ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01555463

Safety and Efficacy of Azelaic Acid Foam, 15 % in Papulopustular Rosacea

NCT01555463, Phase 3, Completed, LEO Pharma; results first posted 2015-01-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of Azelaic Acid Foam, 15 % in Papulopustular Rosacea. Trials, record NCT01555463. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01555463

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Azelaic Acid Foam, 15 % in Papulopustular Rosacea
NCT number
NCT01555463
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
961 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
LEO Pharma
Conditions
Papulopustular Rosacea
Interventions
Azelaic acid foam, 15% (BAY39-6251), Vehicle foam
First posted
2012-03-15
Last updated
2023-06-09
Results first posted
2015-01-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Static evaluation of overall severity of papulopustular rosacea at a given time: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal.
PrimaryNominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe mean (standard deviation) change from baseline in the inflammatory lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe mean (standard deviation) percentage change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to end of study is provided.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Participants achieving a clear, minimal, or mild IGA at the end of treatment were considered as 'responder'. Participants with an IGA of moderate or severe at the end of treatment were considered as 'non-responder'. Participants who prematurely withdraw from study treatment because of lack of efficacy were coded as 'non-responders'. The percentage of responders is presented.
SecondaryGrouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Erythema was rated as: clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; or severe. For the assessment of the grouped change in erythema ratings, the baseline examination was used to group into 'improved', 'no change', or 'worsened'. A participant was considered to have an 'improved' erythema rating if the erythema rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each of these categories is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
The IGA consists of 5 scores: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. The percentage of participants with each score at the end of treatment is provided.
SecondaryNominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe mean (standard deviation) lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe percentage of participants in each rating category of erythema (clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; severe) at the end of treatment is provided.
SecondaryGrouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Telangiectasia was rated as: no; mild; moderate; or severe. At the end of study, a participant was considered to have an 'improved' telangiectasia rating if the telangiectasia rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each category is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Facial skin color (as compared with skin outside the treatment area) was rated as: normal; barely visible skin lightening; mild skin lightening; moderate skin lightening; severe skin lightening. The percentage of participants in each category of facial skin color at the end of study is presented.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Inflammatory lesionsMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percent change of inflammatory lesionsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGrouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Inflammatory lesionsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGrouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group102

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)32.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)Vehicle Foam23.4Percentage of participants
Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)-13.2Standard Deviation 9.5Inflammatory lesions
Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Vehicle Foam-10.3Standard Deviation 9.8Inflammatory lesions
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)-61.6Standard Deviation 33.5Percent change of inflammatory lesions
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Vehicle Foam-50.8Standard Deviation 40.0Percent change of inflammatory lesions
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)66.3Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)Vehicle Foam54.4Percentage of participants
Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Improved61.5Percentage of participants
Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Vehicle FoamImproved51.3Percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
TreatmentSTARTEDAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)483
TreatmentSTARTEDVehicle Foam478
TreatmentCOMPLETEDAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)419
TreatmentCOMPLETEDVehicle Foam399
TreatmentNOT COMPLETEDAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)64
TreatmentNOT COMPLETEDVehicle Foam79
Follow upSTARTEDAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)447
Follow upSTARTEDVehicle Foam439
Follow upCOMPLETEDAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)409
Follow upCOMPLETEDVehicle Foam394

Adverse events314

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)14831
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersVehicle Foam04780
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)14831
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersVehicle Foam04780
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)14831
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersVehicle Foam04780
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)14831
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersVehicle Foam04780
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disordersAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)14831
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disordersVehicle Foam04780

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle Foam
Total, other adverse eventsAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)148483
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle Foam117478
Total, serious adverse eventsAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)3483
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle Foam4478

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
26244354RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) vs Vehicle Foam: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01555463

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01555463/results?page=2