ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01475825

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

NCT01475825, Phase 3, Completed, Kastle Therapeutics, LLC; results first posted 2019-03-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol. Trials, record NCT01475825. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01475825

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
NCT number
NCT01475825
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
309 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Kastle Therapeutics, LLC
Conditions
Hypercholesterolemia, Heterozygous Familial
Interventions
mipomersen sodium 200 mg, Placebo, mipomersen sodium 70 mg
First posted
2011-11-21
Last updated
2019-03-26
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-001480-42
Results first posted
2019-03-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61
The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 1, which included participants with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Severe HeFH was defined as LDL-C levels ≥200 mg/deciliter (dL) plus the presence of coronary heart disease (CHD)/risk equivalents or LDL-C levels ≥300 mg/dL regardless of the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2Baseline, PET (up to 60 weeks)
The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 2, which included participants with HeFH with LDL-C levels ≥160 mg/dL and \<200 mg/dL, plus the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 2Baseline and Week 61The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 2Baseline and Week 61The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61
The full analysis set for Cohort 1 included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug in Cohort 1 (mipomersen or placebo), had a valid baseline LDL-C measurement, and had at least 1 post-baseline LDL-C measurement.
PercentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2Baseline, PET (up to 60 weeks)
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug (mipomersen or placebo), had a valid baseline LDL-C measurement, and had at least 1 post-baseline LDL-C measurement.
PercentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug (mipomersen or placebo), had a valid baseline LDL-C measurement, and had at least 1 post-baseline LDL-C measurement.
PercentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 2Baseline and Week 61
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug (mipomersen or placebo), had a valid baseline LDL-C measurement, and had at least 1 post-baseline LDL-C measurement.
PercentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug (mipomersen or placebo), had a valid baseline LDL-C measurement, and had at least 1 post-baseline LDL-C measurement.
PercentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 2Baseline and Week 61
The full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug (mipomersen or placebo), had a valid baseline LDL-C measurement, and had at least 1 post-baseline LDL-C measurement.
PercentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1Regimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly-27.17Standard Error 5.653Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1Regimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly-6.77Standard Error 6.749Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1Regimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly-22.96Standard Error 5.362Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1Regimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly-10.62Standard Error 5.765Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2Regimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly-31.20Standard Error 8.927Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2Regimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly-9.25Standard Error 10.621Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2Regimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly-43.60Standard Error 8.342Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2Regimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly-13.57Standard Error 9.066Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 1Regimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly-24.14Standard Error 5.058Percent
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 1Regimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly-2.83Standard Error 6.115Percent

Participant flow28

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly104
Overall StudySTARTEDRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly51
Overall StudySTARTEDRegimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly102
Overall StudySTARTEDRegimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly52
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly104
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly51
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedRegimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly102
Overall StudyRandomized and TreatedRegimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly52
Overall StudyCompleted Blinded Treatment PeriodRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly60
Overall StudyCompleted Blinded Treatment PeriodRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly42

Adverse events416

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly43104
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly1051
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersRegimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly26102
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersRegimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly1052
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly8104
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly151
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersRegimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly13102
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersRegimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly152
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly13104
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly151

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly1104
Total, all-cause mortalityRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly051
Total, all-cause mortalityRegimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly1102
Total, all-cause mortalityRegimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly052
Total, other adverse eventsRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly82104
Total, other adverse eventsRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly2751
Total, other adverse eventsRegimen B: Mipomersen, 70 mg, Thrice Weekly78102
Total, other adverse eventsRegimen B: Placebo, Thrice Weekly3352
Total, serious adverse eventsRegimen A: Mipomersen, 200 mg, Once Weekly17104
Total, serious adverse eventsRegimen A: Placebo, Once Weekly1351

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
26946290DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01475825

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01475825/results?page=2