ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01575834

Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

NCT01575834, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2018-11-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis. Trials, record NCT01575834. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01575834

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
NCT number
NCT01575834
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
7,180 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Romosozumab, Placebo, Denosumab
First posted
2012-04-12
Last updated
2024-08-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-001456-11
Results first posted
2018-11-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes22

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 Months
New vertebral fractures occurred when there was ≥ 1 grade increase from the previous grade of 0 in any vertebra from T4 to L4 using the Genant semiquantitative scoring method. The Genant semiquantitative scoring method was based on assessment of x-rays according to the following scale: * Grade 0 (Normal) = no fracture; * Grade 1 (Mild) = mild fracture, 20 to 25% reduction in vertebral height (anterior, middle, or posterior); * Grade 2 (Moderate) = moderate fracture, 25 to 40% reduction in anterior, middle, and/or posterior height; * Grade 3 (Severe) = severe fracture, greater than 40% reduction in anterior, middle, and/or posterior height.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 months
New vertebral fractures occurred when there was ≥ 1 grade increase from the previous grade of 0 in any vertebra from T4 to L4 using the Genant semiquantitative scoring method. The Genant semiquantitative scoring method was based on assessment of x-rays according to the following scale: * Grade 0 (Normal) = no fracture; * Grade 1 (Mild) = mild fracture, 20 to 25% reduction in vertebral height (anterior, middle, or posterior); * Grade 2 (Moderate) = moderate fracture, 25 to 40% reduction in anterior, middle, and/or posterior height; * Grade 3 (Severe) = severe fracture, greater than 40% reduction in anterior, middle, and/or posterior height.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 1212 Months
Clinical fractures included clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures (excluding skull, facial, mandible, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, metacarpus, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges) that were associated with signs and/or symptoms indicative of a fracture. Clinical vertebral fractures were included regardless of trauma severity or pathologic fractures; nonvertebral fractures associated with high trauma severity or pathologic fractures were excluded.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 Months
A nonvertebral fracture was defined as a fracture present on a copy of radiographs or other diagnostic images such as computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging confirming the fracture within 14 days of reported fracture image date recorded by the study site, and/or documented in a copy of the radiology report, surgical report, or discharge summary, excluding skull, facial, mandible, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, metacarpus, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges. In addition, fractures associated with high trauma severity or pathologic fractures were excluded.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 Months
A nonvertebral fracture was defined as a fracture present on a copy of radiographs or other diagnostic images such as computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging confirming the fracture within 14 days of reported fracture image date as recorded by the study site, and/or documented in a copy of the radiology report, surgical report, or discharge summary, excluding skull, facial, mandible, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, metacarpus, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges. In addition, fractures associated with high trauma severity or pathologic fractures were excluded.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 2424 Months
Clinical fractures included clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures (excluding skull, facial, mandible, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, metacarpus, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges) that were associated with signs and/or symptoms indicative of a fracture. Clinical vertebral fractures were included regardless of trauma severity or pathologic fractures; nonvertebral fractures associated with high trauma severity or pathologic fractures were excluded.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Major Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 Months
A major nonvertebral fracture was a subset of nonvertebral fractures including pelvis, distal femur (ie, femur excluding hip), proximal tibia (ie, tibia excluding ankle), ribs, proximal humerus (ie, humerus excluding elbow), forearm, and hip.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Major Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 Months
A major nonvertebral fracture was a subset of nonvertebral fractures including pelvis, distal femur (ie, femur excluding hip), proximal tibia (ie, tibia excluding ankle), ribs, proximal humerus (ie, humerus excluding elbow), forearm, and hip.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a New or Worsening Vertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 MonthsA new or worsening vertebral fracture was identified when there was a ≥ 1 grade increase from the previous grade in any vertebra from T4 to L4.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a New or Worsening Vertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 MonthsA new or worsening vertebral fracture was identified when there was a ≥ 1 grade increase from the previous grade in any vertebra from T4 to L4.

Outcomes22

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 Months
Primary efficacy analysis set includes all participants who had a baseline and ≥ 1 postbaseline evaluation of vertebral fracture during the 12 months, including participants with missing baseline Genant scores whose first postbaseline spinal radiograph showed no fracture on the same vertebrae. Last observation carried forward imputation was used.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 months
Primary efficacy analysis set includes all participants who had a baseline and ≥ 1 postbaseline evaluation of vertebral fracture during the 24 months, including participants with missing baseline Genant scores whose first postbaseline spinal radiograph showed no fracture on the same vertebrae. Last observation carried forward imputation was used.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 1212 MonthsFull analysis set; Last observation carried forward imputation (LOCF) was used.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 MonthsFull analysis setpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 MonthsFull analysis setpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 2424 MonthsFull analysis set; LOCF imputation was usedpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Major Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 MonthsFull analysis setpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Major Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 MonthsFull analysis setpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a New or Worsening Vertebral Fracture Through Month 1212 Months
Primary efficacy analysis set includes all participants who had a baseline and ≥ 1 postbaseline evaluation of vertebral fracture during the 24 months, including participants with missing baseline Genant scores whose first postbaseline spinal radiograph showed no fracture on the same vertebrae. LOCF imputation was used
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a New or Worsening Vertebral Fracture Through Month 2424 Months
Primary efficacy analysis set includes all participants who had a baseline and ≥ 1 postbaseline evaluation of vertebral fracture during the 24 months, including participants with missing baseline Genant scores whose first postbaseline spinal radiograph showed no fracture on the same vertebrae. LOCF imputation was used.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group44

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 12Placebo1.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 12Romosozumab0.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 24Placebo/Denosumab2.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 24Romosozumab/Denosumab0.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 12Placebo2.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 12Romosozumab1.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 12Placebo2.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 12Romosozumab1.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 24Placebo/Denosumab3.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 24Romosozumab/Denosumab2.7percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo/Denosumab3,591
Overall StudySTARTEDRomosozumab/Denosumab3,589
Overall StudyReceived Double-blind TreatmentPlacebo/Denosumab3,582
Overall StudyReceived Double-blind TreatmentRomosozumab/Denosumab3,575
Overall StudyCompleted Double-blind PeriodPlacebo/Denosumab3,205
Overall StudyCompleted Double-blind PeriodRomosozumab/Denosumab3,185
Overall StudyCompleted 24-month Study PeriodPlacebo/Denosumab3,032
Overall StudyCompleted 24-month Study PeriodRomosozumab/Denosumab2,994
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo/Denosumab2,892
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRomosozumab/Denosumab2,851

Adverse events3,056

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disorders12-Month Double-blind Period: Placebo1623,576
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disorders12-Month Double-blind Period: Romosozumab1383,581
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disorders36-Month Study Period: Placebo/Denosumab2103,576
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disorders36-Month Study Period: Romosozumab/Denosumab1893,581
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders12-Month Double-blind Period: Placebo1333,576
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders12-Month Double-blind Period: Romosozumab1113,581
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders36-Month Study Period: Placebo/Denosumab1913,576
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders36-Month Study Period: Romosozumab/Denosumab1823,581
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestations12-Month Double-blind Period: Placebo1803,576
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestations12-Month Double-blind Period: Romosozumab1693,581

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality12-Month Double-blind Period: Placebo
Total, all-cause mortality12-Month Double-blind Period: Romosozumab
Total, all-cause mortality36-Month Study Period: Placebo/Denosumab
Total, all-cause mortality36-Month Study Period: Romosozumab/Denosumab
Total, other adverse events12-Month Double-blind Period: Placebo2,0593,576
Total, other adverse events12-Month Double-blind Period: Romosozumab2,0193,581
Total, other adverse events36-Month Study Period: Placebo/Denosumab2,4343,576
Total, other adverse events36-Month Study Period: Romosozumab/Denosumab2,4633,581
Total, serious adverse events12-Month Double-blind Period: Placebo3143,576
Total, serious adverse events12-Month Double-blind Period: Romosozumab3443,581

Papers17

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27641143BACKGROUNDPubMed
29573473BACKGROUNDPubMed
29750828BACKGROUNDPubMed
30508316BACKGROUNDPubMed
31168657BACKGROUNDPubMed
31233639BACKGROUNDPubMed
31707465BACKGROUNDPubMed
33057807BACKGROUNDPubMed
33537844BACKGROUNDPubMed
34633116BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 17

See all 17 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01575834

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01575834/registered?page=2