ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01603628

BOTOX® Treatment in Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity

NCT01603628, Phase 3, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2018-08-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. BOTOX® Treatment in Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity. Trials, record NCT01603628. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01603628

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
BOTOX® Treatment in Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity
NCT number
NCT01603628
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
384 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Pediatrics, Muscle Spasticity, Cerebral Palsy
Interventions
botulinum toxin Type A, Normal Saline (Placebo)
First posted
2012-05-22
Last updated
2018-08-14
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-000042-35
Results first posted
2018-08-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAverage Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Ankle Score With Knee Extended at Weeks 4 and 6Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4 and 6
The MAS-B was used to evaluate spasticity based on grading the resistance encountered in the principal muscle group (elbow and wrist) by means of passively moving a limb through its range of motion at a study specified velocity. The resistance encountered to passive stretch was graded using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone (best) to 4=affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension (worst). For analysis purposes, the MAS-B was recoded as follows: 0=1, 1=1, 1+=2, 2=3, 3=4, 4=5. The scores at Weeks 4 and 6 were averaged. A Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model was used for analysis. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
PrimaryAverage Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6Weeks 4 and 6
The CGI of overall change (improvement or worsening) was assessed by the physician considering the participant's clinical condition and severity of side effects using a 9-point scale where: -4=very marked worsening to +4=very marked improvement. The scores at Weeks 4 and 6 were averaged. A Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model was used for analysis.
SecondaryGoal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point ScaleWeeks 8 and 12
Two functional goals, one active and one passive, were selected by the participant and family in consultation with the physician investigator and/or treating physical therapist relative to the lower limb impairment due to spasticity. The physician assessed the achievement of the goals using a 6-point scale: where -3=worse than start to +2=much more than expected: improvements clearly exceed the defined therapeutic goal. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Severity of Spasticity of the Ankle With Knee Extended and Knee Flexed (R2-R1) Calculated Using the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
The MTS measured the difference between slow and fast range of motion (R2-R1) and respective change from baseline to each posttreatment office visit. The MTS of the ankle was used to determine the passive range of movement at different movement velocities, V1 (as slow as possible) and V3 (as fast as possible) with the relative difference between a slow and fast velocity passive stretch determining the dynamic component of the muscle contracture for the joint. The investigator measured 2 joint angles by goniometer: the R1 angle which is the angle of catch after a fast velocity (V3) stretch and the R2 angle defined as the passive joint range of movement following a slow velocity (V1) stretch. The R2-R1 value indicated the level of the dynamic component of spasticity in the joint. The difference between R2 and R1 range of motion and respective change from baseline to each posttreatment office visit on the MTS was derived. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for analysis.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAverage Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Ankle Score With Knee Extended at Weeks 4 and 6Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4 and 6
Participants from the mITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline ankle score with knee extended and at least one post-baseline measurement at Weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the ankle score with knee extended and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYAverage Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6Weeks 4 and 6
Participants from the mITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline ankle score with knee extended and at least one post-baseline measurement at Weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the ankle score with knee extended and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYGoal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point ScaleWeeks 8 and 12
Participants from the mITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline ankle score with knee extended and at least one post-baseline measurement at Weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the ankle score with knee extended and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Severity of Spasticity of the Ankle With Knee Extended and Knee Flexed (R2-R1) Calculated Using the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Participants from the mITT population, all randomized participants with a valid MAS-B baseline ankle score with knee extended and at least one post-baseline measurement at Weeks 2, 4, or 6 for the MAS-B of the ankle score with knee extended and the CGI by physician, with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
degreesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group33

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Ankle Score With Knee Extended at Weeks 4 and 6BOTOX® 8 U/kg-1.06Standard Error 0.071score on a scale
Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Ankle Score With Knee Extended at Weeks 4 and 6BOTOX® 4 U/kg-1.01Standard Error 0.072score on a scale
Average Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale-Bohannon (MAS-B) Ankle Score With Knee Extended at Weeks 4 and 6Placebo-0.80Standard Error 0.071score on a scale
Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6BOTOX® 8 U/kg1.65Standard Error 0.090score on a scale
Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6BOTOX® 4 U/kg1.49Standard Error 0.091score on a scale
Average Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Overall Change by Physician at Weeks 4 and 6Placebo1.36Standard Error 0.089score on a scale
Goal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point ScaleBOTOX® 8 U/kgWeek 8, Active Goal0.10Standard Error 0.108score on a scale
Goal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point ScaleBOTOX® 4 U/kgWeek 8, Active Goal-0.03Standard Error 0.108score on a scale
Goal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point ScalePlaceboWeek 8, Active Goal-0.31Standard Error 0.105score on a scale
Goal Attainment Score (GAS) as Assessed by Physician Using a 6-Point ScaleBOTOX® 8 U/kgWeek 8, Passive Goal0.19Standard Error 0.115score on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBOTOX® 8 U/kg128
Overall StudySTARTEDBOTOX® 4 U/kg126
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo130
Overall StudySafety Population: Received TreatmentBOTOX® 8 U/kg128
Overall StudySafety Population: Received TreatmentBOTOX® 4 U/kg126
Overall StudySafety Population: Received TreatmentPlacebo128
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBOTOX® 8 U/kg125
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBOTOX® 4 U/kg123
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo128
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBOTOX® 8 U/kg3

Adverse events27

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersBOTOX® 8 U/kg5128
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersBOTOX® 4 U/kg8126
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPlacebo7128
otherViral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsBOTOX® 8 U/kg12128
otherViral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsBOTOX® 4 U/kg14126
otherViral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo22128
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsBOTOX® 8 U/kg8128
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsBOTOX® 4 U/kg10126
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo9128
seriousExtrasystolesCardiac disordersBOTOX® 8 U/kg0128

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBOTOX® 8 U/kg0128
Total, all-cause mortalityBOTOX® 4 U/kg0126
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0128
Total, other adverse eventsBOTOX® 8 U/kg24128
Total, other adverse eventsBOTOX® 4 U/kg26126
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo35128
Total, serious adverse eventsBOTOX® 8 U/kg0128
Total, serious adverse eventsBOTOX® 4 U/kg3126
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo4128

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01603628

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01603628/results?page=2