ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01627249

Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT01627249, Phase 3, Completed, Jaeb Center for Health Research; results first posted 2015-12-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. Trials, record NCT01627249. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01627249

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT number
NCT01627249
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
660 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Conditions
Diabetic Macular Edema
Interventions
2.0 mg intravitreal aflibercept, 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab, 0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab
First posted
2012-06-25
Last updated
2020-08-10
Results first posted
2015-12-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-yearBaseline to 1-yearVisual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
PrimaryChange in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69Baseline to 1-yearVisual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
PrimaryChange in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69Baseline to 1-yearVisual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
SecondaryOverall Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thicknessbaseline to 1-year
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69baseline to 1-year
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
SecondaryChange in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69baseline to 1-year
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
SecondaryOverall Change in Retinal VolumeBaseline to 1-year
Baseline volume values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 459 scans. One-year volume values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 472 scans. When calculating change in volume, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, because the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in volume was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 17 eyes.
SecondaryTotal Number of Injections Prior to 1 YearBaseline to 1-yearOnly includes participants that completed the 1 year visit
SecondaryTotal Number of Laser Treatmentsbetween 24 weeks and 1 yearOnly includes participants that completed the 1 year visit.
SecondaryEyes Receiving 1 or More Alternative Treatments for DME Other Than LaserBaseline to 1-year

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-yearBaseline to 1-year
Visual acuity change truncated to +/- 3SD (-22 and +44) to minimize the effects of outliers for 6 eyes in the aflibercept group (4 on the positive end, 2 on the negative end) and 2 eyes in the bevacizumab group (both on the negative end).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYOverall Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thicknessbaseline to 1-year
In addition to participants missing the 1-year visit, 3 in the aflibercept group, 3 in the bevacizumab group, and 5 in the ranibizumab group had 1-year visits but unusable OCT data to compute change due to the scan being missing or ungradable at either baseline or 1 year.
micronsMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69Baseline to 1-year
Visual acuity change truncated to +/- 3SD (-22 and +44) to minimize the effects of outliers for 6 eyes in the aflibercept group (4 on the positive end, 2 on the negative end) and 2 eyes in the bevacizumab group (both on the negative end).
units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69Baseline to 1-year
Visual acuity change truncated to +/- 3SD (-22 and +44) to minimize the effects of outliers for 6 eyes in the aflibercept group (4 on the positive end, 2 on the negative end) and 2 eyes in the bevacizumab group (both on the negative end).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69baseline to 1-year
In addition to participants missing the 1-year visit, 3 in the aflibercept group, 3 in the bevacizumab group, and 5 in the ranibizumab group had 1-year visits but unusable OCT data to compute change due to the scan being missing or ungradable at either baseline or 1 year.
micronsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69baseline to 1-year
In addition to participants missing the 1-year visit, 3 in the aflibercept group, 3 in the bevacizumab group, and 5 in the ranibizumab group had 1-year visits but unusable OCT data to compute change due to the scan being missing or ungradable at either baseline or 1 year.
micronsMEAN
SECONDARYOverall Change in Retinal VolumeBaseline to 1-year
In addition to participants missing the 1-year visit, 46 in the aflibercept group, 53 in the bevacizumab group, and 44 in the ranibizumab group had 1-year visits but unusable OCT data to compute change due to the scan being missing or ungradable at either baseline or 1 year.
mm^3MEAN
SECONDARYTotal Number of Injections Prior to 1 YearBaseline to 1-yearSeven study eyes received 1 injection and 2 eyes received 2 injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab prior to the FDA approving a 0.3 mg dosage of ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema treatment.InjectionsMEAN
SECONDARYTotal Number of Laser Treatmentsbetween 24 weeks and 1 yearparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEyes Receiving 1 or More Alternative Treatments for DME Other Than LaserBaseline to 1-yearEyesNUMBER

Results by group36

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-yearAflibercept13.3Standard Deviation 11.1units on a scale
Overall Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-yearBevacizumab9.7Standard Deviation 10.1units on a scale
Overall Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-yearRanibizumab11.2Standard Deviation 9.4units on a scale
Overall Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield ThicknessAflibercept-169Standard Deviation 138microns
Overall Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield ThicknessBevacizumab-101Standard Deviation 121microns
Overall Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield ThicknessRanibizumab-147Standard Deviation 137microns
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69Aflibercept18.9Standard Deviation 11.5units on a scale
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69Bevacizumab11.8Standard Deviation 12.0units on a scale
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69Ranibizumab14.2Standard Deviation 10.6units on a scale
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69Aflibercept8.0Standard Deviation 7.6units on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAflibercept224
Overall StudySTARTEDBevacizumab218
Overall StudySTARTEDRanibizumab218
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAflibercept208
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBevacizumab206
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRanibizumab206
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAflibercept16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBevacizumab12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRanibizumab12

Adverse events489

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCataractEye disordersAflibercept1422417
otherCataractEye disordersBevacizumab1121814
otherCataractEye disordersRanibizumab1421816
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersAflibercept3022467
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersBevacizumab4221883
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersRanibizumab2521855
otherDry eyeEye disordersAflibercept1422423
otherDry eyeEye disordersBevacizumab921815
otherDry eyeEye disordersRanibizumab1321818
otherEye irritationEye disordersAflibercept1322428

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAflibercept
Total, all-cause mortalityBevacizumab
Total, all-cause mortalityRanibizumab
Total, other adverse eventsAflibercept152224
Total, other adverse eventsBevacizumab151218
Total, other adverse eventsRanibizumab144218
Total, serious adverse eventsAflibercept61224
Total, serious adverse eventsBevacizumab46218
Total, serious adverse eventsRanibizumab57218

Papers22

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25692915RESULTPubMed
26087135BACKGROUNDPubMed
26222565BACKGROUNDPubMed
26605836BACKGROUNDPubMed
26935357BACKGROUNDPubMed
27280850BACKGROUNDPubMed
27711918BACKGROUNDPubMed
27993277BACKGROUNDPubMed
28152135BACKGROUNDPubMed
28219510BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 22

See all 22 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01627249

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01627249/results?page=2