ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01638000

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Patients With Overactive Bladder Who Were Previously Treated With Another Medicine But Were Not Satisfied With That Treatment.

NCT01638000, Phase 3, Completed, Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.; results first posted 2016-08-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Patients With Overactive Bladder Who Were Previously Treated With Another Medicine But Were Not Satisfied With That Treatment. Trials, record NCT01638000. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01638000

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Patients With Overactive Bladder Who Were Previously Treated With Another Medicine But Were Not Satisfied With That Treatment.
NCT number
NCT01638000
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,887 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
Conditions
Urologic Diseases, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Bladder Diseases
Interventions
Mirabegron, Solifenacin succinate
First posted
2012-07-11
Last updated
2024-11-21
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2011-005713-37
Results first posted
2016-08-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes47

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Final Visit in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
A micturition is any voluntary urination (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodFrom first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 16 weeks)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE; defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a study drug) that started or worsened in the period from the first double-blind medication intake until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake. The following TEAEs were selected for inclusion in the analysis: Dry mouth (aptyalism, dry mouth, dry throat), constipation (constipation), blurred vision (vision blurred, myopia, refraction disorder, accommodation disorder).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
SecondaryNumber of Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final VisitWeek 4, Week 8, Week 12
An incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine. The total number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
An incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
SecondaryNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final VisitWeek 4, Week 8, Week 12
An urgency incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency. The total number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
An urgency incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
An urgency episode is a sudden compelling desire to pass urine immediately followed by an incontinent event or the patient having to rush to the toilet and make it in time; severity recorded as 3 (severe urgency) or 4 (urgency incontinence) on the Patient Perception of the Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) validated scale. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Urgency level was rated by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period using the PPIUS 5-point categorical scale: 0. No urgency; 1. Mild urgency; 2. Moderate urgency; 3. Severe urgency; 4. Urgency incontinence.
SecondaryNumber of Pads Used at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final VisitWeek 4, Week 8, Week 12The total number of pads per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Outcomes47

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Final Visit in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Per Protocol Set (PPS) - all randomized participants who took ≥1 dose of double-blind study drug and who recorded ≥1 micturition in the baseline diary and ≥1 micturition in a post-baseline diary who had completed the study with no major protocol violations which could impact the primary endpoint. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used.
micturitionsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodFrom first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 16 weeks)SAF populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - consisted of all randomized participants who took ≥ 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who recorded ≥1 micturition measurement in the baseline diary and ≥1 micturition measurement in a post-baseline diary. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
micturitionsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final VisitWeek 4, Week 8, Week 12
FAS-Incontinence (FAS-I) - consisted of all FAS participants with ≥1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for final visit only. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
incontinence episodesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12FAS-I population. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.incontinence episodesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final VisitWeek 4, Week 8, Week 12
FAS-I population. LOCF was used for final visit only. Only participants with at least one urgency incontinence episode at baseline were included in the analysis. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
urgency incontinence episodesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12FAS-I population. Only participants with at least one urgency incontinence episode at baseline were included in the analysis. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.urgency incontinence episodesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
FAS population. LOCF was used for final visit only. Only participants with at least one urgency episode (grade 3 or 4) at baseline were included in this analysis. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
urgency episodesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyBaseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12FAS population. LOCF was used in final visit only. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Pads Used at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final VisitWeek 4, Week 8, Week 12
FAS population. LOCF was used in final visit only. Only participants with at least one pad used at baseline were included in this analysis. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
padsMEAN

Results by group1,626

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursMirabegron 50 mg-2.95Standard Error 0.087micturitions
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursSolifenacin 5 mg-3.13Standard Error 0.088micturitions
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodMirabegron 50 mgOverall5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodSolifenacin 5 mgOverall7.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodMirabegron 50 mgDry mouth3.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodSolifenacin 5 mgDry mouth5.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodMirabegron 50 mgDry throat0.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodSolifenacin 5 mgDry throat0.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodMirabegron 50 mgBlurred vision0.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment PeriodSolifenacin 5 mgBlurred vision0.4percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMirabegron 50 mg943
Overall StudySTARTEDSolifenacin 5 mg944
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Double-Blind DoseMirabegron 50 mg936
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Double-Blind DoseSolifenacin 5 mg934
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMirabegron 50 mg883
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSolifenacin 5 mg873
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMirabegron 50 mg60
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSolifenacin 5 mg71

Adverse events66

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersMirabegron 50 mg29936
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersSolifenacin 5 mg54934
seriousPneumoniaInfections and infestationsMirabegron 50 mg1936
seriousPneumoniaInfections and infestationsSolifenacin 5 mg2934
seriousAppendicitisInfections and infestationsMirabegron 50 mg0936
seriousAppendicitisInfections and infestationsSolifenacin 5 mg1934
seriousPyelonephritisInfections and infestationsMirabegron 50 mg1936
seriousPyelonephritisInfections and infestationsSolifenacin 5 mg0934
seriousPyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestationsMirabegron 50 mg1936
seriousPyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestationsSolifenacin 5 mg0934

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMirabegron 50 mg
Total, all-cause mortalitySolifenacin 5 mg
Total, other adverse eventsMirabegron 50 mg29936
Total, other adverse eventsSolifenacin 5 mg54934
Total, serious adverse eventsMirabegron 50 mg14936
Total, serious adverse eventsSolifenacin 5 mg13934

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01638000

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01638000/registered?page=2