standard Deviation 0.16unitless
Ventilatory Chemoreflex Sensitivity, Loop Gain Using Carbon Dioxide PulsesPlacebo0.49Standard Deviation 0.14unitless
Sympathetic Activity (Urinary Norepinephrine)Acetazolamide40.8Standard Deviation 23.6ug/g-creatinine
Sympathetic Activity (Urinary Norepinephrine)Placebo35.0Standard Deviation 17.3ug/g-creatinine
Left-atrial VolumeAcetazolamide34.3Standard Deviation 12.1mL/m^2
Left-atrial VolumePlacebo40.0Standard Deviation 13.5mL/m^2

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First Intervention (7 Days)STARTEDAcetazolamide First, Then Placebo14
First Intervention (7 Days)STARTEDPlacebo First, Then Acetazolamide15
First Intervention (7 Days)COMPLETEDAcetazolamide First, Then Placebo14
First Intervention (7 Days)COMPLETEDPlacebo First, Then Acetazolamide15
First Intervention (7 Days)NOT COMPLETEDAcetazolamide First, Then Placebo0
First Intervention (7 Days)NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo First, Then Acetazolamide0
Washout (7 Days)STARTEDAcetazolamide First, Then Placebo14
Washout (7 Days)STARTEDPlacebo First, Then Acetazolamide15
Washout (7 Days)COMPLETEDAcetazolamide First, Then Placebo13
Washout (7 Days)COMPLETEDPlacebo First, Then Acetazolamide14

Adverse events20

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFall without injuryGeneral disordersAcetazolamide1281
otherFall without injuryGeneral disordersPlacebo0280
otherNocturiaRenal and urinary disordersAcetazolamide122812
otherNocturiaRenal and urinary disordersPlacebo1281
otherTaste DisturbanceMetabolism and nutrition disordersAcetazolamide4284
otherTaste DisturbanceMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo0280
otherParesthesiasNervous system disordersAcetazolamide5285
otherParesthesiasNervous system disordersPlacebo0280
otherFatigueGeneral disordersAcetazolamide3283
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo1281

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAcetazolamide028
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo028
Total, other adverse eventsAcetazolamide1728
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo628
Total, serious adverse eventsAcetazolamide028
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo028

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Acetazolamide vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Acetazolamide vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01377987

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01377987/registered