ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01462565

Study of a New Thermo Stable Formulation of Epoprostenol Sodium to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

NCT01462565, Phase 4, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2017-10-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of a New Thermo Stable Formulation of Epoprostenol Sodium to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH). Trials, record NCT01462565. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01462565

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of a New Thermo Stable Formulation of Epoprostenol Sodium to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)
NCT number
NCT01462565
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
16 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Hypertension, Pulmonary
Interventions
current marketed FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium), new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium
First posted
2011-10-31
Last updated
2017-10-16
Results first posted
2017-10-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3)
Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health), 2 summary scores (physical component and mental component), and a self-evaluated change in health status. Subscale and summary scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale and summary scores was considered as better health status. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance SurveyBaseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3).
Study-specific questionnaire comprised the pre-defined15 questions which included activities of daily living assessment. Participants rated the question on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 was do not agree and 10 was strongly agree. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Changes from Baseline was assessed for Questions 2 to 12. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Dose of Thermo Stable Epoprostenol Sodium at Week 4Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4
Dose titration requirement was assessed at the time of discharge. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Units- nanogram per kilogram per minute (ng/kg/min). Baseline was Visit 2 i.e . Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)Up to visit 3 (Week 4)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect and medically significant and all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia. Only treatment emergent AEs and SAEs were reported in this outcome measure. Specifically, this study reported 2 SAEs, but only 1 was categorized as treatment emergent.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment PeriodBaseline visit (Visit 2) to Week 4 (Visit 3)Infusion site reactions were reported during the treatment period. Infusion site was inspected for erythema, excoriation, induration, skin necrosis or signs of local sepsis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4 : Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4(Visit 3)
Systolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is relaxed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4: Heart RateBaseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4
Summary mean change in heart rate measured in beats per minute (beats/min or BPM). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical ChemistryUp to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)
Abnormal clinical chemistry was analyzed as follows: serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) \>= 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) , aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) \>= 3 x ULN , total bilirubin \>= 34.2, creatinine \>= 176.8.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal HematologyUp to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)
Values for hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count were analyzed. Participants with abnormal values have been reported. The low and high value concern were as follows: hemoglobin (Males \< 98, \>180.0) (females \<91, \>161.0)grams per litre (g/L); hematocrit (Males \< 32.0, \>54.0) (females \<29.0, \>50.6) fraction (1); platelet count (\< 100, \> 500) gram international units per litre (gI/L).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal UrinalysisUp to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)Dipstick method was used to measure blood, glucose and protein. Data was analyzed up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up visit).

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3)
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of epoprostenol sodium during the Run-in period (either currently marketed epoprostenol sodium or the study drug).
Score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance SurveyBaseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3).ITT population.Score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Dose of Thermo Stable Epoprostenol Sodium at Week 4Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4ITT population.ng/kg/minMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)Up to visit 3 (Week 4)ITT population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment PeriodBaseline visit (Visit 2) to Week 4 (Visit 3)ITT population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4 : Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4(Visit 3)ITT population.Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4: Heart RateBaseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4ITT population.beats/minMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical ChemistryUp to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)ITT population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormal HematologyUp to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)ITT population. Only those participant available at the indicated time points were analyzed.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormal UrinalysisUp to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)ITT population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group55

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionPhysical Functioning-1.156Standard Deviation 3.6593Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionRole-Physical-0.765Standard Deviation 6.3050Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionRole-Emotional0.002Standard Deviation 11.1773Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionVitality0.781Standard Deviation 7.1636Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionMental Health0.883Standard Deviation 7.6063Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionSocial Functioning1.706Standard Deviation 7.1043Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionBodily Pain3.065Standard Deviation 5.8291Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionGeneral Health-0.606Standard Deviation 5.6068Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionPhysical Health Component-0.123Standard Deviation 4.2876Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)Epoprostenol Sodium for InjectionMental Health Component1.141Standard Deviation 6.5078Score on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection16
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection0

Adverse events19

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAscitesGastrointestinal disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection116
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection216
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection216
otherParaesthesia oralGastrointestinal disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection116
otherFatigueGeneral disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection216
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection116
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection116
otherMuscle tightnessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection116
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection116
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection116

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection016
Total, other adverse eventsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection916
Total, serious adverse eventsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection216

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25793960DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01462565

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01462565/results?page=2