ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01582854

Efficacy and Safety of Actovegin in Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment (PSCI)

NCT01582854, Phase 3, Completed, Takeda; results first posted 2016-02-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Actovegin in Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment (PSCI). Trials, record NCT01582854. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01582854

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Actovegin in Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment (PSCI)
NCT number
NCT01582854
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
503 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Conditions
Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment (PSCI)
Interventions
Actovegin, Placebo
First posted
2012-04-23
Last updated
2016-02-22
Results first posted
2016-02-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale + Cognitive Subscale Extended Version (ADAS-cog+) at Month 6Baseline and Month 6
The ADAS-cog measures cognitive performance by combining the ratings of 11 items. The cognitive domains mainly addressed by ADAS-cog are: memory (short term), language, ability to orientate (reflects memory), construction/planning of simple designs and performance. The extended version of the ADAS-cog (ADAS-cog+) includes 3 additional items: a 2-number cancellation task to test for attention, a delayed recall task to test for memory consolidation and a maze test for executive performance. Each item is scored and then the item scores are totaled. Total scores range from 0 (best) to 90 (worst). Higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for analyses that included treatment, pooled centre, and their interaction as factors and Baseline ADAS-cog+ score as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ at Month 3 and Month 12Baseline and Months 3 and 12
The ADAS-cog measures cognitive performance by combining the ratings of 11 items. The cognitive domains mainly addressed by ADAS-cog are: memory (short term), language, ability to orientate (reflects memory), construction/planning of simple designs and performance. The extended version of the ADAS-cog (ADAS-cog+) includes 3 additional items: a 2-number cancellation task to test for attention, a delayed recall task to test for memory consolidation and a maze test for executive performance. Each item is scored and then the item scores are totaled. Total scores range from 0 (best) to 90 (worst). Higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANCOVA model was used for analyses that included treatment, pooled centre, and their interaction as factors and Baseline ADAS-cog+ score as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12Baseline, End of Infusion and Months 3, 6 and 12
The MoCA is a rapid screening test to assess mild cognitive impairment. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes. The total possible score is 0 to 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal. A positive change from Baseline (BL) indicates improvement. ANCOVA model was used for analyses that included treatment and pooled centres as factors, plus years of education and baseline MoCA score as covariates.
SecondaryPercentage of ADAS-cog+ Responders at Time Points 3, 6 and 12 MonthsBaseline and Months 3, 6 and 12Responder was defined as an improvement of 4 or more from baseline on the ADAS-cog+ scale using observed data. The proportion of responders was compared between treatments using a chi-square test.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Diagnosis of DementiaMonth 6
Diagnosis of dementia will be evaluated after 6 and 12 months classified according to International Statistical Classification of Diseases and related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) \[Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders, Diagnostic Criteria for Research\]. The proportion of participants with dementia was compared between treatments using a Fisher's exact test.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12Baseline and End of Infusion and Months 3, 6 and 12
The NIHSS is a tool to objectively quantify the impairment caused by a stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 (normal) to 4 (some level of impairment). The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate total possible NIHSS score from 0 (best) to 42 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANCOVA model was used for analyses that included treatment and pooled centre as factors and Baseline NIHSS score as a covariate.
SecondaryBarthel Index at Months 3 and 6Months 3 and 6
The Barthel Index consists of 10 items that measure a person's daily functioning, specifically the activities of daily living and mobility. The items include: feeding, transfers (bed to chair and back), grooming, toilet use, bathing, mobility (walking on level surface), going up and down stairs, dressing, continence of bowels and bladder. Each performance item is rated, with a given number of points assigned to each level or ranking. Individual scores are summed for a total possible scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) with higher scores indicating more independent daily living.
SecondaryEuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D) at Month 6Month 6
EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status consisting of 5 dimensions: mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The participant rates their level of function in each area using a 5 point scale where 1=no problems (best) to 5=extreme problems (worst). The percentage of participants in each category is reported.
SecondaryEuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D) at Month 12Month 12
EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status consisting of 5 dimensions: mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The participant rates their level of function in each area using a 5 point scale where 1=no problems (best) to 5=extreme problems (worst). The percentage of participants in each category is reported.
SecondaryEuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D) General Health at Months 6 and 12Months 6 and 12
The EuroQoL included a visual analogue scale where the subject marks how they feel at that moment on a scale from 0 (the worst health that can be imagined) to 100 (the best health that can be imagined).

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale + Cognitive Subscale Extended Version (ADAS-cog+) at Month 6Baseline and Month 6
Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing individual item scores (where only some item scores missing) imputed with worst possible score and missing total scores (where all item scores missing) imputed by last observation carried forward.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ at Month 3 and Month 12Baseline and Months 3 and 12
Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing individual item scores (where only some item scores missing) imputed with worst possible score.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12Baseline, End of Infusion and Months 3, 6 and 12Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of ADAS-cog+ Responders at Time Points 3, 6 and 12 MonthsBaseline and Months 3, 6 and 12Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Diagnosis of DementiaMonth 6Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12Baseline and End of Infusion and Months 3, 6 and 12Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYBarthel Index at Months 3 and 6Months 3 and 6Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.score on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYEuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D) at Month 6Month 6Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D) at Month 12Month 12Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D) General Health at Months 6 and 12Months 6 and 12Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analyses at the given time-point.score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group150

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale + Cognitive Subscale Extended Version (ADAS-cog+) at Month 6Actovegin-6.8Standard Error 0.58score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale + Cognitive Subscale Extended Version (ADAS-cog+) at Month 6Placebo-4.6Standard Error 0.58score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ at Month 3 and Month 12ActoveginChange from Baseline at Month 3 (n=224, 234)-5.4Standard Error 0.53score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ at Month 3 and Month 12PlaceboChange from Baseline at Month 3 (n=224, 234)-4.3Standard Error 0.52score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ at Month 3 and Month 12ActoveginChange from Baseline at Month 12 (n=211, 219)-8.2Standard Error 0.66score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ at Month 3 and Month 12PlaceboChange from Baseline at Month 12 (n=211, 219)-4.5Standard Error 0.66score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12ActoveginChange from BL at End of Infusion (n=242, 247)2.1Standard Error 0.15score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12PlaceboChange from BL at End of Infusion (n=242, 247)1.8Standard Error 0.15score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12ActoveginChange from Baseline at Month 3 (n=224, 234)3.4Standard Error 0.20score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) at End of Infusion Period, Months 3, 6 and 12PlaceboChange from Baseline at Month 3 (n=224, 234)2.7Standard Error 0.20score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDActovegin248
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo255
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActovegin212
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo221
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDActovegin36
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo34

Adverse events68

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersActovegin5250
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersPlacebo3253
otherRespiratory tract infection viralInfections and infestationsActovegin5250
otherRespiratory tract infection viralInfections and infestationsPlacebo8253
otherDyslipidaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersActovegin8250
otherDyslipidaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo2253
otherAmnesiaNervous system disordersActovegin0250
otherAmnesiaNervous system disordersPlacebo7253
otherDementiaNervous system disordersActovegin5250
otherDementiaNervous system disordersPlacebo9253

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityActovegin
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsActovegin31250
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo31253
Total, serious adverse eventsActovegin22250
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo17253

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
28432265DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Actovegin vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Cancellation TestPrimary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01582854

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01582854/results?page=2