ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01517893

Clinical Trial of Simvastatin to Treat Generalized Vitiligo

NCT01517893, Phase 2, Completed, John Harris; results first posted 2015-03-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Clinical Trial of Simvastatin to Treat Generalized Vitiligo. Trials, record NCT01517893. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01517893

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Clinical Trial of Simvastatin to Treat Generalized Vitiligo
NCT number
NCT01517893
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
15 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
John Harris
Conditions
Vitiligo
Interventions
Simvastatin, Placebo
First posted
2012-01-25
Last updated
2018-11-14
Results first posted
2015-03-12
Limitations and caveats
The following outcome measures were abandoned: 1.Decrease in CXCR3 exp. on CD8 positive T-Cells, 2.Corr. Among Var. Outcome Measures for Vitiligo: procedures not performed/no data collected due to strength of prior outcomes \& budget limitation.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Decrease in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) ScoreAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization
Number of participants with 33% decrease in the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) from baseline to the last available study visit. Decrease in VASI score means improvement. Minimum value is 0, that means no vitiligo. maximum value is 100, that means 100% of the body surface area has vitiligo (total body surface area).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Increase in Investigator's Global Assessment ScoreAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomizationIncrease in Investigator Global Assessment Scores of 30% or more from baseline to last available visit. Increase in score means improvement. 0% is no improvement at all. 100% is complete recovery.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Toxicity From of High-dose Simvastatin .Assessed at baseline, then monthly until final study visit, six months after randomization.The number of participants who experienced toxicity based upon monitored lab values (Liver Function Test) and patient symptoms for evidence of simvastatin toxicity
SecondaryChange in Sentinel Patch AreaAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization
Change in percent depigmentation of sentinel patch lesion from baseline to last available study visit ( 6 months after randomization). positive numbers mean increase or worsening of sentinel patch area negative numbers mean decrease or improvement of sentinel patch area
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life Score by Using DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX (DLQI)Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization
The aim of this questionnaire is to measure how much your skin problem has affected your life. We measured change in questionnaire score from baseline to end of study (at 6 months after randomization) of subjects randomized to treatment with simvastatin versus placebo. Change was measured as a drop in score at the end of 6 months of treatment. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 30. Higher value means worse score.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Increase in Patient's Global Assessment ScoreAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomizationIncrease in Patient's Global Assessment Scores of 30% or more from baseline to last available visit Increase means improvement. minimum is 0% and maximum is 100%
SecondarySerum CXCL10 Levels From the First and Last Available Clinic Visits Were Measured Via ELISAAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization
Determination of the effects of simvastatin treatment on Serum CXCL10 levels from the first and last available clinic visits were measured via ELISA in the blood of patients with vitiligo treated with simvastatin versus placebo
SecondaryCXCR3 Expression on CD8+ T CellsAssessed prior to treatment and periodically while on treatment
Determination of the effects of simvastatin treatment on CXCR3 expression in melanocyte-specific, autoreactive CD8+ T cells in the blood of patients with vitiligo treated with simvastatin versus placebo

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With a Decrease in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) ScoreAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomizationOverall number of participants for intervention (5) differs from enrollment (8) due to withdraw of 3 participants on intervention arm.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Increase in Investigator's Global Assessment ScoreAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomizationFor placebo arm, only 6 out of 7 participants reported data.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Experiencing Toxicity From of High-dose Simvastatin .Assessed at baseline, then monthly until final study visit, six months after randomization.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in Sentinel Patch AreaAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomizationcm2MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Quality of Life Score by Using DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX (DLQI)Assessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomizationunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With an Increase in Patient's Global Assessment ScoreAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomizationPlacebo arm reports 6 instead of enrolled 7 due to failure of participant to complete assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYSerum CXCL10 Levels From the First and Last Available Clinic Visits Were Measured Via ELISAAssessed at baseline and final study visit, 6 months after randomization
Serum CXCL10 levels from the first and last available clinic visits were measured via ELISA. The mean and SEM are reported here. One participant in intervention group was not included because participant withdrew before a second CXCL10 level was obtained. Other withdrawn participants were included, using the CXCL10 from their final visits.
Fold change of baseline CXCL10 levelMEAN
SECONDARYCXCR3 Expression on CD8+ T CellsAssessed prior to treatment and periodically while on treatmentNo data collected as this outcome was abandoned due to budget constraints and strength of other study results.

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With a Decrease in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) ScoreIntervention Arm0Participants
Number of Participants With a Decrease in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) ScorePlacebo Arm0Participants
Number of Participants With Increase in Investigator's Global Assessment ScoreIntervention Arm1Participants
Number of Participants With Increase in Investigator's Global Assessment ScorePlacebo Arm0Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity From of High-dose Simvastatin .Intervention Arm0Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity From of High-dose Simvastatin .Placebo Arm0Participants
Change in Sentinel Patch AreaIntervention Arm-0.2272Standard Deviation 3.463cm2
Change in Sentinel Patch AreaPlacebo Arm3.8571Standard Deviation 9.17cm2
Change in Quality of Life Score by Using DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX (DLQI)Intervention Arm3.4Standard Deviation 4.159326869units on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Score by Using DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX (DLQI)Placebo Arm2.285714286Standard Deviation 2.690370837units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDIntervention Arm8
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Arm7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntervention Arm5
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Arm7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntervention Arm3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Arm0

Adverse events36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherback painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersIntervention Arm08
otherback painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo Arm17
otherleg twingeMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersIntervention Arm08
otherleg twingeMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo Arm17
otherdiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersIntervention Arm18
otherdiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Arm27
otherabdominal painGastrointestinal disordersIntervention Arm08
otherabdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Arm17
othertinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersIntervention Arm08
othertinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo Arm17

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityIntervention Arm
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Arm
Total, other adverse eventsIntervention Arm48
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Arm47
Total, serious adverse eventsIntervention Arm18
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Arm07

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Intervention Arm vs Placebo Arm: Number of Participants With Increase in Investigator's Global Assessment ScoreTrial comparisons
Intervention Arm vs Placebo Arm: Number of Participants With a Decrease in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) ScoreTrial comparisons
Intervention Arm vs Placebo Arm: Number of Participants With an Increase in Patient's Global Assessment ScoreTrial comparisons
Intervention Arm vs Placebo Arm: Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity From of High-dose Simvastatin .Trial comparisons
Intervention Arm vs Placebo Arm: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01517893

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01517893/events?page=2