ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01646125

An Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AUY922 vs Pemetrexed or Docetaxel in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutations

NCT01646125, Phase 2, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2017-03-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AUY922 vs Pemetrexed or Docetaxel in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutations. Trials, record NCT01646125. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01646125

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AUY922 vs Pemetrexed or Docetaxel in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutations
NCT number
NCT01646125
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
59 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Interventions
AUY922, Docetaxel, Pemetrexed
First posted
2012-07-20
Last updated
2019-07-24
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-001050-25
Results first posted
2017-03-13
Limitations and caveats
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results to terminate the study early due to futility, data was not collected for this assessment on many of the secondary endpoints.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)16 months
Compared PFS between the treatment of AUY922 to comparators Pemetrexed or Docetaxel. Progression-free survival (PFS) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 was the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)16 months
ORR was to be compared between treatment arms. The ORR was to be based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Per this criteria for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.This outcome measure was originally planned to be analyzed up to 24 months. The DMC recommendation at the IA was to stop the study for futility. As a result, collection of all the efficacy assessments was stopped at that time.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)from randomization until death up to death
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a death has not been observed by the date of analysis cutoff, then OS was to be censored at the last known date patient was alive.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsDuration of DCR will be compared between treatment arms. The duration of DCR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
SecondaryTime to Response (TRR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsTTR was to compare between treatment arms. The TTR was to be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsThe DOR will be compared between treatment arms. The DOR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
SecondaryRate of Adverse Events (AEs)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsTo evaluate safety and tolerability of AUY922 compared to chemotherapy agents pemetrexed or docetaxel.
SecondaryChange in Laboratory Paramentersbaseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsChanges in hematology and chemistry values, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), Dose interruptions, reductions and dose intensity.
SecondaryTime to Progression (TTP)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 monthsTTP will be compared between treatment arms. The TTP will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)16 months
Efficacy analysis set (EAS) compromised of a subset of patients in the FAS who received 2 lines of prior antineoplastic therapy consisting of a platinum-based treatment \& an EGFR TKI treatment. The DMC recommendation at Interim analysis was to stop the study for futility. As a result, collection of all efficacy assessments was stopped.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate (ORR)16 months
The data monitoring committee's (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)from randomization until death up to death
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.
SECONDARYTime to Response (TRR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.
SECONDARYRate of Adverse Events (AEs)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.
SECONDARYChange in Laboratory Paramentersbaseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.
SECONDARYTime to Progression (TTP)baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
The data monitoring committee (DMC's) recommendation based on the Interim Analysis (IA) results was to terminate the study early due to futility; collection of efficacy data for assessment was stopped at that time.

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression Free Survival (PFS)AUY922 Arm1.590% Confidence Interval 1.2 to 5.6Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Chemotherapy Arm2.390% Confidence Interval 1.2 to 4.0Months
Overall Response Rate (ORR)AUY922 ArmComplete Response (CR)0Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Chemotherapy ArmComplete Response (CR)0Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)AUY922 ArmPartial Response (PR)3Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Chemotherapy ArmPartial Response (PR)2Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)AUY922 ArmORR (CR + PR)3Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Chemotherapy ArmORR (CR + PR)2Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAUY922 Arm31
Overall StudySTARTEDChemotherapy Arm28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAUY922 Arm0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDChemotherapy Arm0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAUY922 Arm31
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDChemotherapy Arm28

Adverse events225

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersAUY922 Arm529
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy Arm023
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersTotal552
otherLYMPHOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersAUY922 Arm229
otherLYMPHOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy Arm123
otherLYMPHOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersTotal352
otherNEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersAUY922 Arm029
otherNEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy Arm323
otherNEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersTotal352
otherACCOMMODATION DISORDEREye disordersAUY922 Arm229

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAUY922 Arm
Total, all-cause mortalityChemotherapy Arm
Total, all-cause mortalityTotal
Total, other adverse eventsAUY922 Arm2829
Total, other adverse eventsChemotherapy Arm2123
Total, other adverse eventsTotal4952
Total, serious adverse eventsAUY922 Arm1029
Total, serious adverse eventsChemotherapy Arm623
Total, serious adverse eventsTotal1652

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01646125

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01646125/events?page=2