ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01382225

Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18% for Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome

NCT01382225, Phase 3, Completed, Alcon Research; results first posted 2013-07-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18% for Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome. Trials, record NCT01382225. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01382225

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18% for Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome
NCT number
NCT01382225
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,936 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Conditions
Dry Eye Syndrome
Interventions
Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18%, Vehicle
First posted
2011-06-27
Last updated
2013-07-08
Results first posted
2013-07-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Baseline, Day 7
The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated staining in three areas (cornea, nasal, and temporal conjunctiva). Staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=0% to 4=\>45%). The LGS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Baseline, Day 7
The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the frequency of five common dry eye symptoms. Frequency was rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 (0=never to 3=constantly). The GSF Total Score (0-15) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Baseline, Day 14
The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated staining in three areas (cornea, nasal, and temporal conjunctiva). Staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=0% to 4=\>45%). The LGS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14Baseline, Day 14
The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the frequency of five common dry eye symptoms. Frequency was rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 (0=never to 3=constantly). The GSF Total Score (0-15) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14
The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated corneal staining by type, extent/surface area, and depth. Each staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=no staining/0% to 4=patch/\>45%/immediate diffuse stromal glow). The CFS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14
The investigator placed a paper strip on the eye under the lower lid and left it in place for 5 minutes. The Schirmer I Score was the length of the strip wetted by the tears (0-35 millimeters). A more positive percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14
The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the intensity of five common dry eye symptoms. Intensity was rated on a visual analog scale from 0-100 (0=no symptoms to 100=severe symptoms). The GSI Total Score (0 to 500) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14
For each of 5 common dry eye symptoms, the frequency (0-3) and intensity (0-100) scores were multiplied to obtain the symptom score (0-300). The 5 symptom scores were summed to obtain the Global Symptom Composite Index Score (0-1500). A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
SecondaryProportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) RatingBaseline, Up to Day 14
The subject was asked on a questionnaire, "Please consider how your dry eyes feel when doing daily activities such as working on the computer, watching television, reading, and driving. Based on this, please rate the impact of your dry eye symptoms on your daily life," and responded on a 4-point scale from 0-3 (0=Absent to 3=Severe). Improved was defined as a change in score of \<0 from baseline. Proportion is reported as a percentage of participants. A greater percentage of subjects reporting a lower score indicates an improvement.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Baseline, Day 7
Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT): The set of all randomized subjects who received at least one administration of the allocated product, had baseline efficacy measurement, had at least 1 post-baseline measurement and received the correct formulation of the lissamine green solution.
Units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Baseline, Day 7Modified Intent-to-TreatUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Baseline, Day 14Modified Intent-to-TreatUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14Baseline, Day 14Modified Intent-to-TreatUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14Modified Intent-to-TreatPercent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14Modified Intent-to-TreatPercent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14Modified Intent-to-TreatPercent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14Modified Intent-to-TreatPercentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) RatingBaseline, Up to Day 14Modified Intent-to-TreatPercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group44

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Sodium HyaluronateBaseline4.9Standard Deviation 2.2Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7VehicleBaseline4.8Standard Deviation 2.1Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Sodium HyaluronateChange from Baseline at Day 7-0.8Standard Deviation 1.8Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7VehicleChange from Baseline at Day 7-0.7Standard Deviation 1.6Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Sodium HyaluronateBaseline8.9Standard Deviation 2.3Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7VehicleBaseline9.1Standard Deviation 2.3Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Sodium HyaluronateChange from Baseline at Day 7-1.6Standard Deviation 2.6Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7VehicleChange from Baseline at Day 7-1.3Standard Deviation 2.4Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Sodium HyaluronateBaseline4.9Standard Deviation 2.2Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14VehicleBaseline4.8Standard Deviation 2.1Units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSodium Hyaluronate725
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle729
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSodium Hyaluronate711
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle722
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSodium Hyaluronate14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVehicle7

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousGastritisGastrointestinal disordersSodium Hyaluronate1723
seriousGastritisGastrointestinal disordersVehicle0727
seriousHyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersSodium Hyaluronate0723
seriousHyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersVehicle1727
seriousManiaPsychiatric disordersSodium Hyaluronate0723
seriousManiaPsychiatric disordersVehicle1727

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Hyaluronate
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Hyaluronate0723
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle0727
Total, serious adverse eventsSodium Hyaluronate1723
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle1727

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Sodium Hyaluronate vs Vehicle: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01382225

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01382225/results?page=2