ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01387074

Observational Study of Botox® Treatment for Patients With Upper Limb Adult Spasticity

NCT01387074, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2014-02-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Observational Study of Botox® Treatment for Patients With Upper Limb Adult Spasticity. Trials, record NCT01387074. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01387074

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Observational Study of Botox® Treatment for Patients With Upper Limb Adult Spasticity
NCT number
NCT01387074
Status
Completed
Enrollment
108 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Muscle Spasticity
Interventions
botulinum toxin Type A
First posted
2011-07-04
Last updated
2014-02-03
Results first posted
2014-02-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBaseline
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the elbow compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Week 24Week 24
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the elbow compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Wrist at BaselineBaseline
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the wrist compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Wrist at Week 24Week 24
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the wrist compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Fingers at BaselineBaseline
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the fingers compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Fingers at Week 24Week 24
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the fingers compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Thumb at BaselineBaseline
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the thumb compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.
PrimaryMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Thumb at Week 24Week 24
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the thumb compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension. A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best). A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse). The number of participants in each score category is presented.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBaselineEfficacy population included all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Week 24Week 24Participants from the Efficacy population (all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin) who had data available for this outcome measure.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Wrist at BaselineBaselineEfficacy population included all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Wrist at Week 24Week 24Participants from the Efficacy population (all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin) who had data available for this outcome measure.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Fingers at BaselineBaselineEfficacy population included all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Fingers at Week 24Week 24Participants from the Efficacy population (all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin) who had data available for this outcome measure.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Thumb at BaselineBaselineEfficacy population included all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMuscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Thumb at Week 24Week 24Participants from the Efficacy population (all participants who received BOTOX® not previously treated with botulinum toxin) who had data available for this outcome measure.ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBotulinum Toxin Type A0=No Increase2Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBotulinum Toxin Type A1=Slight Increase6Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBotulinum Toxin Type A1+=Slight Increase18Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBotulinum Toxin Type A2=Marked Increase39Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBotulinum Toxin Type A3=Considerable Increase30Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at BaselineBotulinum Toxin Type A4=Affected part rigid6Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Week 24Botulinum Toxin Type A0=No Increase2Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Week 24Botulinum Toxin Type A1=Slight Increase26Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Week 24Botulinum Toxin Type A1+=Slight Increase43Participants
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Week 24Botulinum Toxin Type A2=Marked Increase12Participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBotulinum Toxin Type A108
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBotulinum Toxin Type A100
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBotulinum Toxin Type A8

Adverse events11

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousStatus epilepticusNervous system disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousBacteraemiaInfections and infestationsBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousPneumonia aspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousGastroenteritis norovirusGastrointestinal disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousClostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestationsBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousHypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousType 2 diabetes mellitusEndocrine disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousHypoglycaemiaEndocrine disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousCandiduriaRenal and urinary disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108
seriousDehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disordersBotulinum Toxin Type A1108

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBotulinum Toxin Type A
Total, other adverse eventsBotulinum Toxin Type A0108
Total, serious adverse eventsBotulinum Toxin Type A1108

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01387074

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01387074/results?page=2