ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01482169

Intravenous Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Adenoscan® for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

NCT01482169, Not applicable, Completed, Ochsner Health System; results first posted 2018-05-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intravenous Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Adenoscan® for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). Trials, record NCT01482169. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01482169

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Intravenous Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Adenoscan® for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
NCT number
NCT01482169
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
48 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ochsner Health System
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Interventions
FFR Measurement with IV Adenoscan® then with Regadenoson
First posted
2011-11-30
Last updated
2018-05-11
Results first posted
2018-05-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryComparing Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)DAY 1
For the first measurement of FFR, the subject will receive Adenoscan® by IV infusion. Then the FFR measurements will be taken. When vital signs have returned to normal, after two minutes the line will be flushed with saline. The subject will then receive Regadenoson by IV infusion and repeat FFR measurements will be recorded. The subject will be administered aminophylline and the time duration it takes to return to baseline hemodynamic will be recorded.
SecondaryDuration to Baseline Hyperemia After Aminophylline InjectionsecondsIn the regadenoson arm, the duration to baseline hyperemia after aminophylline Injection

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYComparing Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)DAY 1FFRMEAN
SECONDARYDuration to Baseline Hyperemia After Aminophylline InjectionsecondsOf the 48 patients enrolled, 7 of the patients did not have measurements for the secondary outcome.secondsMEAN

Results by group3

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Comparing Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)Adenoscan.83Standard Deviation 0.082FFR
Comparing Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)Regadenoson.84Standard Deviation 0.084FFR
Duration to Baseline Hyperemia After Aminophylline InjectionDuration to Baseline Hyperemia After Aminophylline Administrat112Standard Deviation 72seconds

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAdenoscan + Regadenoson48
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAdenoscan + Regadenoson46
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAdenoscan + Regadenoson2

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAdenoscan
Total, all-cause mortalityRegadenson
Total, other adverse eventsAdenoscan048
Total, other adverse eventsRegadenson048
Total, serious adverse eventsAdenoscan048
Total, serious adverse eventsRegadenson048

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Adenoscan vs Regadenson: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01482169

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01482169/registered