ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01643850

Registered outcomes24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor SizeWeek 4
To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in changing the size of PVNS tumors (as compared to baseline) compared to placebo over 4 weeks evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".
PrimaryPercent Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor SizeWeek 4
To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in percent change of the PVNS tumor volume at week 4 as compared to baseline and compared to placebo evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients who received at least a single dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".
PrimaryChange in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor SizeUp to 8 weeks post last dose
Assessment of maximum efficacy (multiple i.v.monthly doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 \& 10 mg/kg or 5 \& 10 mg/kg in changing PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Analysis included data starting from 1st dose of MCS110 in all treatment groups of Parts B and C. Part B patients who received placebo as 1st dose, measurement prior to receiving first dose of MCS110, was used as baseline and assessment time-points were adjusted accordingly. For Part C, participants starting treatment with low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. Analysis includes data from patients who received at least 2 doses. The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\]
PrimaryPercentage Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor SizeUp to 8 weeks post last dose
To assess the maximum efficacy of multiple monthly i.v. doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 and 10 mg/kg or 5 and 10 mg/kg by percent change in the PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Subjects starting treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from all participants who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsApproximately 2 yearsOverall incidence of Adverse Events
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MCS110 Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC)Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)Pharmacokinetic for a single dose of MCS110 for serum concentration -time curve (AUC).
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MCS110 Maximum Concentration (Cmax)Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for maximum serum concentration (Cmax)
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MCS110 Total Maximum Concentration (Tmax)Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for time to maximum concentration (Tmax)
SecondaryChange in Macrophage-colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) Plasma Concentrations Over TimeBaseline, Day 1, Day 85, Day 169Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for evaluation of macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) plasma concentrations over time
SecondaryChange in Serum C-terminal Type 1 Collagen Peptide Concentrations (CTX-I).Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, Week 104
Pharmacodynamic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 by measuring C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen peptide (CTX-I), a biomarker of bone resorption. Data measured in participants from three arms: participants from Part A, B and C who received a single dose of 10 mg/kg and had assessment at week 4 (Part ABC4); participants from Part A and B who received placebo ; and participants from Part B and C who received multiple monthly doses of MCS110 (10 mg/kg.) Serum CTX-I data were generated in Part A and Part B. In Part C, samples were collected for serum bone CTX-I analysis. The analysis was not performed, as enough information on compound mode of action was obtained using creatine kinase (CK) and monocytes (hematology) data. Only data from 10mg/kg (single and multiple doses) are available.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Negative Anti-MCS110 AntibodyBaseline, throughout the study up to Day 505To assess the immunogenicity of MCS110 in serum anti-MCS110 antibody concentrations
SecondaryAssessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and FlexionWeek 4
To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following a single i.v. dose of MCS110 or placebo as compared to baseline 4 weeks post-dose evaluated in participants, who had a knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".
SecondaryAssessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and FlexionWeek 24/28, Week 104
To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following multiple dose treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated in participants with knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants, who started treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Joint Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40, Week 48, Week 104
Measurement of the participant's pain with a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) following treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated. Data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants were asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented her/his pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score was determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the participants mark, providing a score from 0-100. Analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].
SecondaryTime to RelapseUp to Week 104
Time to relapse describes the time frame from baseline when the tumor volume increases again after the treatment with MCS110. To be considered a relapse tumor volume had to increase greater than 50% of the difference between tumor volume at baseline and the lowest tumor volume measured by MRI. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. N/A (not available):Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery/relapse.
SecondaryTime to SurgeryUp to Week 104
Time to surgery describes the time frame from baseline to the time point when participants had surgical removement of PVNS tumor. This could be either residual tumor after the tumor volume was reduced or surgery due to relapse. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. Not Available (NA): Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery.
SecondaryAverage of Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Score for mHAQup to 104 weeks
The mHAQ assesses 20 activities in 8 categories related to daily life, which are rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The mHAQ is calculated as the average of the single scores with the following scoring: without difficulty =0; with some difficulty =1; with much difficulty =2; unable to do =3. Total score is between 0 - 3.0. Values \<0.3 are considered normal. Data presented include only participants, who received multiple doses of MCS110.
SecondaryNumber of CD14+ Monocytes and Number of CD14 + Monocytes and CD16+ MonocytesBaseline Up to Week 104
Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of CD14+ monocytes (using FACS) and CD14+ CD16+ monocytes. Based on preliminary analysis, the quality of the samples did not allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn. Thus, in Part B, the monocyte sample collection was discontinued.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)
The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life (QOL), pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment for Knee Related Quality of Life in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)
The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01643850/registered