Trial · NCT01603602
BOTOX® Treatment in Pediatric Upper Limb Spasticity
NCT01603602, Phase 3, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2018-08-14
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. BOTOX® Treatment in Pediatric Upper Limb Spasticity. Trials, record NCT01603602. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01603602
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- BOTOX® Treatment in Pediatric Upper Limb Spasticity
- NCT number
- NCT01603602
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 235 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Conditions
- Pediatrics, Muscle Spasticity, Cerebral Palsy, Stroke
- Interventions
- botulinum toxin Type A, Normal Saline (Placebo)
- First posted
- 2012-05-22
- Last updated
- 2018-08-14
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2012-000062-38
- Results first posted
- 2018-08-14
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes5
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Score of the Principal Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4 and 6 | The MAS-B was used to evaluate spasticity based on grading the resistance encountered in the principal muscle group (elbow and wrist) by means of passively moving a limb through its range of motion at a study specified velocity. The resistance encountered to passive stretch was graded using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone (best) to 4=affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension (worst). For analysis purposes, the MAS-B was recoded as follows: 0=1, 1=1, 1+=2, 2=3, 3=4, 4=5. The scores at Weeks 4 and 6 were averaged. A Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model was used for analysis. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Primary | Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6 | Weeks 4 and 6 | The CGI of overall change (improvement or worsening) was assessed by the physician considering the participant's clinical condition and severity of side effects using a 9-point scale where: -4=very marked worsening to +4=very marked improvement. The scores at Weeks 4 and 6 were averaged. A MMRM model was used for analysis. |
| Secondary | Average Change From Baseline in MAS-B Score of the Finger Flexor Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4 and 6 | The MAS-B was used to evaluate spasticity based on grading the resistance encountered in the finger flexor muscle group by means of passively moving a limb through its range of motion at a study specified velocity. The resistance encountered to passive stretch was graded using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone (best) to 4=affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension (worst). For analysis purposes, the MAS-B was recoded as follows: 0=1, 1=1, 1+=2, 2=3, 3=4, 4=5. The scores at Weeks 4 and 6 were averaged. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for analysis. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Secondary | Goal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point Scale | Week 8 and 12 | Two functional goals, one active and one passive, were selected by the participant and family in consultation with the physician investigator and/or treating physical therapist relative to the lower limb impairment due to spasticity. The physician assessed the achievement of the goals using a 6-point scale: where -3=worse than start to +2=much more than expected: improvements clearly exceed the defined therapeutic goal. An ANCOVA model was used for analysis. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Severity of Spasticity of the Principal Muscle Group (R2-R1) Calculated Using the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6 | The MTS measured the difference between slow and fast range of motion (R2-R1) and respective change from baseline to each posttreatment office visit. The MTS of the ankle was used to determine the passive range of movement at different movement velocities, V1 (as slow as possible) and V3 (as fast as possible) with the relative difference between a slow and a fast velocity passive stretch determining the dynamic component of the muscle contracture for the joint. At each visit, the investigator measured 2 joint angles by goniometer: the R1 angle which is the angle of catch after a fast velocity (V3) stretch and the R2 angle defined as the passive joint range of movement following a slow velocity (V1) stretch. The R2 - R1 value indicated the level of the dynamic component of spasticity in the joint. The difference between slow (R2) and fast (R1) range of motion and respective change from baseline to each posttreatment office visit on the MTS was derived. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes5
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Score of the Principal Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4 and 6 | Participants from the Modified Intent-to treat (mITT) population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline score and at least one post-baseline measurement at weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the principal muscle group and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| PRIMARY | Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6 | Weeks 4 and 6 | Participants from the m ITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline score and at least one post-baseline measurement at weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the principal muscle group and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis at the given time-point. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Average Change From Baseline in MAS-B Score of the Finger Flexor Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4 and 6 | Participants from the mITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline score and at least one post-baseline measurement at weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the principal muscle group and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis at the given time-point. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Goal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point Scale | Week 8 and 12 | Participants from the mITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline score and at least one post-baseline measurement at weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the principal muscle group and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis at the given time-point. | score on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Severity of Spasticity of the Principal Muscle Group (R2-R1) Calculated Using the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6 | Participants from the mITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline score and at least one post-baseline measurement at weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the principal muscle group and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis at the given time-point. | degrees | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group51
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Score of the Principal Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | -1.87 | Standard Error 0.102 | score on a scale | |
| Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Score of the Principal Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | -1.92 | Standard Error 0.101 | score on a scale | |
| Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Score of the Principal Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | Placebo | -1.21 | Standard Error 0.102 | score on a scale | |
| Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6 | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 1.87 | Standard Error 0.108 | score on a scale | |
| Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6 | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 1.88 | Standard Error 0.108 | score on a scale | |
| Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6 | Placebo | 1.66 | Standard Error 0.108 | score on a scale | |
| Average Change From Baseline in MAS-B Score of the Finger Flexor Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | -1.41 | Standard Error 0.184 | score on a scale | |
| Average Change From Baseline in MAS-B Score of the Finger Flexor Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | -1.46 | Standard Error 0.169 | score on a scale | |
| Average Change From Baseline in MAS-B Score of the Finger Flexor Muscle Group at Weeks 4 and 6 | Placebo | -1.02 | Standard Error 0.170 | score on a scale | |
| Goal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point Scale | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | Week 8, Active Goal | 0.11 | Standard Error 0.148 | score on a scale |
1 to 10 of 51Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 51 results by groupParticipant flow9
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 77 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 78 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo | 80 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 75 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 78 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo | 79 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 2 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 0 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo | 1 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events36
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 7 | 77 | |
| other | Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 4 | 78 | |
| other | Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 2 | 79 | |
| other | Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 6 | 77 | |
| other | Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 4 | 78 | |
| other | Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 5 | 79 | |
| other | Pyrexia | General disorders | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 2 | 77 | |
| other | Pyrexia | General disorders | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 3 | 78 | |
| other | Pyrexia | General disorders | Placebo | 5 | 79 | |
| other | Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 2 | 77 |
1 to 10 of 36Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 36 adverse eventsAdverse event totals9
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 0 | 77 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 0 | 78 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | 0 | 79 |
| Total, other adverse events | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 15 | 77 |
| Total, other adverse events | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 12 | 78 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 17 | 79 |
| Total, serious adverse events | BOTOX® 6 U/kg | 3 | 77 |
| Total, serious adverse events | BOTOX® 3 U/kg | 1 | 78 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo | 1 | 79 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01603602
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01603602/results?page=2