ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01432236

A Phase 3b Multicenter Study of Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia Subjects Who Have Comorbid Depression

NCT01432236, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.; results first posted 2014-10-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Phase 3b Multicenter Study of Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia Subjects Who Have Comorbid Depression. Trials, record NCT01432236. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01432236

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Phase 3b Multicenter Study of Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia Subjects Who Have Comorbid Depression
NCT number
NCT01432236
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
197 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Interventions
Pregabalin, placebo
First posted
2011-09-12
Last updated
2021-01-22
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-002480-19
Results first posted
2014-10-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes22

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean NRS Pain Score at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
The daily pain diary consists of an 11-point numeric scale (NRS) ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants describe their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. The endpoint mean pain scores for Period 1 and Period 2 are defined as the mean of the last 7 non-missing daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in the double-blind phase during Period 1 and Period 2, respectively.
SecondaryFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Baseline
This was a 20-item participant reported outcome instrument. It contained 10 subscales, which were combined to yield a total score. The first 11 questions were related specifically to physical functioning subscale, ranging from 0 to 10. The remaining 9 questions assessed pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 10. The higher values indicated greater impairment. All 20 were combined to form a total score ranging from 0 to 100, provides an estimation of fibromyalgia impact with higher scores indicating more impairment. The severity categorizations for the FIQ are: less than 40 (mild), 40-60 (moderate), and above 60 (severe).
SecondaryFIQ Score at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
This was a 20-item participant reported outcome instrument. It contained 10 subscales, which were combined to yield a total score. The first 11 questions were related specifically to physical functioning subscale, ranging from 0 to 10. The remaining 9 questions assessed pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 10. The higher values indicated greater impairment. All 20 were combined to form a total score ranging from 0 to 100, provides an estimation of fibromyalgia impact with higher scores indicating more impairment. The severity categorizations for the FIQ are: less than 40 (mild), 40-60 (moderate), and above 60 (severe).
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Period 1.End of Period 1 at Week 6PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Pain Reduction Based on Daily Pain Diary.Visits 2, 6, and 12
Participant with at least a 30% reduction in mean pain score from baseline (at randomization) to the endpoint at the end of each period (Visits 6 and 12) is considered a 30% responder, for the respective period. Similarly, a subject with at least a 50% reduction in mean pain score from baseline (at randomization) to the endpoint at the end of each period (Visits 6 and 12) is considered a 50% responder, for the respective period.
SecondarySubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Sleep Quality at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included 5 items: participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Subjective rating of quality of sleep during the past night was done by selecting a number between 0 (very poor) and 10 (excellent). Mean sleep quality was calculated as the mean of the last seven days, the potential range of responses was therefore 0-10.
SecondarySubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Wake After Sleep Onset at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective wake after sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was awake after initial sleep onset until final awakening.
SecondarySubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Latency to Sleep Onset at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective latency to sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the amount of time to fall asleep after lights out.
SecondarySubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Total Sleep Time at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective total sleep time was the subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening.
SecondarySubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Parameter Estimates for Subjective Number of Awakenings Per Night After Sleep Onset at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective number of awakenings after sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the total number of times the participant awakened during the night until final awakening.

Outcomes22

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean NRS Pain Score at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.BaselineITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYFIQ Score at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14
ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. Different number (N) for each category represents participants that were actually treated with pregabalin and placebo during the study.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Period 1.End of Period 1 at Week 6ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPGIC at the End of Period 2.End of Period 2 at Week 14ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Pain Reduction Based on Daily Pain Diary.Visits 2, 6, and 12ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Sleep Quality at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYSubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Wake After Sleep Onset at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.MinutesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYSubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Latency to Sleep Onset at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.MinutesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYSubjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Total Sleep Time at End of Period.End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation.MinutesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group160

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean NRS Pain Score at End of Period.Pregabalin4.84Standard Error 0.15Units on a scale
Mean NRS Pain Score at End of Period.Placebo5.45Standard Error 0.16Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Pregabalin/PlaceboTotal (N=96, 96)63.83Standard Deviation 11.58Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Placebo/PregabalinTotal (N=96, 96)62.75Standard Deviation 12.51Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Pregabalin/PlaceboPhysical Impairment (N=96, 97)4.58Standard Deviation 2.10Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Placebo/PregabalinPhysical Impairment (N=96, 97)4.44Standard Deviation 2.14Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Pregabalin/PlaceboFeel Good (N=96, 97)7.78Standard Deviation 2.47Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Placebo/PregabalinFeel Good (N=96, 97)7.43Standard Deviation 2.32Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Pregabalin/PlaceboWork Missed (N=96, 97)3.38Standard Deviation 2.88Units on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline.Placebo/PregabalinWork Missed (N=96, 97)3.49Standard Deviation 3.21Units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPregabalin/Placebo96
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo/Pregabalin97
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPregabalin/Placebo70
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo/Pregabalin79
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPregabalin/Placebo26
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo/Pregabalin18

Adverse events396

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutrophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPregabalin0181
otherNeutrophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1177
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPregabalin0181
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo1177
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPregabalin0181
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo1177
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPregabalin0181
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo1177
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPregabalin2181
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo0177

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPregabalin
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsPregabalin139181
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo106177
Total, serious adverse eventsPregabalin3181
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo1177

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26034150DERIVEDPubMed
27057659DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Pregabalin vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01432236

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01432236/registered?page=2