ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01410448

Everolimus in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

NCT01410448, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2017-06-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Everolimus in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients. Trials, record NCT01410448. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01410448

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Everolimus in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT number
NCT01410448
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
383 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Kidney Transplantation
Interventions
Everolimus, Mycophenolate sodium, Cyclosporine, Steroids
First posted
2011-08-05
Last updated
2017-06-16
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-002866-19
Results first posted
2017-06-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case Scenario3 months
The percentage of participants without wound healing complications was assessed. Wound healing complications consisted of lymphorrhea, fluid collections, wound dehiscence, wound infections and incisional hernia. In the worst-case scenario, failure, i.e. at least one healing complication occurrence, was identified in one of the following cases: wound complication occurrence, missing information about wound complication occurrence, or study discontinuation due to any reason.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case Scenario12 months
The percentage of participants without wound healing complications was assessed. Wound healing complications consisted of lymphorrhea, fluid collections, wound dehiscence, wound infections and incisional hernia. In the worst-case scenario, failure, i.e. at least one healing complication occurrence, was identified in one of the following cases: wound complication occurrence, missing information about wound complication occurrence or study discontinuation due to any reason for participants who did not complete the 12 month follow-up visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment Failure - Worst-case Scenario3 months
The percentage of participants who experienced treatment failure was assessed. Treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of at least one failure event among death, graft loss or biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). In the worst-case scenario, treatment failure was identified in one of the following cases: occurrence of at least one treatment failure event or study discontinuation due to any reason.
SecondaryPatient Survival Rate: Percentage of Deaths - Worst-case Scenario3 Months, 12 monthsThe percentage of deaths was assessed. In the worst-case scenario, failure, i.e. death, was identified in one of the following cases: participant's death or study discontinuation due to any reason.
SecondaryParticipant/Graft Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants With Failure Events of Death or Graft Loss - Worst-case Scenario3 months
The percentage of participants who experienced death or graft loss was assessed. In the worst-case scenario, failure, i.e. participants death or graft loss, was identified in one of the following cases: occurrence of at least one failure event or study discontinuation due to any reason.
SecondaryGraft Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss - Worst-case Scenario3 months, 12 months
The percentage of participants who experienced graft loss was assessed. In the worst-case scenario, failure, i.e. graft loss, was identified in one of the following cases: occurrence of graft loss or discontinuation due to any reason.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With BPAR - Worst-case Scenario3 Months, 12 months
A biopsy-proven acute rejection was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III. In the worst-case scenario, failure, i.e. BPAR, was identified in one of the following cases: occurrence of BPAR or study discontinuation due to any reason.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Delayed Graft Function (DGF) -3 MonthsDGF was defined as the need for dialysis in the first week after transplant, excluding Renal Replacement Therapy within the first 24 hours after transplantation.
SecondaryDuration of DGF3 monthsThe duration of DGF was defined as the elapsed time from first to last day of post-transplant dialysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (Calculated With Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-4 Formula - ITTbaseline, 3 Months
Renal function was assessed by measuring serum creatinine and serum urea and by calculating creatinine clearance using the MDRD-4 formula. eGFR = 186.3\*(serum creatinine \[mg/dL\])\^-1.154 \* (age at screening) -0.203 \* (0.742 if female) \* (1.21 if African American). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case Scenario3 monthsThe safety population, which included all randomized participants who were treated and had at least one safety assessment, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case Scenario12 monthsThe safety population, which included all randomized participants who were treated and had at least one safety assessment, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment Failure - Worst-case Scenario3 monthsThe intent to treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants who were treated, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPatient Survival Rate: Percentage of Deaths - Worst-case Scenario3 Months, 12 monthsThe intent to treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants who were treated, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYParticipant/Graft Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants With Failure Events of Death or Graft Loss - Worst-case Scenario3 monthsThe intent to treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants who were treated, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGraft Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss - Worst-case Scenario3 months, 12 monthsThe intent to treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants who were treated, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With BPAR - Worst-case Scenario3 Months, 12 monthsThe intent to treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants who were treated, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Delayed Graft Function (DGF) -3 MonthsThe intent to treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants who were treated, was analyzed.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of DGF3 months
Participants from the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) populations who required dialysis, 46 (23.83%) of the IE group and 60 (31.58%) of the DE group, were analyzed. The ITT population included all randomized participants who were treated.
DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (Calculated With Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-4 Formula - ITTbaseline, 3 Months
Participants from the ITT, who had both baseline and month 3 measurements, were included in the analysis for the month 3 time point. The ITT population included all randomized participants who were treated.
mL/minMEAN

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case ScenarioImmediate Everolimus (IE)68.39Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case ScenarioDelayed Everolimus (DE)61.58Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case ScenarioImmediate Everolimus (IE)65.80Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Without Wound Healing Complications - Worst-case ScenarioDelayed Everolimus (DE)59.47Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment Failure - Worst-case ScenarioImmediate Everolimus (IE)11.40Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment Failure - Worst-case ScenarioDelayed Everolimus (DE)21.05Percentage of participants
Patient Survival Rate: Percentage of Deaths - Worst-case ScenarioImmediate Everolimus (IE)6.22Percentage of participants
Patient Survival Rate: Percentage of Deaths - Worst-case ScenarioDelayed Everolimus (DE)18.42Percentage of participants
Participant/Graft Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants With Failure Events of Death or Graft Loss - Worst-case ScenarioImmediate Everolimus (IE)6.74Percentage of participants
Participant/Graft Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants With Failure Events of Death or Graft Loss - Worst-case ScenarioDelayed Everolimus (DE)18.42Percentage of participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDImmediate Everolimus (IE)193
Overall StudySTARTEDDelayed Everolimus (DE)190
Overall StudyIntent-to Treat (ITT) Analysis SetImmediate Everolimus (IE)193
Overall StudyIntent-to Treat (ITT) Analysis SetDelayed Everolimus (DE)190
Overall StudyModified ITT Analysis SetImmediate Everolimus (IE)161
Overall StudyModified ITT Analysis SetDelayed Everolimus (DE)149
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImmediate Everolimus (IE)181
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDelayed Everolimus (DE)155
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImmediate Everolimus (IE)12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDelayed Everolimus (DE)35

Adverse events278

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImmediate Everolimus (IE)67193
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDelayed Everolimus (DE)58190
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImmediate Everolimus (IE)8193
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDelayed Everolimus (DE)14190
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersImmediate Everolimus (IE)14193
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersDelayed Everolimus (DE)15190
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersImmediate Everolimus (IE)12193
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersDelayed Everolimus (DE)13190
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersImmediate Everolimus (IE)4193
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersDelayed Everolimus (DE)14190

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityImmediate Everolimus (IE)
Total, all-cause mortalityDelayed Everolimus (DE)
Total, other adverse eventsImmediate Everolimus (IE)155193
Total, other adverse eventsDelayed Everolimus (DE)156190
Total, serious adverse eventsImmediate Everolimus (IE)73193
Total, serious adverse eventsDelayed Everolimus (DE)61190

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Immediate Everolimus (IE) vs Delayed Everolimus (DE): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01410448

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01410448/results?page=2