ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01619176

Acupuncture Study on Rheumatoid Arthritis, Monitoring Microbiome and Blood

NCT01619176, Not applicable, Completed, Chinese Academy of Sciences; results first posted 2023-09-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Acupuncture Study on Rheumatoid Arthritis, Monitoring Microbiome and Blood. Trials, record NCT01619176. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01619176

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Acupuncture Study on Rheumatoid Arthritis, Monitoring Microbiome and Blood
NCT number
NCT01619176
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
10 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), leflunomide, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), leflunomide, Acupuncture
First posted
2012-06-14
Last updated
2023-11-13
Results first posted
2023-09-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryACR20 Response Rate at 3 WeeksFrom baseline to 3 weeks
ACR criteria stands for: American College of Rheumatology Criteria. ACR criteria measures improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in three of the following five parameters: acute phase reactant (such as sedimentation rate) patient assessment physician assessment pain scale disability/functional questionnaire The number indicates the percentage of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well percentage improvement in three of the other five criteria (patient's assessment of pain, a physician's global assessment of disease, a patient's global assessment of disease, physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the level of acute-phase reactant)
PrimaryACR20 Response Rate at 3 MonthsFrom baseline to three months
ACR criteria stands for: American College of Rheumatology Criteria. ACR criteria measures improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in three of the following five parameters: acute phase reactant (such as sedimentation rate) patient assessment physician assessment pain scale disability/functional questionnaire The number indicates the percentage of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well percentage improvement in three of the other five criteria (patient's assessment of pain, a physician's global assessment of disease, a patient's global assessment of disease, physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the level of acute-phase reactant)
SecondaryACR50 Response Rate at 3 WeeksFrom baseline to 3 weeks
ACR criteria stands for: American College of Rheumatology Criteria. ACR criteria measures improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in three of the following five parameters: acute phase reactant (such as sedimentation rate) patient assessment physician assessment pain scale disability/functional questionnaire The number indicates the percentage of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well percentage improvement in three of the other five criteria (patient's assessment of pain, a physician's global assessment of disease, a patient's global assessment of disease, physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the level of acute-phase reactant)
SecondaryACR50 Response Rate at 3 MonthsFrom baseline to three months
ACR criteria stands for: American College of Rheumatology Criteria. ACR criteria measures improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in three of the following five parameters: acute phase reactant (such as sedimentation rate) patient assessment physician assessment pain scale disability/functional questionnaire The number indicates the percentage of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well percentage improvement in three of the other five criteria (patient's assessment of pain, a physician's global assessment of disease, a patient's global assessment of disease, physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the level of acute-phase reactant)
SecondaryACR70 Response Rate at 3 WeeksFrom baseline to 3 weeks
ACR criteria stands for: American College of Rheumatology Criteria. ACR criteria measures improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in three of the following five parameters: acute phase reactant (such as sedimentation rate) patient assessment physician assessment pain scale disability/functional questionnaire The number indicates the percentage of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well percentage improvement in three of the other five criteria (patient's assessment of pain, a physician's global assessment of disease, a patient's global assessment of disease, physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the level of acute-phase reactant)
SecondaryACR70 Response Rate at 3 MonthsFrom baseline to three months
ACR criteria stands for: American College of Rheumatology Criteria. ACR criteria measures improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in three of the following five parameters: acute phase reactant (such as sedimentation rate) patient assessment physician assessment pain scale disability/functional questionnaire The number indicates the percentage of improvement in tender or swollen joint counts as well percentage improvement in three of the other five criteria (patient's assessment of pain, a physician's global assessment of disease, a patient's global assessment of disease, physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the level of acute-phase reactant)
SecondaryDAS28 at BaselineAt baseline
The DAS28 (disease activity score) considers 28 tender and swollen joint counts, general health (GH; patient assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 = best, 100 = worst), plus levels of an acute phase reactant (either the level of erythrocyte sedimentation rate ESR (mm/h) or C-reactive protein CRP (mg/litre)). DAS28 values were calculated as follows: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56\*√(TJC28) +0.28\*√(SJC28)+0.014\*GH+0.36\*ln(CRP+1)+0.96; DAS28 (ESR) = 0.56\*√(TJC28)+0.28\*√(SJC28)+0.014\*GH+0.70\*ln(ESR), where TJC = tender joint count and SJC = swollen joint count. The scale does not have bounds. DAS28 total score \< 2,6 means remission DAS28 total score ranged between 2.6-3.2 means inactive disease; DAS28 total score ranged between 3.3-5.1 means moderate disease activity; DAS28 total score \>5.1 means very active disease
SecondaryDAS28 at 3 WeeksAt 3 weeks
The DAS28 (disease activity score) considers 28 tender and swollen joint counts, general health (GH; patient assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 = best, 100 = worst), plus levels of an acute phase reactant (either the level of erythrocyte sedimentation rate ESR (mm/h) or C-reactive protein CRP (mg/litre)). DAS28 values were calculated as follows: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56\*√(TJC28) +0.28\*√(SJC28)+0.014\*GH+0.36\*ln(CRP+1)+0.96; DAS28 (ESR) = 0.56\*√(TJC28)+0.28\*√(SJC28)+0.014\*GH+0.70\*ln(ESR), where TJC = tender joint count and SJC = swollen joint count. The scale does not have bounds. DAS28 total score \< 2,6 means remission DAS28 total score ranged between 0-3.2 means inactive disease; DAS28 total score ranged between 3.3-5.1 means moderate disease activity; DAS28 total score \>5.1 means very active disease
SecondaryDAS28 at 3 MonthsAt 3 months
The DAS28 (disease activity score) considers 28 tender and swollen joint counts, general health (GH; patient assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 = best, 100 = worst), plus levels of an acute phase reactant (either the level of erythrocyte sedimentation rate ESR (mm/h) or C-reactive protein CRP (mg/litre)). DAS28 values were calculated as follows: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56\*√(TJC28) +0.28\*√(SJC28)+0.014\*GH+0.36\*ln(CRP+1)+0.96; DAS28 (ESR) = 0.56\*√(TJC28)+0.28\*√(SJC28)+0.014\*GH+0.70\*ln(ESR), where TJC = tender joint count and SJC = swollen joint count. The scale does not have bounds. DAS28 total score \< 2,6 means remission DAS28 total score ranged between 0-3.2 means inactive disease; DAS28 total score ranged between 3.3-5.1 means moderate disease activity; DAS28 total score \>5.1 means very active disease

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYACR20 Response Rate at 3 WeeksFrom baseline to 3 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYACR20 Response Rate at 3 MonthsFrom baseline to three monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYACR50 Response Rate at 3 WeeksFrom baseline to 3 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYACR50 Response Rate at 3 MonthsFrom baseline to three monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYACR70 Response Rate at 3 WeeksFrom baseline to 3 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYACR70 Response Rate at 3 MonthsFrom baseline to three monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDAS28 at BaselineAt baselineunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDAS28 at 3 WeeksAt 3 weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDAS28 at 3 MonthsAt 3 monthsunits on a scaleMEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
ACR20 Response Rate at 3 WeeksAcupuncture0Participants
ACR20 Response Rate at 3 WeeksControl1Participants
ACR20 Response Rate at 3 MonthsAcupuncture5Participants
ACR20 Response Rate at 3 MonthsControl3Participants
ACR50 Response Rate at 3 WeeksAcupuncture0Participants
ACR50 Response Rate at 3 WeeksControl1Participants
ACR50 Response Rate at 3 MonthsAcupuncture2Participants
ACR50 Response Rate at 3 MonthsControl1Participants
ACR70 Response Rate at 3 WeeksAcupuncture0Participants
ACR70 Response Rate at 3 WeeksControl0Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAcupuncture6
Overall StudySTARTEDControl4
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAcupuncture6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAcupuncture0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAcupuncture
Total, all-cause mortalityControl
Total, other adverse eventsAcupuncture06
Total, other adverse eventsControl04
Total, serious adverse eventsAcupuncture06
Total, serious adverse eventsControl04

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons7

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Acupuncture vs Control: ACR70 Response Rate at 3 WeeksTrial comparisons
Acupuncture vs Control: ACR50 Response Rate at 3 WeeksTrial comparisons
Acupuncture vs Control: ACR20 Response Rate at 3 WeeksTrial comparisons
Acupuncture vs Control: ACR50 Response Rate at 3 MonthsTrial comparisons
Acupuncture vs Control: ACR70 Response Rate at 3 MonthsTrial comparisons
Acupuncture vs Control: ACR20 Response Rate at 3 MonthsTrial comparisons
Acupuncture vs Control: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01619176

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01619176/registered