ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01642914

Safety and Efficacy of Linaclotide in Patients With Chronic Constipation and Prominent Abdominal Bloating

NCT01642914, Phase 3, Completed, Forest Laboratories; results first posted 2016-04-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of Linaclotide in Patients With Chronic Constipation and Prominent Abdominal Bloating. Trials, record NCT01642914. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01642914

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Linaclotide in Patients With Chronic Constipation and Prominent Abdominal Bloating
NCT number
NCT01642914
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
487 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Forest Laboratories
Conditions
Chronic Constipation, Constipation
Interventions
Linaclotide 290 micrograms, Linaclotide 145 micrograms, Matching placebo
First posted
2012-07-17
Last updated
2016-04-26
Results first posted
2016-04-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder12-week treatment period
A 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.
Secondary9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder12-week treatment period
A 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal BloatingBaseline and 12-week treatment period
Abdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal BloatingBaseline and 12-week treatment period
Abdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments score of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Abdominal bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline at Week 12 in Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during Week 12.
Secondary6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% Responder12-week treatment period
A patient was a 6/12 week abdominal bloating 30% responder if, for at least 6 weeks of the 12-week treatment period, that patient's improvement from baseline in the weekly abdominal bloating score was ≥ 30% from baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency RateBaseline and 12-week treatment period
A patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over the 12 weeks of the treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.Baseline and Week 1
A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 1 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.Baseline and Week 4
A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 4 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 8 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Outcomes24

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
SECONDARY9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder12-week treatment period
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal BloatingBaseline and 12-week treatment period
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal BloatingBaseline and 12-week treatment period
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
percentage change of NRS scoreMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Reported outcome data is based on the 483 patient Intent-to-Treat Population. The distribution of each of the linaclotide groups was compared, in a pair-wise manner, to the placebo group using the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
percentage change in abdominal bloatingMEAN
SECONDARY6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% Responder12-week treatment period
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency RateBaseline and 12-week treatment period
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
CSBMs per weekMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.Baseline and Week 1
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
CSBMs per weekMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.Baseline and Week 4
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
CSBMs per weekMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 8Baseline and Week 8
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
CSBMs per weekMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population
CSBMs per weekMEAN

Results by group83

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderPlaceboResponder13participants
9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderLinaclotide 290 MicrogramsResponder26participants
9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderPlaceboNonresponder158participants
9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderLinaclotide 290 MicrogramsNonresponder133participants
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal BloatingPlacebo-1.583Standard Deviation 1.988units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal BloatingLinaclotide 145 Micrograms-2.476Standard Deviation 2.315units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal BloatingLinaclotide 290 Micrograms-2.456Standard Deviation 2.240units on a scale
Percent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal BloatingPlacebo-22.65Standard Deviation 29.19percentage change of NRS score
Percent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal BloatingLinaclotide 145 Micrograms-34.52Standard Deviation 31.79percentage change of NRS score
Percent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal BloatingLinaclotide 290 Micrograms-34.22Standard Deviation 30.65percentage change of NRS score

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo173
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide 145 Micrograms154
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide 290 Micrograms160
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo127
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLinaclotide 145 Micrograms122
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLinaclotide 290 Micrograms120
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo46
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLinaclotide 145 Micrograms32
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLinaclotide 290 Micrograms40

Adverse events36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo4173
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide 145 Micrograms9153
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide 290 Micrograms27160
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo5173
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsLinaclotide 145 Micrograms9153
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsLinaclotide 290 Micrograms5160
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo3173
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsLinaclotide 145 Micrograms9153
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsLinaclotide 290 Micrograms2160
seriousbrain stem infarctionNervous system disordersPlacebo1173

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide 145 Micrograms
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide 290 Micrograms
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo12173
Total, other adverse eventsLinaclotide 145 Micrograms25153
Total, other adverse eventsLinaclotide 290 Micrograms33160
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo2173
Total, serious adverse eventsLinaclotide 145 Micrograms4153
Total, serious adverse eventsLinaclotide 290 Micrograms2160

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26222318DERIVEDPubMed
33428631DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01642914

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01642914/registered?page=2