ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Efficacy of Lu AA21004 on Cognitive Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder

NCT01564862, Phase 2, Completed, Takeda; results first posted 2015-02-05

Trial 12

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEfficacy of Lu AA21004 on Cognitive Dysfunction in Major Depressive DisorderClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT01564862ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPhase 2ClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment602 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorTakedaClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionsvortioxetine (Lu AA21004), Duloxetine, PlaceboClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2012-03-28ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2015-02-05ClinicalTrials.gov
Other registries' IDseudract:2011-005298-22ClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2015-02-05ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)Baseline and Week 8
The DSST assesses relative contributions of speed, memory, executive function and visual scanning. Participants are required to copy symbols that are paired with simple geometric shapes or numbers within a specific time for a total possible score of 0 to 133. Higher scores-correct number of symbols reflects greater objective cognitive functioning. An increase in score represents an improvement in an integrated measure of cognitive function. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) Attention/Concentration and Planning/Organization SubscoreBaseline and Week 8
PDQ is a patient-rated scale designed to subjectively assess cognitive dysfunction, comprising four 5-item subscales: Attention/Concentration, Retrospective Memory, Prospective Memory, and Planning/Organization for a total possible score of 0 to 40. The subscale Attention/Concentration is the sum of items 1, 5, 9, 13, and 17 with a range of 0-20; while the subscale Planning/Organization is the sum of items 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 with the score range of 0 to 20. The scores of the subscales Attention/Concentration and Planning/Organization were summed. Higher scores reflect greater participant-perceived cognitive dysfunction in the domains identified. A decrease in score represents an improvement in subjective cognitive function in the domains identified. A Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model was used with baseline\*week, center, week, treatment and week\*treatment as factors in the analysis.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryClinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The CGI-I assesses the clinician's impression of the subject's state of mental illness improvement and consists of one question for the investigator: "Compared to his condition at the start of the study, how much has this patient changed?" which is rated on a seven-point scale (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change relative to baseline; 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse). Higher scores indicate greater worsening of illness. Values closest to 1 for this outcome measure indicate the greatest improvement of symptoms. A MMRM model was used with baseline\*week, center, week, treatment and week\*treatment as factors in the analysis.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test (TMT-A)Baseline and Week 8
The TMT is a two-part cognitive test. TMT-A assesses cognitive processing speed and consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. Participants have 4 minutes to connect the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting the pen or pencil from the paper. Tester informs participant immediately whenever they make an error and allows for corrections by participants. Lower scores represent better speed of processing. A decrease in score over the study represents an improvement in speed in processing. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)Baseline and Week 8
The TMT is a two-part cognitive test. TMT-B assesses executive functioning and consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. Participants have 4 minutes to connect the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting the pen or pencil from the paper. Tester informs participant immediately whenever they make an error and allows for corrections by participants. Lower score for TMT-B represents better executive function. A decrease in score over the study represents an improvement in executive function. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop TestBaseline and Week 8
The STROOP test assesses the ability to inhibit a prepotent response to reading words while performing a task that requires attention control. It comprises of 2 sheets with 50 words each, up to 50 correct responses for each of the congruent and incongruent Stroop tests. Participants have 4 minutes to name the ink color of each word. Lower time to complete the test indicates better performance. Higher number of correct responses indicates better responses. A decrease in the time to complete the tests and an increase in the number of correct responses both indicate improvement over the course of the study. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Groton Maze Learning Test (GMLT)Baseline and Week 8
The GMLT measures executive functioning and spatial problem solving. Participants learn a hidden pathway through a maze of 10 x 10 grid of tiles on a computer touch screen using step-by-step guess, with trial and error feedback after each step. Once the pathway is learned, participants repeat the same pathway four more times. It usually takes 5-6 minutes to administer this test. Lower score equals better performance. A decrease in score over the course of the study indicates improved executive function. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Detection Task (DT)Baseline and Week 8
The DT is a computerized test that measures simple reaction time and psychomotor speed. The task requires participants to respond by pressing a "yes" button as soon as an onscreen playing card is turned over and is red, and by pressing a "no" button if the card is not red. It takes 2 minutes to be administered. There is no minimum or maximum scores since it is a time-based assessment. Lower score equals better performance. A decrease in score over the course of the study indicates improved speed of processing and psychomotor function. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Identification Task (IT)Baseline and Week 8
The IT measured choice reaction time: the participant pressed a "yes" button whenever an onscreen playing card turned face up and was red, or a "no" button if the card was not red. The IT took on average 2 minutes to complete. Lower scores equal better performance. A decrease in score over the course of the study indicates improved visual attention/vigilance. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the One-Back TaskBaseline and Week 8
The One-Back test measures the cognitive domain of attention and working memory through yes or no responses to 30 trials. The task requires participants to report when a stimulus item presented serially is the same as an item one step back from the item at hand for a total correct responses 0 to 100. It usually takes 2-3 minutes to be administered. Higher scores equal better performance. An increase in score over the course of the study indicates improved attention/working memory. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryProportion of Cognitive Dysfunction Improvement Due to Improvement of DepressionBaseline and Week 8
Improvement of Cognitive Dysfunction is determined using the change from Baseline to Week 8 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score and the Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) total number of correct symbols. The MADRS is a 10-item clinician rated scale to measure overall severity of depressive symptoms (such as apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension) rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe depression). The DSST assesses relative contributions of speed, memory, executive function and visual scanning. The proportion of direct effect from treatment = DSST difference / (DSST difference + coefficient\*MADRS difference).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the MADRS Total ScoreBaseline, Week 1, Week 4 and Week 8
MADRS is a 10-item clinician rated scale to measure overall severity of depressive symptoms (such as apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension) rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe depression) with a total possible score range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
MADRS is a 10-item clinician rated scale to measure overall severity of depressive symptoms (such as apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension) rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe depression) with a total possible score range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. MADRS Response was defined as a ≥50% decrease in MADRS Total Score from Baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPercentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Week 8Week 8
MADRS is a 10-item clinician rated scale to measure overall severity of depressive symptoms (such as apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension) rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe depression) with a total possible score range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. MADRS Remission was defined as a MADRS total score ≤10.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) ScoreBaseline, Week 1, Week 4 and Week 8
The CGI-S assesses the clinician's impression of the subject's current state of mental illness and consists of one question for the investigator: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated on a seven-point scale (1=normal, not ill at all; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill). A MMRM model with baseline\*week, center, week, treatment and week\*treatment as factors was used for analyses.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)Baseline and Week 8
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Participants with scores of \> 70 at Baseline were excluded.
Correct symbolsLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) Attention/Concentration and Planning/Organization SubscoreBaseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy,with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYClinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test (TMT-A)Baseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
secondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)Baseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
secondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop TestBaseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
secondsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Groton Maze Learning Test (GMLT)Baseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
ErrorsLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Detection Task (DT)Baseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
Log10 millisecondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Identification Task (IT)Baseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
Log10 millisecondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the One-Back TaskBaseline and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy, with data available for analysis.
Log 10 millisecondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYProportion of Cognitive Dysfunction Improvement Due to Improvement of DepressionBaseline and Week 8Full Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment.proportion of direct effectNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the MADRS Total ScoreBaseline, Week 1, Week 4 and Week 8
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Last Observation Carried Forward.
score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Last Observation Carried Forward.
percentage of participantsNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Week 8Week 8
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Last Observation Carried Forward.
percentage of participantsNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) ScoreBaseline, Week 1, Week 4 and Week 8
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy,with data available for analysis. Repeated Measures Analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov

Results by group 59

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)4.60Standard Error 0.530Correct symbolsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)Duloxetine4.06Standard Error 0.511Correct symbolsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)Placebo2.85Standard Error 0.542Correct symbolsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) Attention/Concentration and Planning/Organization SubscoreVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)-8.9Standard Error 0.55score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) Attention/Concentration and Planning/Organization SubscoreDuloxetine-9.3Standard Error 0.53score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) Attention/Concentration and Planning/Organization SubscorePlacebo-6.3Standard Error 0.57score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)2.349Standard Error 0.0852score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8Duloxetine2.235Standard Error 0.0826score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8Placebo2.639Standard Error 0.0872score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test (TMT-A)Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)-7.70Standard Error 0.980secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test (TMT-A)Duloxetine-8.06Standard Error 0.955secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test (TMT-A)Placebo-6.65Standard Error 1.009secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)-18.73Standard Error 2.096secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)Duloxetine-14.60Standard Error 2.011secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)Placebo-9.06Standard Error 2.101secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop TestVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)Congruent (n=174,187,167)-3.30Standard Deviation 1.086secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop TestDuloxetineCongruent (n=174,187,167)-4.54Standard Deviation 1.044secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop TestPlaceboCongruent (n=174,187,167)-4.37Standard Deviation 1.105secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop TestVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)Incongruent (n=172,186,166)-8.17Standard Deviation 1.560secondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop TestDuloxetineIncongruent (n=172,186,166)-9.83Standard Deviation 1.498secondsClinicalTrials.gov

Participant flow 12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource
Overall StudySTARTEDVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)198ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudySTARTEDDuloxetine210ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo194ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)196ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentDuloxetine207ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentPlacebo191ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)168ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDuloxetine176ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo164ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)30ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDuloxetine34ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo30ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse events 36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)40196ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersDuloxetine43207ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo8191ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)11196ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDuloxetine6207ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo5191ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)6196ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersDuloxetine16207ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo9191ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)7196ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsDuloxetine8207ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo11191ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)3196ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersDuloxetine12207ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo1191ClinicalTrials.gov
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)20196ClinicalTrials.gov
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDuloxetine24207ClinicalTrials.gov
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo16191ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)6196ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersDuloxetine11207ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse event totals 9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource
Total, all-cause mortalityVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityDuloxetineClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityPlaceboClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)73196ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsDuloxetine84207ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo41191ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsVortioxetine (Lu AA21004)1196ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsDuloxetine1207ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo2191ClinicalTrials.gov

Papers 6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
28213121DERIVEDPubMed
29235884DERIVEDPubMed
29546401DERIVEDPubMed
29689693DERIVEDPubMed
30439678DERIVEDPubMed
31422713DERIVEDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 8

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Symbol CodingPrimary outcomeConductCognition
1-Back TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Choice Reaction TimeSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Hidden Path LearningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Simple Reaction TimeSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)