ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01466348

Effects of a Common Cold Treatment on Cognitive Function

NCT01466348, Phase 4, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2013-11-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effects of a Common Cold Treatment on Cognitive Function. Trials, record NCT01466348. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01466348

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effects of a Common Cold Treatment on Cognitive Function
NCT number
NCT01466348
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
72 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Common Cold
Interventions
Paracetamol and Caffeine, Paracetamol
First posted
2011-11-07
Last updated
2013-11-25
Results first posted
2013-11-25
Limitations and caveats
Apparent carryover effect from the paracetamol/ caffeine treatment taken in Period 1 into the baseline assessment of Period 2 was observed, hence the statistical analysis was amended after unblinding the statistician.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) Cognitive TestBaseline to 30 minutes post treatment administration
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and mean number of valid responses to stimulus was calculated.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestBaseline to 60 minutes post treatment administration
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and mean number of valid responses to stimulus was calculated.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change in Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to RVIP Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. Mean valid reaction time was determined.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and mean number of valid responses to stimulus was calculated.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Sustained Attention Tasks (SAT) Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
Auditory and visual attention of participants was evaluated using a validated Sustained Attention task. For the sustained visual attention task, participants were required to respond to the letter 's' every time it appears in a continuous stream of letters presented on a screen. For the sustained auditory attention task, participants responded to the number '8' every time it appears in a continuous stream of numbers presented through headphones. Total test duration was approximately 6 minutes. Mean values of valid responses to visual and auditory tests were calculated.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to SAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
Auditory and visual attention of participants was evaluated using a validated Sustained Attention task. For the sustained visual attention task, participants were required to respond to the letter 's' every time it appears in a continuous stream of letters presented on a screen. For the sustained auditory attention task, participants responded to the number '8' every time it appears in a continuous stream of numbers presented through headphones. Total test duration was approximately 6 minutes. Mean values of incorrect and missed responses to visual and auditory tests were calculated.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to SAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
Auditory and visual attention of participants was evaluated using a validated Sustained Attention task. For the sustained visual attention task, participants were required to respond to the letter 's' every time it appears in a continuous stream of letters presented on a screen. For the sustained auditory attention task, participants responded to the number '8' every time it appears in a continuous stream of numbers presented through headphones. Total test duration was approximately 6 minutes. Mean values of valid reaction time to visual and auditory tests were calculated.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Divided Attention Task (DAT) Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
For the DAT Cognitive test, auditory and visual stimuli were simultaneously presented and participants were asked to respond to occurrences of 's' (visual) or '8' (auditory). Total test duration was approximately 6 minutes. Mean values of valid responses to visual and auditory tests were calculated.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to DAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
For the DAT Cognitive test, auditory and visual stimuli were simultaneously presented and participants were asked to respond to occurrences of 's' (visual) or '8' (auditory). Total test duration was approximately 6 minutes. Mean values of valid reaction time to visual and auditory tests were calculated.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to DAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
For the DAT Cognitive test, auditory and visual stimuli were simultaneously presented and participants were asked to respond to occurrences of 's' (visual) or '8' (auditory). Total test duration was approximately 6 minutes. Mean values of incorrect and missed responses to visual and auditory tests were calculated.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) Cognitive TestBaseline to 30 minutes post treatment administrationIntent-To-Treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.Valid responsesMEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestBaseline to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.Valid responsesMEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change in Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to RVIP Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.milliseconds (msec)MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.ResponsesMEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Sustained Attention Tasks (SAT) Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.Valid responsesMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to SAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.ResponsesMEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to SAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.msecMEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Divided Attention Task (DAT) Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.Valid responsesMEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to DAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.msecMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to DAT Cognitive TestBaseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administrationITT population: All randomized participants who were randomized and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.ResponsesMEAN

Results by group60

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) Cognitive TestParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet4.8Standard Deviation 0.80Valid responses
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) Cognitive TestParacetamol Powder1.3Standard Deviation 0.80Valid responses
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet7.1Standard Deviation 0.93Valid responses
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol Powder0.6Standard Deviation 0.93Valid responses
Adjusted Mean Change in Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet30 minutes6.00Standard Error 3.916milliseconds (msec)
Adjusted Mean Change in Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol Powder30 minutes1.88Standard Error 3.916milliseconds (msec)
Adjusted Mean Change in Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet60 minutes0.08Standard Error 3.983milliseconds (msec)
Adjusted Mean Change in Baseline in Valid Reaction Time to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol Powder60 minutes-4.85Standard Error 3.954milliseconds (msec)
Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol/ Caffeine TabletIncorrect responses at 30 minutes-2.3Standard Error 1.57Responses
Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to RVIP Cognitive TestParacetamol PowderIncorrect responses at 30 minutes-2.7Standard Error 1.52Responses

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Period I - First InterventionSTARTEDParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet Then Paracetamol Powder36
Period I - First InterventionSTARTEDParacetamol Powder Then Paracetamol/ Caffeine Tablet36
Period I - First InterventionIntent To Treat (ITT) PopulationParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet Then Paracetamol Powder36
Period I - First InterventionIntent To Treat (ITT) PopulationParacetamol Powder Then Paracetamol/ Caffeine Tablet35
Period I - First InterventionCOMPLETEDParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet Then Paracetamol Powder36
Period I - First InterventionCOMPLETEDParacetamol Powder Then Paracetamol/ Caffeine Tablet35
Period I - First InterventionNOT COMPLETEDParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet Then Paracetamol Powder0
Period I - First InterventionNOT COMPLETEDParacetamol Powder Then Paracetamol/ Caffeine Tablet1
Period II - Second InterventionSTARTEDParacetamol/ Caffeine Tablet Then Paracetamol Powder35
Period II - Second InterventionSTARTEDParacetamol Powder Then Paracetamol/ Caffeine Tablet36

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityParacetamol/Caffeine Tablet
Total, all-cause mortalityParacetamol Powder
Total, other adverse eventsParacetamol/Caffeine Tablet071
Total, other adverse eventsParacetamol Powder071
Total, serious adverse eventsParacetamol/Caffeine Tablet071
Total, serious adverse eventsParacetamol Powder071

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Paracetamol/Caffeine Tablet vs Paracetamol Powder: serious adverse events

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Rapid Visual Information ProcessingPrimary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01466348

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01466348/results?page=2