ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01649869

Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants and Children With Congenital CMV Infection and Hearing Loss

NCT01649869, Phase 2, Completed, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); results first posted 2021-06-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants and Children With Congenital CMV Infection and Hearing Loss. Trials, record NCT01649869. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01649869

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants and Children With Congenital CMV Infection and Hearing Loss
NCT number
NCT01649869
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
54 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Conditions
Cytomegalovirus Infection
Interventions
Placebo, Valganciclovir
First posted
2012-07-25
Last updated
2024-10-16
Results first posted
2021-06-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Ears That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing.Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss. Not both ears are evaluable for all subjects. In some subjects, only one ear is evaluable.
SecondaryNumber of Best Ear That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing [ex. Improved+ no Change (Normal to Normal) Versus Other].Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss. For this outcome, we combine the improved hearing and no change for the special case only of normal to normal. Other category include worsened and no change from (1) mild to mild hearing loss, (2) moderate to moderate hearing loss, or (3) severe to severe hearing loss.
SecondaryChange in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
SecondaryChange in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse + no Change (Abnormal to Abnormal) Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
SecondaryChange in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
SecondaryChange in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
SecondaryChange in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse+ no Change (Abnormal to Abnormal) Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
SecondaryChange in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
SecondaryAssociation of Change in Viral Load (Blood) With Change in Total Ear Hearing at 6 MonthsAt 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units of log 10 copies/ml\*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.
SecondaryAssociation of Change in Viral Load (Saliva) With Change in Total Ear Hearing at 6 MonthsAt 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units or log 10 copies/ml\*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Ears That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing.Day 1 through Day 180EarsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Best Ear That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing [ex. Improved+ no Change (Normal to Normal) Versus Other].Day 1 through Day 180ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse + no Change (Abnormal to Abnormal) Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180EarsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse+ no Change (Abnormal to Abnormal) Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180EarsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.Day 1 through Day 180EarsNUMBER
SECONDARYAssociation of Change in Viral Load (Blood) With Change in Total Ear Hearing at 6 MonthsAt 6 monthsAnalysis was stratified by hearing outcome--total analyzed is the sum of the number analyzed for 2 rows belowlog 10 copies/mlMEAN
SECONDARYAssociation of Change in Viral Load (Saliva) With Change in Total Ear Hearing at 6 MonthsAt 6 monthsAnalysis stratified by hearing outcome--total analyzed is the sum of the number analyzed for 2 rows beloslog 10 copies/mlMEAN

Results by group84

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Ears That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing.PlaceboImprove + no change27Ears
Number of Ears That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing.ActiveImprove + no change20Ears
Number of Ears That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing.PlaceboWorsened1Ears
Number of Ears That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing.ActiveWorsened6Ears
Number of Best Ear That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing [ex. Improved+ no Change (Normal to Normal) Versus Other].PlaceboImproved + normal to normal9Participants
Number of Best Ear That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing [ex. Improved+ no Change (Normal to Normal) Versus Other].ActiveImproved + normal to normal6Participants
Number of Best Ear That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing [ex. Improved+ no Change (Normal to Normal) Versus Other].PlaceboNo change abnormal or worsened6Participants
Number of Best Ear That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing [ex. Improved+ no Change (Normal to Normal) Versus Other].ActiveNo change abnormal or worsened6Participants
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.PlaceboImproved0Participants
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.ActiveImproved0Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo18
Overall StudySTARTEDActive17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo16
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActive16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDActive1

Adverse events122

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDecrease in hemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1181
otherDecrease in hemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disordersActive0170
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo2184
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersActive1171
otherMonocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0180
otherMonocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersActive1171
otherBilateral ear infectionEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo1181
otherBilateral ear infectionEar and labyrinth disordersActive0170
otherOtitis MediaEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo1181
otherOtitis MediaEar and labyrinth disordersActive1171

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo018
Total, all-cause mortalityActive017
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1835
Total, other adverse eventsActive1735
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo018
Total, serious adverse eventsActive117

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38309519DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Active vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Active vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01649869

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01649869/registered?page=2