ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01529268

Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-Release for the Treatment of NAFLD in Children

NCT01529268, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); results first posted 2017-09-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-Release for the Treatment of NAFLD in Children. Trials, record NCT01529268. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01529268

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-Release for the Treatment of NAFLD in Children
NCT number
NCT01529268
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
169 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Conditions
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
Interventions
DR cysteamine bitartrate capsule, DR cysteamine bitartrate placebo
First posted
2012-02-08
Last updated
2021-06-10
Results first posted
2017-09-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes25

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryImprovement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)52 weeks
Centrally scored and masked assessment of histologic improvement in Nonalcholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) between the baseline liver biopsy and follow-up biopsy after 52 weeks of treatment, where improvement is defined as: (1) decrease in the NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) of 2 or more and (2) no worsening of fibrosis.
SecondaryChange in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS)52 weeks
Change from baseline in the NAFLD Activity Score (NAS), which is a composite score equal to the sum of the steatosis grade (0-3), lobular inflammation grade (0-3), and hepatocellular ballooning grade (0-2), from centralized pathologist scoring of liver biopsies. The overall scale of the NAS is 0-8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The outcome measure, change from baseline in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS), has a possible range from -8 to +8, with negative values indicating a better outcome (improvement) and positive values indicating a worse outcome. Components of the NAS are scored as follows: Steatosis grade 0=\<5% steatosis, 1=5-33% steatosis, 2=34-66% steatosis, 3=\>66% steatosis. Lobular inflammation grade=amount of lobular inflammation (combines mononuclear, fat granulomas, and polymorphonuclear (pmn) foci): 0=0, 1=\<2 under 20x magnification, 2=2-4 under 20x magnification, 3=\>4 under 20x magnification. Hepatocellular ballooning 0=none, 1=mild, 2=more than mild.
SecondarySteatosis: Patients With Improvement52 weeksImprovement in steatosis defined as any decrease in steatosis grade comparing 52-week biopsy to baseline.
SecondarySteatosis: Change in Score52 weeks
Change from baseline in steatosis score. Steatosis score is based on central pathologist grading of liver biopsies: 0=\<5% steatosis; 1=5-33% steatosis, 2=34-66% steatosis, 3=\>66% steatosis. Change in steatosis score has a possible range of -3 to +3, with negative values indicating a better outcome (improvement) and positive values indicating a worse outcome (no improvement).
SecondaryLobular Inflammation: Patients With Improvement52 weeksImprovement in lobular inflammation defined as any decrease in lobular inflammation grade comparing 52-week biopsy to baseline.
SecondaryLobular Inflammation: Change in Score52 weeks
Change from baseline in lobular inflammation score. The amount of lobular inflammation is based on central pathologist grading of liver biopsies, and combines mononuclear, fat granulomas, and polymorphonuclear (pmn) foci: 0=none; 1=\<2 under 20x magnification, 2=2-4 under 20x magnification, 3=\>4 under 20x magnification. Change in lobular inflammation score has a possible range of -3 to +3, with negative values indicating a better outcome (improvement) and positive values indicating a worse outcome (no improvement).
SecondaryHepatocellular Ballooning: Patients With Improvement52 weeksImprovement in hepatocellular ballooning defined as any decrease in hepatocellular ballooning score comparing 52-week biopsy to baseline.
SecondaryHepatocellular Ballooning: Change in Score52 weeks
Change from baseline in hepatocellular ballooning score. The amount of hepatocellular ballooning is based on central pathologist grading of liver biopsies: 0=none; 1=few ballooned hepatocytes, 2=many ballooned hepatocytes. Change in hepatocellular ballooning score has a possible range of -2 to +2, with negative values indicating a better outcome (improvement) and positive values indicating a worse outcome (no improvement).
SecondaryPortal Inflammation: Patients With Improvement52 weeksImprovement in portal inflammation defined as any decrease in portal inflammation score comparing 52-week biopsy to baseline.
SecondaryPortal Inflammation: Change in Score52 weeks
Change from baseline in portal inflammation score. The amount of portal inflammation is based on central pathologist grading of liver biopsies: 0=none; 1=mild, 2=more than mild. Change in portal inflammation score has a possible range of -2 to +2, with negative values indicating a better outcome (improvement) and positive values indicating a worse outcome (no improvement).

Outcomes25

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYImprovement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)52 weeksAnalysis based on intention to treat; patients with missing 52-week biopsy were imputed as lack of improvement.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS)52 weeksThe smaller number of participants analyzed is due to missing 52-week biopsies (complete case analysis).units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSteatosis: Patients With Improvement52 weeksAnalysis based on intention to treat; patients with missing 52-week biopsy were imputed as lack of improvement.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSteatosis: Change in Score52 weeksThe smaller number of participants analyzed is due to missing 52-week biopsies (complete case analysis).units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYLobular Inflammation: Patients With Improvement52 weeksAnalysis based on intention to treat; patients with missing 52-week biopsy were imputed as lack of improvement.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYLobular Inflammation: Change in Score52 weeksThe smaller number of participants analyzed is due to missing 52-week biopsies (complete case analysis).units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYHepatocellular Ballooning: Patients With Improvement52 weeksAnalysis based on intention to treat; patients with missing 52-week biopsy were imputed as lack of improvement.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYHepatocellular Ballooning: Change in Score52 weeksThe smaller number of participants analyzed is due to missing 52-week biopsies (complete case analysis).units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPortal Inflammation: Patients With Improvement52 weeksAnalysis based on intention to treat; patients with missing 52-week biopsy were imputed as lack of improvement.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPortal Inflammation: Change in Score52 weeksThe smaller number of participants analyzed is due to missing 52-week biopsies (complete case analysis).units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group60

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Improvement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule25participants
Improvement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo18participants
Change in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS)DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule-0.8Standard Deviation 1.8units on a scale
Change in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS)DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo-0.8Standard Deviation 1.8units on a scale
Steatosis: Patients With ImprovementDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule26participants
Steatosis: Patients With ImprovementDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo33participants
Steatosis: Change in ScoreDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule-0.3Standard Deviation 0.9units on a scale
Steatosis: Change in ScoreDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo-0.4Standard Deviation 0.9units on a scale
Lobular Inflammation: Patients With ImprovementDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule32participants
Lobular Inflammation: Patients With ImprovementDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo17participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule88
Overall StudySTARTEDDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo81
Overall StudyCompleted 52-week BiopsyDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule71
Overall StudyCompleted 52-week BiopsyDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo75
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule76
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo78
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo3

Adverse events218

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPain - abdomen NOSGastrointestinal disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule118811
otherPain - abdomen NOSGastrointestinal disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo8819
otherOcular - otherEye disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule1881
otherOcular - otherEye disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo0810
otherAllergic reactionImmune system disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule1881
otherAllergic reactionImmune system disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo1811
otherRhinitisImmune system disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule3883
otherRhinitisImmune system disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo5815
otherAllergy - otherImmune system disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule0880
otherAllergy - otherImmune system disordersDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo1811

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule088
Total, all-cause mortalityDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo081
Total, other adverse eventsDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule6288
Total, other adverse eventsDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo5581
Total, serious adverse eventsDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule588
Total, serious adverse eventsDR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo481

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27569726DERIVEDPubMed
38055641DERIVEDPubMed
40434633DERIVEDPubMed

Grants9

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U01DK061713Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN)DIEHL, ANNA MAE ELIZABETHDUKE UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061718The Saint Louis University Component of the NASH Clinical Research NetworkNEUSCHWANDER-TETRI, BRENT ASAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061728Clinical Research Network in Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisKOWDLEY, KRISLIVER INSTITUTE NORTHWEST PLLCNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061731Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN)SANYAL, ARUN JVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061732Continuation of the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) Clinical Center-Cleveland siteDASARATHY, SRINIVASANCLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRUNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061734Clinical Research on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseLOOMBA, ROHITUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGONATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061737Collaborative Clinical Research in Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisCHALASANI, NAGA PINDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLISNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061738Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN)TERRAULT, NORAH A.UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIANATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2025NIH RePORTER
U01DK061730Continuation of the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research NetworkTONASCIA, JAMES AJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2002 to 2018NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons9

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: Portal Inflammation: Patients With ImprovementTrial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: Improvement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)Trial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: Fibrosis: Patients With ImprovementTrial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: Lobular Inflammation: Patients With ImprovementTrial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: Steatosis: Patients With ImprovementTrial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: Hepatocellular Ballooning: Patients With ImprovementTrial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: Resolution of NASHTrial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Capsule vs DR Cysteamine Bitartrate Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01529268

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01529268/registered?page=2