ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01533428

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Application of Capsaicin 8%Transdermal Delivery System Compared to Placebo in Reducing Pain Intensity in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN)

NCT01533428, Phase 3, Completed, Astellas Pharma Inc; results first posted 2015-03-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Application of Capsaicin 8%Transdermal Delivery System Compared to Placebo in Reducing Pain Intensity in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN). Trials, record NCT01533428. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01533428

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Application of Capsaicin 8%Transdermal Delivery System Compared to Placebo in Reducing Pain Intensity in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN)
NCT number
NCT01533428
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
369 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc
Conditions
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Pain
Interventions
Capsaicin 8%, Placebo
First posted
2012-02-15
Last updated
2015-11-04
Results first posted
2015-03-13
Limitations and caveats
Company makes no warranties or representations of any kind as to the posting, expressed or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not be liable for any damages.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8Baseline to between Weeks 2 to 8
Percent change in the average daily pain score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 8, measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
SecondaryPercent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12Baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
SecondaryWeekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScoreBaseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12
Weekly Percent Change from baseline in average daily pain score from baseline to Week 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
SecondaryWeekly Average of Average Daily Pain at Baseline and Every Week After BaselineBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Weekly average of average daily pain score at Baseline and Weeks 2,4,8 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Percentage of participants achieving 30% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Percentage of participants achieving 50% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
SecondaryOverall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 2Baseline to Week 2
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 2
SecondaryOverall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 8Baseline to Week 8
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 8
SecondaryOverall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 12Baseline to Week 12
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 12
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) Questionnaire in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) With Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Change from Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) questionnaire in 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12. EQ-5D self-reported questionnaire is used to measure health-related quality of life by measuring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D questionnaire includes a visual analog scale (VAS) which records participants self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale with higher scores indicating higher Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8Baseline to between Weeks 2 to 8Intention to Treat (ITT); Baseline Last Observation Carried Forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12Baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12Intention to Treat (ITT); Baseline Last Observation Carried Forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYWeekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScoreBaseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12Intention to Treat (ITT ); Baseline last observation carried forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYWeekly Average of Average Daily Pain at Baseline and Every Week After BaselineBaseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Intention to Treat (ITT); Baseline Last Observation Carried Forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12Intention to Treat (ITT ); Baseline last observation carried forward(BLOCF) imputation was used.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12Intention to Treat (ITT ); Baseline last observation carried forward(BLOCF) imputation was used.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 2Baseline to Week 2Intention to Treat (ITT); Baseline Last Observation Carried Forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 8Baseline to Week 8Intention to Treat (ITT); Baseline Last Observation Carried Forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 12Baseline to Week 12Intention to Treat (ITT); Baseline Last Observation Carried Forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) Questionnaire in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) With Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12Intention to Treat (ITT); Baseline and Last Observation Carried Forward (BLOCF) imputation was used.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group178

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8Capsaicin 8%-27.44Standard Deviation 26.79percentage change
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8Placebo-20.85Standard Deviation 28.92percentage change
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12Capsaicin 8%-27.96Standard Deviation 27.25percentage change
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12Placebo-21.00Standard Deviation 29.42percentage change
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScoreCapsaicin 8%Week 2-22.97Standard Deviation 26.24percentage change
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScorePlaceboWeek 2-19.00Standard Deviation 27.99percentage change
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScoreCapsaicin 8%Week 3-27.17Standard Deviation 27.28percentage change
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScorePlaceboWeek 3-20.51Standard Deviation 29.96percentage change
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScoreCapsaicin 8%Week 4-28.18Standard Deviation 28.15percentage change
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain ScorePlaceboWeek 4-21.11Standard Deviation 30.52percentage change

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCapsaicin 8%186
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo183
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCapsaicin 8%177
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo175
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCapsaicin 8%9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo8

Adverse events26

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherApplication site painGeneral disordersCapsaicin 8%18186
otherApplication site painGeneral disordersPlacebo4183
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersCapsaicin 8%20186
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo10183
otherBurning sensationNervous system disordersCapsaicin 8%26186
otherBurning sensationNervous system disordersPlacebo5183
seriousChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersCapsaicin 8%0186
seriousChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo2183
seriousCoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersCapsaicin 8%0186
seriousCoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersPlacebo1183

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCapsaicin 8%
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsCapsaicin 8%61186
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo18183
Total, serious adverse eventsCapsaicin 8%2186
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo7183

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
27746370DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Capsaicin 8% vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01533428

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01533428/results?page=2