Trial · NCT01561703
Comparing Healthcare Utilization Between Adenotonsillectomy Patients With and Without Postoperative Antibiotic Use
NCT01561703, Not applicable, Completed, University of Missouri-Columbia; results first posted 2017-01-19
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Comparing Healthcare Utilization Between Adenotonsillectomy Patients With and Without Postoperative Antibiotic Use. Trials, record NCT01561703. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01561703
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Comparing Healthcare Utilization Between Adenotonsillectomy Patients With and Without Postoperative Antibiotic Use
- NCT number
- NCT01561703
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 58 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Conditions
- Snoring, Strep Throat
- Interventions
- Antibiotic
- First posted
- 2012-03-23
- Last updated
- 2017-01-19
- Results first posted
- 2017-01-19
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes1
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Healthcare Utilization | 6 wks post-operative appointment | Questionnaire designed to evaluate healthcare utilization following surgery. Unit of measure will be the number of participants utilizing each category of healthcare. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes1
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Healthcare Utilization | 6 wks post-operative appointment | participants | NUMBER |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group10
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare Utilization | Intervention | Reported Fever | 5 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Control | Reported Fever | 16 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Intervention | Made a phone call to clinic | 5 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Control | Made a phone call to clinic | 8 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Intervention | ER/UR/Clinic visit | 2 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Control | ER/UR/Clinic visit | 9 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Intervention | Received additional antibiotic | 0 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Control | Received additional antibiotic | 6 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Intervention | Diagnostic workup at ER | 0 | participants | |
| Healthcare Utilization | Control | Diagnostic workup at ER | 6 | participants |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Participant flow6
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Intervention | 28 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Control | 30 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Intervention | 20 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Control | 24 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Intervention | 8 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Control | 6 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Intervention | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Control | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Intervention | 0 | 20 |
| Total, other adverse events | Control | 0 | 24 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Intervention | 0 | 20 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Control | 0 | 24 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers4
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons1
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison |
|---|
| Intervention vs Control: serious adverse events |
Source Trial comparisons
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01561703
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01561703/registered