ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01424670

Safety and Efficacy Trial of Delamanid for 6 Months in Participants With Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis

NCT01424670, Phase 3, Completed, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.; results first posted 2019-05-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy Trial of Delamanid for 6 Months in Participants With Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. Trials, record NCT01424670. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01424670

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy Trial of Delamanid for 6 Months in Participants With Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis
NCT number
NCT01424670
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
511 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Conditions
Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis
Interventions
Delamanid + OBR, Placebo + OBR
First posted
2011-08-29
Last updated
2019-05-15
Results first posted
2019-05-15
Limitations and caveats
The primary endpoint was established at 6 months. Treatment, intensive data collection, and statistical power calculations focused on the first 6 months. Given the unexpected placebo + OBR response, cautiously interpret 18, 24, and 30 month outcomes.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTime To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) SystemMonth 6
SCC at 6 months was determined by the observation of a sputum specimen negative for growth of mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) using the MGIT culture system, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative sputum culture at least 25 days after the first negative and not followed by a confirmed positive (defined as at least 2 observed positive results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results). 2 specimens were collected at each visit and an algorithm in the statistical analysis plan (SAP) was used to define a single representative result. Time to SCC was then defined as the interval between the date of first dose of IMP and the date of first of 2 consecutive negative single representative time points that were at least 25 days apart. The median time in days to SCC up to Month 6 is presented.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITMonth 2 and Month 6
SCC was evaluated at 2 and 6 months (6-month Intensive Period) using MGIT. SCC at 2 months was defined to occur at the date of collection of the first sputum specimen with mycobacterial culture negative for growth of MTB using MGIT culture, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative MGIT culture result at least 25 days after the first negative specimen and not followed by any sputum specimens positive for growth in the MGIT culture at any point up to 3 months (Week 12). SCC at 6 months was determined by the observation of a sputum specimen negative for growth of MTB using the MGIT culture system, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative sputum culture at least 25 days after the first negative and not followed by a confirmed positive (defined as at least 2 observed positive results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results). 2 specimens were collected at each visit and an algorithm in the SAP was used to define a single representative result.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITMonth 18, Month 24, and Month 30
Sustained SCC was defined as SCC achieved by Month 6 and not followed by a confirmed positive thereafter, where confirmed positive was defined as 2 or more observed positive single representative culture results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results. Sustained SCC was analyzed at Month 18 to 30 using MGIT.
SecondaryTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRMonth 24
Final treatment outcomes were assessed by the Principal Investigator (PI) at the end of treatment with OBR (24 months post randomization) according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) outcome definitions for treating participants with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). Frequency counts and percentage of participants achieving favorable and unfavorable outcomes were provided by treatment group. Participants who had non-missing Principal Investigator assessed treatment outcomes at the end of treatment with OBR were included in the analysis.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Developed Resistance To DelamanidUp to Month 30Acquired resistance was defined as a post-baseline resistant result at any time point after a Baseline susceptible result. The overall resistance to delamanid during the trial was assessed.
SecondaryMean (Time Averaged) Area Under The Curve (AUC) Of Change From Baseline In Time To Detection (TTD) To Month 6 Using MGITBaseline, up to Month 6
The value for TTD was defined (in days) as the time interval from inoculation until a MGIT machine detects a positive signal for a sputum culture. The AUC of the change from Baseline for TTD in days (from Baseline to Month 6) summarizes the overall participant response for the treatment period. The change from Baseline in original time to detection of MGIT positive signal, in days, up to 6 months was performed using AUC in MGIT. The Baseline was defined as the average of Day -1 and Day 1 values if cultures on both days were positive; if only 1 culture was positive, the value for TTD for the positive culture was used as the Baseline. The TTD is Time to Detection measured by day, so the unit of AUC of change from baseline in TTD is day\*day. Since "Mean AUC" is reported, which is actually "Time Averaged AUC," the AUC was divided by the duration of the observation, and thus the unit of the Mean AUC is day.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 24, Week 26, and Last visit (Month 18 or last visit for participants treated beyond Month 18)
The value for TTD was defined (in days) as the time interval from inoculation until a MGIT machine detects a positive signal for a sputum culture during the routine 42-day incubation period. TTD analysis was based only on the corresponding qualitative sputum results of pure positive and pure negative cultures in days and hours of the initial positive signal for a culture from the MGIT printout. Mean change is reported for Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 24, Week 26, and Last visit (Month 18 or last visit for participants treated beyond Month 18).
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGITMonth 30
Treatment success was defined as achieving SCC by 6 months using MGIT, completing the trial out to 30 months with sustained SCC and alive at the last contact for follow-up. All other participants were treatment failures who failed to achieve SCC by Month 6, achieved SCC but have a confirmed positive, early terminate from the trial prior to the Month 30 visit but are alive at the last contact for follow-up, lost to follow-up and vital status unknown and death.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTime To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) SystemMonth 6
The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.
DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITMonth 2 and Month 6
The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITMonth 18, Month 24, and Month 30
The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRMonth 24
The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Developed Resistance To DelamanidUp to Month 30The intent-to-treat (ITT) sample comprised all randomized participants.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean (Time Averaged) Area Under The Curve (AUC) Of Change From Baseline In Time To Detection (TTD) To Month 6 Using MGITBaseline, up to Month 6
The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both, who had both a baseline and at least one post baseline TTD value.
daysMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 24, Week 26, and Last visit (Month 18 or last visit for participants treated beyond Month 18)
The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.
daysMEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGITMonth 30
The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group52

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Time To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) SystemDelamanid + OBR5195% Confidence Interval 43 to 57Days
Time To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) SystemPlacebo + OBR5795% Confidence Interval 56 to 64Days
Proportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITDelamanid + OBRAt Month 2132Participants
Proportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITPlacebo + OBRAt Month 254Participants
Proportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITDelamanid + OBRAt Month 6198Participants
Proportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITPlacebo + OBRAt Month 687Participants
Proportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITDelamanid + OBRAt 18 months180Participants
Proportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITPlacebo + OBRAt 18 months83Participants
Proportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITDelamanid + OBRAt 24 months178Participants
Proportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITPlacebo + OBRAt 24 months82Participants

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)STARTEDDelamanid + OBR341
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)STARTEDPlacebo + OBR170
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugDelamanid + OBR341
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)Received at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPlacebo + OBR170
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)COMPLETEDDelamanid + OBR322
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)COMPLETEDPlacebo + OBR156
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)NOT COMPLETEDDelamanid + OBR19
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo + OBR14
Continuation PeriodSTARTEDDelamanid + OBR322
Continuation PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo + OBR156

Adverse events380

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDelamanid + OBR17341
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo + OBR9170
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersDelamanid + OBR19341
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo + OBR12170
otherDeafness bilateralEar and labyrinth disordersDelamanid + OBR15341
otherDeafness bilateralEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo + OBR9170
otherHypoacusisEar and labyrinth disordersDelamanid + OBR15341
otherHypoacusisEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo + OBR15170
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersDelamanid + OBR71341
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo + OBR36170

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDelamanid + OBR18341
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo + OBR8170
Total, other adverse eventsDelamanid + OBR335341
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo + OBR165170
Total, serious adverse eventsDelamanid + OBR89341
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo + OBR47170

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
30630778DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Delamanid + OBR vs Placebo + OBR: Number of Participants Who Developed Resistance To DelamanidTrial comparisons
Delamanid + OBR vs Placebo + OBR: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Delamanid + OBR vs Placebo + OBR: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01424670

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01424670/results?page=2