ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01544309

LIpid Lowering With Highly Potent Statins in Hyperlipidaemia With Type 2 Diabetes patiENts

NCT01544309, Not applicable, Completed, Listen Trial Group; results first posted 2015-03-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. LIpid Lowering With Highly Potent Statins in Hyperlipidaemia With Type 2 Diabetes patiENts. Trials, record NCT01544309. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01544309

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
LIpid Lowering With Highly Potent Statins in Hyperlipidaemia With Type 2 Diabetes patiENts
NCT number
NCT01544309
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
1,049 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Listen Trial Group
Conditions
Hypercholesterolemia With Concomitant Type 2 Diabetes
Interventions
Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin
First posted
2012-03-05
Last updated
2015-03-17
Results first posted
2015-03-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) LevelBaseline, and 12 months after administration
PrimaryChange in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 12 months after administration
SecondaryOccurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 12 months after administration"Deterioration of diabetic treatment status" is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration"Deterioration of diabetic treatment status" is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.
SecondaryPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa
SecondaryChange in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 3, 6 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
SecondaryPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
SecondaryChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
SecondaryPercent Change in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) LevelBaseline, and 12 months after administrationParticipants in full analysis set (FAS) except the ones who had no HDL-C data at 12 months.Percent changeMEAN
PRIMARYChange in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 12 months after administrationParticipants in FAS except the ones who had no HbA1c data at 12 months.Amount of change (%)MEAN
SECONDARYOccurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 12 months after administration
Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug except the ones who had no HbA1c or non-HDL-C data or a protocol deviation of the administration of study drugs.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration
Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug except the ones who had no HbA1c or non-HDL-C data or a protocol deviation of the administration of study drugs.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)Participants in FAS except the ones who had no 1,5-AG data at 12 months.Percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 3, 6 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug.Amount of change (%)MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)Participants in FAS except the ones who had no blood glucose level data at 12 months.Percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)mg/dLMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drugPercent changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug.μU/mLMEAN

Results by group114

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) LevelAtorvastatin Administration Group-31.3Standard Deviation 19.1Percent change
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) LevelRosuvastatin Administration Group-32.8Standard Deviation 18.1Percent change
Change in HbA1c LevelAtorvastatin Administration Group0.120Standard Deviation 0.65Amount of change (%)
Change in HbA1c LevelRosuvastatin Administration Group0.10Standard Deviation 0.67Amount of change (%)
Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusAtorvastatin Administration GroupTherapy intensification64Participants
Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusRosuvastatin Administration GroupTherapy intensification45Participants
Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusAtorvastatin Administration GroupDeterioration in HbA1c of > 0.5%177Participants
Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusRosuvastatin Administration GroupDeterioration in HbA1c of > 0.5%162Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusAtorvastatin Administration GroupTherapy intensification: 0-3 months20participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusRosuvastatin Administration GroupTherapy intensification: 0-3 months14participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAtorvastatin Administration Group524
Overall StudySTARTEDRosuvastatin Administration Group525
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAtorvastatin Administration Group504
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRosuvastatin Administration Group514
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAtorvastatin Administration Group20
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRosuvastatin Administration Group11

Adverse events382

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsAtorvastatin Administration Group13506
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin Administration Group15516
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsAtorvastatin Administration Group3506
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin Administration Group3516
otherCystitisInfections and infestationsAtorvastatin Administration Group1506
otherCystitisInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin Administration Group5516
otherPneumoniaInfections and infestationsAtorvastatin Administration Group0506
otherPneumoniaInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin Administration Group2516
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsAtorvastatin Administration Group2506
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin Administration Group2516

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAtorvastatin Administration Group
Total, all-cause mortalityRosuvastatin Administration Group
Total, other adverse eventsAtorvastatin Administration Group87506
Total, other adverse eventsRosuvastatin Administration Group88516
Total, serious adverse eventsAtorvastatin Administration Group14506
Total, serious adverse eventsRosuvastatin Administration Group19516

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25186922DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Atorvastatin Administration Group vs Rosuvastatin Administration Group: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01544309

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01544309/results?page=2