ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01445678

Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

NCT01445678, Phase 3, Completed, Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA); results first posted 2015-01-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections. Trials, record NCT01445678. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01445678

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections
NCT number
NCT01445678
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
494 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Conditions
Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
Interventions
CXA-201 and metronidazole, Meropenem
First posted
2011-10-04
Last updated
2018-11-16
Results first posted
2015-01-15
Limitations and caveats
Two identical P3 protocols were initiated (NCT01445678 and NCT01445665) subsequently, Cubist and FDA agreed that integrated data from the 2 protocols could be analyzed and reported in a single Clinical Study Report. These analyses are presented here.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationTOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administration
Clinical cure is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects With Microbiological Outcome of Success at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationTOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administration
Success is eradication (absence of the baseline pathogen in a specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection) or presumed eradication (absence of material to culture in a subject who was assessed as a clinical cure) for each baseline pathogen
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT PopulationEOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administration
Clinical response is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy in the ME PopulationEOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administration
Clinical response is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at Long Term Follow-Up (LFU) in the MITT PopulationLFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administrationClinical response is clinical cure at TOC and no signs and symptoms recur or worsen since the TOC visit.
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at LFU Visit in the ME PopulationLFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administrationClinical response is clinical cure at TOC and no signs and symptoms recur or worsen since the TOC visit

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationTOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administrationMITT: Randomized patients, with baseline pathogen.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects With Microbiological Outcome of Success at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationTOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administrationMicrobiologically evaluable: Treated patients, complied with protocol, with pathogens susceptible to study drug.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT PopulationEOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administrationMITT: Microbiological Intent-to-Treat: Randomized patients, with baseline pathogen.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy in the ME PopulationEOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administrationMicrobiologically evaluable: Treated patients, complied with protocol, with pathogens susceptible to study drug.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at Long Term Follow-Up (LFU) in the MITT PopulationLFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administrationMITT: Randomized patients, with baseline pathogen.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at LFU Visit in the ME PopulationLFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administrationMicrobiologically evaluable: Treated patients, complied with protocol, with pathogens susceptible to study drug.percentage of subjectsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI83.0percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI87.3percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Microbiological Outcome of Success at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI94.2percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Microbiological Outcome of Success at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI94.7percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT PopulationCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI89.2percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT PopulationMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI92.3percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy in the ME PopulationCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI97.1percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy in the ME PopulationMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI97.5percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at Long Term Follow-Up (LFU) in the MITT PopulationCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI82.5percentage of subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at Long Term Follow-Up (LFU) in the MITT PopulationMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI86.6percentage of subjects

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI482
Overall StudySTARTEDMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI497
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI452
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI476
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI30
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI21

Adverse events232

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI6482
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI4497
otherThrombocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI8482
otherThrombocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI5497
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI6482
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI2497
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI7482
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI9497
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI6482
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI2497

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI
Total, all-cause mortalityMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI
Total, other adverse eventsCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI159482
Total, other adverse eventsMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI138497
Total, serious adverse eventsCXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI39482
Total, serious adverse eventsMeropenem as Treatment for cIAI36497

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25670823DERIVEDPubMed
27139477DERIVEDPubMed
27999024DERIVEDPubMed
28446129DERIVEDPubMed
28464828DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
CXA-201 and Metronidazole as Treatment for cIAI vs Meropenem as Treatment for cIAI: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01445678

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01445678/events?page=2