ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01572844

Topical Sodium Thiosulfate and Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Treating Dermatomyositis Associated Calcinosis

NCT01572844, Phase 2, Completed, Alison Ehrlich; results first posted 2017-11-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Topical Sodium Thiosulfate and Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Treating Dermatomyositis Associated Calcinosis. Trials, record NCT01572844. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01572844

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Topical Sodium Thiosulfate and Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Treating Dermatomyositis Associated Calcinosis
NCT number
NCT01572844
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
3 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Alison Ehrlich
Conditions
Calcinosis
Interventions
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide (FCO2) Laser, Sodium thiosulfate
First posted
2012-04-06
Last updated
2017-11-29
Results first posted
2017-11-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Physician Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.Change from Visit 2 to Visit 12 (week 20)
Change in dermatomyositis-associated calcinosis of a single lesion by assessing its severity as measured by a difference in Physician Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales. The Visual Analog Scale range is from zero (0) to ten (10). Zero (0) being no evidence of disease activity and ten (10) being extremely active or severe disease activity. A negative percent change indicates improvement in the lesion.
SecondaryChange in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Hardness as Measured by a Difference in Durometer (Rex Durometer Model 1600, Type OO) Measurements.Change from Baseline (Visit 1) at Final Assessment (Visit 12, week 20).
Change in dermatomyositis-associated calcinosis of a single lesion by assessing its hardness as measured by a difference in durometer (Rex durometer Model 1600, Type OO) measurements. The range of a durometer is from 0 to 100. The higher the durometer reading, the harder the lesion. Improvement in the lesion hardness would result in a negative change over time.
SecondaryChange in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Patient Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.Change from Visit 2 to Visit 12 (week 20)
Change in dermatomyositis-associated calcinosis of a single lesion by assessing its severity as measured by a difference in Patient Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales. The scale ranges from zero (0) to ten (10). Zero (0) being no evidence of disease activity and ten (10) being extremely active or severe disease activity. A negative change would indicate improvement in the disease activity. A positive change would indicate worsening of disease activity.
SecondaryChange in Size of Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis Area on Lesions as Measured by a Difference in Plain Film (X-ray) Studies.Change from Visit 2 to Visit 12 (week 20)Change in dermatomyositis-associated calcinosis as measured by a difference in centimeters in plain film (x-ray) studies. X rays were compared between baseline and final assessment for any changes.
SecondaryChange in Patient Functionality and/or Quality of Life.Change from Visit 1 to Visit 12 (week 20)
This will be assessed through the use of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)/Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), Manual Muscle Testing (MMT8), and range of motion evaluations. DLQI index scores range from 0 to 30. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.Change in scores from baseline to final assessment yielding a negative percent change indicate an improvement in DLQI. HAQ scales range from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the greater the disability. Change in scores from baseline to final assessment yielding a negative percent change indicate an improvement in the HAQ. MMT8 testing results in a score between 0 and 150. The higher the score, the more normal the function of the muscle. A positive percent change would indicate an improvement in MMT8 testing results.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Physician Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.Change from Visit 2 to Visit 12 (week 20)percentage changeNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Hardness as Measured by a Difference in Durometer (Rex Durometer Model 1600, Type OO) Measurements.Change from Baseline (Visit 1) at Final Assessment (Visit 12, week 20).
2 subjects were enrolled and each subject has 2 lesions that were followed through the study. Each subject has one area that was marked as treatment lesion and also has an area that was used as a control (no treatment lesion). Overall, there were 2 subjects, 2 treatment lesions and 2 no treatment lesions.
percentage of changeNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Patient Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.Change from Visit 2 to Visit 12 (week 20)Percentage of changeNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Size of Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis Area on Lesions as Measured by a Difference in Plain Film (X-ray) Studies.Change from Visit 2 to Visit 12 (week 20)No change was observed for any lesion.cmMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Patient Functionality and/or Quality of Life.Change from Visit 1 to Visit 12 (week 20)
The arms/groups does not apply to this outcome measure. Lesions were not analyzed in these assessments. Overall Patient functionality and quality of life were evaluated via questionnaires, manual muscle testing, and range of motion evaluations. No changes in range of motion were noted for either subject.
percentage of change from baselineNUMBER

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Physician Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.Treatment LesionSubject 1-38.0percentage change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Physician Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.No Treatment LesionSubject 13.3percentage change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Physician Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.Treatment LesionSubject 2-53.1percentage change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Physician Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.No Treatment LesionSubject 22.0percentage change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Hardness as Measured by a Difference in Durometer (Rex Durometer Model 1600, Type OO) Measurements.Treatment LesionSubject 1-35.8percentage of change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Hardness as Measured by a Difference in Durometer (Rex Durometer Model 1600, Type OO) Measurements.No Treatment LesionSubject 1-18.4percentage of change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Hardness as Measured by a Difference in Durometer (Rex Durometer Model 1600, Type OO) Measurements.Treatment LesionSubject 27.4percentage of change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Hardness as Measured by a Difference in Durometer (Rex Durometer Model 1600, Type OO) Measurements.No Treatment LesionSubject 223.8percentage of change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Patient Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.Treatment LesionSubject 1104.7Percentage of change
Change in Dermatomyositis-associated Calcinosis of a Single Lesion by Assessing Its Severity as Measured by a Difference in Patient Calcinosis Visual Analog Scales.No Treatment LesionSubject 1136.5Percentage of change

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment Lesion33
Overall StudySTARTEDNo Treatment Lesion33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment Lesion22
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNo Treatment Lesion22
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment Lesion11
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNo Treatment Lesion11

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment Lesion03
Total, all-cause mortalityNo Treatment Lesion03
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment Lesion03
Total, other adverse eventsNo Treatment Lesion03
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment Lesion03
Total, serious adverse eventsNo Treatment Lesion03

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Treatment Lesion vs No Treatment Lesion: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Treatment Lesion vs No Treatment Lesion: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01572844

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01572844/registered