ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01399372

Rituximab, Methotrexate, Vincristine Sulfate, Procarbazine Hydrochloride, and Cytarabine With or Without Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

NCT01399372, Phase 2, Completed, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; results first posted 2021-05-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Rituximab, Methotrexate, Vincristine Sulfate, Procarbazine Hydrochloride, and Cytarabine With or Without Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma. Trials, record NCT01399372. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01399372

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Rituximab, Methotrexate, Vincristine Sulfate, Procarbazine Hydrochloride, and Cytarabine With or Without Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT01399372
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
91 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Conditions
Chemotherapeutic Agent Toxicity, Cognitive/Functional Effects, Lymphoma, Neurotoxicity, Radiation Toxicity
Interventions
Rituximab, Cytarabine, Methotrexate, Procarbazine, Vincristine, low-dose whole-brain radiation therapy
First posted
2011-07-21
Last updated
2023-07-20
Results first posted
2021-05-13
Limitations and caveats
A planned interim efficacy analysis was performed after 42 events (death or progression). The final analysis was planned to occur after 67 events. The Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) recommended releasing the interim results for early reporting and these results are considered the final study results.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free SurvivalFrom randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.
Progression is defined as any of the following: more than 25% increase in the contrast-enhancing lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with baseline or best response; new site of disease (central nervous system or systemic); recurrent or new ocular disease; recurrent or positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Progression-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). Progression-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalFrom randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Experiencing Partial Response or Complete ResponseAfter 4th cycle of chemotherapy, approximately 4 months after randomization.
Response was evaluated using the international criteria proposed by the International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) Study Group criteria. Complete Response was defined as no contrast brain enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no corticosteroid use for at least 2 weeks, a normal eye exam, and negative CSF cytology. Partial response was defined as at least 50% decrease in enhancing tumor on MRI compared with baseline imaging, no or minor retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) abnormality, and negative CSF cytology.
SecondaryGlobal Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)EORTC QLQ-C30 was administered at baseline, after cycle 4 of treatment (4 months), then every six months after end of treatment (7 months) for five years.
Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the EORTC QLQ-C30. The question responses range from 1 "very poor" to 7 "excellent" such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Data through five years after end of protocol treatment is included in the analysis, while summary data is provided only through three years due to very few participants after that timepoint.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Neurocognitive Failure
Neurocognitive function tests were administered at baseline, after cycle 4 of treatment (4 months), then every six months after end of treatment (7 months) for five years. Two-year rates are provided here.
Neurocognitive failure is defined as cognitive failure on two or more of the following tests: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) Free Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recognition, Trail Making Test Part A, Trail Making Test Part B, and Controlled Oral Word Association. Cognitive failure for each test is defined as a change from baseline in raw score (post baseline score - baseline score) at or exceeding the minimally important difference reported in the literature \[determined by the reliable change index (RCI) method\] of -5, -3, -2,12, 26, and -12, respectively, indicating a worsening of neurocognitive function. Time to neurocognitive failure is defined as time from randomization to date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method and the distributions of failure times are compared between the arms. Two-year estimates are provided here.
SecondaryDistribution of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Related to Protocol Treatment
At the end of each chemotherapy 28-day cycle, then every 2 months for two years starting 4 weeks after treatment, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Adverse events reported as definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatment are considered to be related to treatment.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free SurvivalFrom randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.Eligible participantsyearsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalFrom randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.Eligible participantsyearsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Experiencing Partial Response or Complete ResponseAfter 4th cycle of chemotherapy, approximately 4 months after randomization.Eligible participants with Cycle 4 disease assessment datapercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGlobal Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)EORTC QLQ-C30 was administered at baseline, after cycle 4 of treatment (4 months), then every six months after end of treatment (7 months) for five years.Eligible, consented to quality of life study component, and has GHS score for at least one timepoint.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Neurocognitive Failure
Neurocognitive function tests were administered at baseline, after cycle 4 of treatment (4 months), then every six months after end of treatment (7 months) for five years. Two-year rates are provided here.
Eligible, consented to neurocognitive function study component and has at least two completed neurocognitive tests at baseline and at least one post baseline visit.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDistribution of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Related to Protocol Treatment
At the end of each chemotherapy 28-day cycle, then every 2 months for two years starting 4 weeks after treatment, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.3 years.
Eligible participants who started protocol treatmentParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group44

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free SurvivalChemotherapy2.195% Confidence Interval 1.0 to NAyears
Progression-free SurvivalChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRTNA95% Confidence Interval 3.3 to NAyears
Overall SurvivalChemotherapyNA95% Confidence Interval 2.6 to NAyears
Overall SurvivalChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRTNA95% Confidence Interval 4.5 to NAyears
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Partial Response or Complete ResponseChemotherapy83.395% Confidence Interval 65.3 to 94.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Partial Response or Complete ResponseChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT80.695% Confidence Interval 62.5 to 92.5percentage of participants
Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)ChemotherapyBaseline62.78Standard Deviation 23.54score on a scale
Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRTBaseline54.90Standard Deviation 26.91score on a scale
Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)ChemotherapyEnd of cycle 467.67Standard Deviation 23.97score on a scale
Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRTEnd of cycle 464.58Standard Deviation 20.49score on a scale

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDChemotherapy47
Overall StudySTARTEDChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT44
Overall StudyEligibleChemotherapy44
Overall StudyEligibleChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT43
Overall StudyEligible and Started Protocol TreatmentChemotherapy43
Overall StudyEligible and Started Protocol TreatmentChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT43
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDChemotherapy44
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT43
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDChemotherapy3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT1

Adverse events352

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy3443
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT3043
otherBlood and lymphatic system disorders - OtherBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy343
otherBlood and lymphatic system disorders - OtherBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT343
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy043
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT343
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersChemotherapy343
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT243
otherHearing impairedEar and labyrinth disordersChemotherapy143
otherHearing impairedEar and labyrinth disordersChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT443

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityChemotherapy344
Total, all-cause mortalityChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT143
Total, other adverse eventsChemotherapy4243
Total, other adverse eventsChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT4343
Total, serious adverse eventsChemotherapy2243
Total, serious adverse eventsChemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT2143

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy + Low-Dose WBRT: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests4

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal LearningSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01399372

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01399372/results?page=2